Frankly Gemini I am working with the idea that our current state, or capacity of consciousness is directly related to the harvest of the previous octave, in which the principles of mover/moved coalesced in to a new form of unified mechanic. It seems to me that the last octave was based on the development of FOCUS, or rather, Intention. The One Thought must have come from the First Intention of Thought.
Simply, there are two primary facets of consciousness, as stated, actual and potential. Now the Matrix or "net", which is that which receives the potential, we can consider to be unmoved. Lets think of this Matrix as your mind, or rather the Matrix of the Mind
. Your mind does not move, however, there is activity there. Now we know that there is nothing actually IN the conscious mind. It is only a receiver and activator of unconscious potentials within the self. This is the fun part, because we are aware that everything consists of self and other self. When the world about you moves, it is in fact only a reflection of your internal movement. The Creator walks within itself, with itself and without itself.
Now, since consciousness exists at absolutely every particulate point within space/time we can conclude that in fact all movement is a relativity of energy, or an energy transfer between points of consciousness (Remembering consciousness is unmoved and is only that which activates, or receives, the potential. Say we have wind "blowing" from one side of a space to another. Lets imagine a room where there is some kind of wind creation system at one end. We start off with the room still, the energy is even. Now we activate the system, it could be a fan or even a vent, and suddenly the particulate consciousness which is closest to this system is activated. The particulate consciousness becomes aware of a new energy state from the interaction with the other portions of consciousness. Take a vent as an example, there is pressure (the local atmosphere/temperature) in the room that is different from the air outside, and when the vent is opened the air inside the room becomes aware of the air outside the room, they become a unified system and begin to permeate eachother. Automatic balance takes place, and the effects of this automatic balance are felt as "wind" or movement of the air. The movement is the EFFECT of the calibration. But what is actually going on here?
In classical physics the idea is that particles are these little bits of "stuff" that fly around and in to eachother. This would suggest then that when a wind comes by you, you are experiencing DIFFERENT atoms than you were moments before. This is the quantitative perception which as Icaro said are the products of individualize portions of intelligent infinite. However, it does not state that these individualized portions are free-roaming, and in fact if you read carefully it states that these things are only the PRODUCT of individualized portions. It must be always, and utmostly, remembered that we are in a world of EFFECTS. We are only seeing the very final product after all is said and done. This is a key point in understanding the nature of the illusion.
Now, if we look deeper, at something called the Uncertainty Principle we get closer to what I mean by consciousness being "unmoved". The Uncertainty Principle states that the more we know about a sub-particle's position, the less we know about its momentum, and the same vice versa. This, to me, seems to be rather obvious. When something is moving, it no longer has a position, it has a path. Now, we find the position through observation, or more directly, through focus, or intention. We know that at every position there exists a sub-particle, and we know that every single one of them has momentum. However, this means that in fact sub-particles
are only particles upon observation and that when we are not observing them they exist only as potential motion. This is crucial because it firmly establishes the fact that matter is not at all comprised of different "bits", but rather it is a coagulation of position and momentum that is the product of intelligent infinity experiencing itself.
So now, when we come to thinking of ourselves walking, we may take note of the fact that we are first off, only seeing the final results of the whole process of the experiential moment. Which means that when you move your legs, change your position, and feel motion, these are only the PRODUCTS of the consciousness activating that which is potential. Now, we have to stop thinking of our consciousness as being only inside of our head. Because it is not "our" consciousness, it is simply consciousness. Read, each of us possesses the exact same consciousness, because were you to take away our external forms we would see that in fact we all stem from the same point, the same archetypal mind. Of course, since consciousness is everywhere and is the cause of all manifestation we can conclude that it does not, in fact, move. Since for it to move would be analogous to the entire universe changing position, but since position is a finite portion of the universe it's clear why this would make no sense. So if consciousness doesn't move, what does? The PRODUCTS of consciousness move, in fact the product of consciousness being activated is movement. There is no movement until the COMBINATION of consciousness and unconsciousness, because it is not until potential is activated that there is any sort of activity. This also means that the unconscious (still obviously being a form of consciousness, merely that which is in potential) also does not move, which makes sense given its infinite nature. This does not mean that consciousness BECOMES movement, but rather that the activation of consciousness is the mechanic which gives rise to movement.
Let me use one of my favorite analogies, being a musician, that of the drum. Now with a drum there are two basic components, the shell and the skin. Lets call the shell the Matrix, and the skin the Potentiator. Without interaction they produce nothing, they do nothing. However, if you hit the skin, this is akin to an impulse from the unconscious it is "picked up" by the shell. Now, the shell is an amplifier, it does nothing but take the potential of the skin and activates it. However, what comes out is neither the skin, nor the shell, we have SOUND. Which is, movement! And so we have two things which do not move giving rise to movement as if out of nothing. This is pure manifestation! Of course, as many of us I'm sure are aware, there is nothing that is not sound. However, we know physical sound to simply be oscillation, it is a vibrational frequency. There is yet another kind of sound though which is produce from the being. This is the sound of atoms, of molecules, of cells, of light, it is "internal sound". (I have borrowed this concept from the The Nature of Personal Reality: A Seth Book) THIS sound, is one's internal movement and it is this internal orchestration which is reflected as external movement.
So, we can look at consciousness and the unconscious as being two parts of a drum, which together produce this "internal sound". It is this which is the movement we perceive outside of ourselves, the internal sounds of all the cosmos, the music of the spheres as it is called. In truth, movement springs from consciousness, but it is a substance and not an essence. Consciousness does not move.
Now we come to the point of perception, and why all movement is actually just the result of space/time distortion AROUND consciousness. In every moment the world is redrawn based on the changing internal configuration of sound. So you may think that as you walk you are going from Point A to Point B, and that you are traversing a space, but in truth Point A to B has an infinite number of fractal points in between. So when you think you are "moving", you are in fact simply reforming your external illusion according to your internal configuration. If your intention is to alter your environment (which is what such movement is) and by your root assumptions "environment" is made of space/time then by necessity your form will reflect that intention. Things will happen in accordance to the effectual realm, appropriate energy is allotted, form is changed in a manner which appropriates the conditions for the change in perception (such as your body form changing from a form designed for standing to a form which translates the nature of the intention in to a physical concept, you associate walking with the moving of the legs). Since we know absolutely everything is other-self, we know that the particles that make up your being do not stop at your skin. In truth your "body" goes as far as your perception, because that which you perceive outside of you is only a reflection of that configuration which is within you. Which means that what we typically call a "change of perspective" is in fact an alteration made to the internal configuration which intends the new perspective, and the form follows the will.
I think that suffices to explain what I mean by the fact that space moves around our consciousness, because indeed consciousness is beyond space/time. We are Creators and we are responsible for that which we see, based on our intention.
Phew, now, next topic, that of the difference between consciousness and awareness. Personally, I think you have those backwards Icaro, because consciousness is not an act, it is the state of being, whereas awareness is the expansion in to that consciousness. It is awareness which shines forth more and more consciousness. As you increase your awareness, you increase your awareness of consciousness, but since consciousness is infinite there is no need to increase it. Consciousness produces experience, and awareness enhances it.
And, the last subject, that of the Sun. While I do find David Wilcock's idea accurate in a manner according to the Sun being a metaphysical principle of creation, I would note that Ra states that the Sun's physical body does manifest as a sort of nuclear fusion. Although, in terms of Source what Wilcock says could be true. Perhaps the suns origin is this "hole" in space and the fusion simply the external shell. Maybe stars are in fact the white holes which black holes output from, which would make some degree of sense if we consider Light to be that which creates and stars to be the progenitor of light. To be sure, I cannot say. Everything in this post is absolutely theory and speculation, but of course, isn't everything?
I hope this explanation has been useful, Love and Light in the One, blessings all, adonai.
