Bring4th

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/us/24q...ml?_r=1&hp

Hope everyone is fine

Apparently there were tremors here. I didn't feel them because I was on a lawn mower. I missed out .

First time I ever felt a quake. I'm here in Pa.

I'm in NE Tennessee and all of us at work felt it. It felt like the floor was going up and down and my computer monitor was shaking up and down, too.

Weird... there was also an unusual one in Colorado. I looked up the latest earthquakes in IRIS SEISMON and found in the last three days there were also quakes in Greece, Afghanistan, and Japan.

These five locations are all within 2 degrees of latitude from one another.

I wonder if something is starting?

http://www.iris.edu/seismon/

I actually have thought for a while now the U.S. has been too quiet on the earthquake front seeing as every other part of the world has been getting hammered this year. But that part of the states is unusual for it isnt it?

---

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/wor...6120955201

Ps. I wish the media would die in a fire. More fear mongering bs

/facepalm

You know how there are messages urging people to go to "safe places" in the world? It's struck me that if in fact they want an easier controlled population it would be done by separating them in to small "off-grid" communities through fear. Don't give in to the fear mongering, now more than ever we all need to stand our group and unite!

(08-23-2011, 11:28 PM)Azrael Wrote: [ -> ]Don't give in to the fear mongering, now more than ever we all need to stand our group and unite!

Or simply serve as passive radiators...

The epicenter was in Virginia, but I felt it in the afternoon too (I'm in New York) and on another forum I frequent people in New Mexico could feel it; hell, even someone in TORONTO, CANADA could feel it!

Some are speculating this is HAARP at work.

(08-23-2011, 11:28 PM)Azrael Wrote: [ -> ]You know how there are messages urging people to go to "safe places" in the world? It's struck me that if in fact they want an easier controlled population it would be done by separating them in to small "off-grid" communities through fear. Don't give in to the fear mongering, now more than ever we all need to stand our group and unite!

http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/open-f...phecy.html Came across this last night. It happens to match up with my personal findings and the visions of a good friend. My decisions to move were based on inner guidance and nothing to do with MSM. Many folks from all walks of life are migrating away from society with an instinctual feeling that it is an old and dying animal (beast).

I haven't looked yet but the way to find out if its HAARP related is go to the website and see if there has been a constant frequency of the 2.5 mark (that's the earthquake frequency), and also looking at the weather satellite for "perfect circle" cloud formations. There has been speculation that the "powers that be" have been targeting the midwest through first the tornadoes then the flooding along the new madrid fault, and I did see those perfect circle cloud formations during the worst tornado storms, mostly generating out of fort worth texas, along with constant HAARP bombardment in the 1.75 range (no one has confirmed so but I suspect that is the tornado frequency). It would make sense for it to be all part of the bad plans, but I haven't looked yet so I dunno.

As for getting out of the cities I personally think if you want to and the opportunity arises then sure, but at the same time if the s*** hits the fan, do we even really know if we would want to be among the survivors if the world wasn't a good place to be after that? I wouldn't want to go running in fear, certainly not until I had a grasp of the situation first.

---

Ok imo not HAARP related
http://maestro.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/...0824&Bx=on

---

http://maestro.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/...i?20110310

This is what an induced earthquake looks like (right before the Japanese one)

Yeah I actually live in columbia, Maryland and man I havent felt an earthquake before it was quite interesting...lasted for like20 plus seconds...my door was shaking, then my bed, then my wall....

Love,
Steve

I am not sure if this is HAARP related. Too much disinfo out there to make a good opinion. In general there is a lot of disinformation out there related to 2012. But, you would have to be pretty ignorant to think things, in a geo-mechanical sense are "normal" these days. I've done the research at USGS and found that in the early 2000s we were avg'ing 1350 >=5.0M quakes. In the mid 2000s that number jumps to somewhere around 1700-1800 per year. Since then, we're up around 2000-2100 per year. This year is on pace to crack 2500 quakes of that magnitude or greater. So there is definitely something causing this uptick. What is it? Could it be polar ice melting and migrating to the equator and therefore increasing the load on the equatorial plates of the pacific and atlantic? I don't really know.
Then there are the celestial bodies that are, I believe, entering our solar system right now. MAny of you might have heard about a "tenth planet" (it has many names it's known by), comet elenin and all associated moons/planets. They orbit in a long period elliptical and have been doing so like clockwork for billions of years. This occurrence will be unprecedented and very sad. Why? Because there are SO many people on earth and many of us are completely dependent upon electricity to survive and thrive.
Many of you are probably aware that the sun is entering a very energetic period (I believe this solar maximum will be very strong due to these extra celestial bodies) and it could spell doom for anything electrical should one of it's CMEs or solar flares hit us directly. It would be unavoidable.
I believe we will continue to see an uptick in all of these geo-mechanical happenings in stranger places. Such as the quake on the east coast. THings will only intensify over the next 2-5 years with the peak activity happening in the year from late 2012 to mid 2013. Governments of the world have been preparing for something of this nature for decades. Building deep underground bases and stocking them with food, water, horticulture technologies and other necessaries.
What can we do? I'm still not sure about that. For a while, with all of the disinfo being spread around, I was in a "wait and see" mode. Now, I'm thinking about preparing in earnest. I'm seriously considering investing in solar energy technologies (I don't mean stock market...I mean buying solar energy setups for use). I will also consider buying a portable water filtration system (reverse osmosis or a vapor distiller). Stocking up on salt (lots of it), spices and a wide variety of seeds. Hunting equipment, skinning supplies and educating myself on how to preserve meats and veggies. Then you have to think about medical emergency supplies. Including antibiotics for emergency. I think a radiation meter might be a good idea to make sure whatever you're consuming is safe to eat, in that regard. There is much else I need to consider, as well.
Bottom line, don't panic. Humans have survived many of these occurrences. And there is no reason why we won't this time. It's a very scary proposition, I know. Let your heart guide you and put your ego voice in it's place. If you let your ego guide you, you will panic and probably not be very successful in whatever you do. Let your heart be your guide.

(08-25-2011, 11:52 PM)ConsciousnessWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]I've done the research at USGS and found that in the early 2000s we were avg'ing 1350 >=5.0M quakes. In the mid 2000s that number jumps to somewhere around 1700-1800 per year. Since then, we're up around 2000-2100 per year. This year is on pace to crack 2500 quakes of that magnitude or greater.

Worldwide quakes of magnitude 5.0 or greater (source USGS & http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/other/quake1.html ):
1980: 1418
1981: 1271
1982: 1520
1983: 1813
1984: 1678
1985: 1798
1986: 1798
1987: 1760
1988: 1560
1989: 1586
1990: 1744
1991: 1569
1992: 1677
1993: 1575
1994: 1701
1995: 1521
1996: 1386
1997: 1249
1998: 1108
1999: 1238
2000: 1505
2001: 1361
2002: 1341
2003: 1358
2004: 1672
2005: 1844
2006: 1865
2007: 2270
2008: 1958
2009: 2124
2010: 2136
2011: 2069 (Sep 25)

(08-26-2011, 12:46 AM)zenmaster Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-25-2011, 11:52 PM)ConsciousnessWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]I've done the research at USGS and found that in the early 2000s we were avg'ing 1350 >=5.0M quakes. In the mid 2000s that number jumps to somewhere around 1700-1800 per year. Since then, we're up around 2000-2100 per year. This year is on pace to crack 2500 quakes of that magnitude or greater.

Worldwide quakes of magnitude 5.0 or greater (source USGS & http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/other/quake1.html ):
1980: 1418
1981: 1271
1982: 1520
1983: 1813
1984: 1678
1985: 1798
1986: 1798
1987: 1760
1988: 1560
1989: 1586
1990: 1744
1991: 1569
1992: 1677
1993: 1575
1994: 1701
1995: 1521
1996: 1386
1997: 1249
1998: 1108
1999: 1238
2000: 1505
2001: 1361
2002: 1341
2003: 1358
2004: 1672
2005: 1844
2006: 1865
2007: 2270
2008: 1958
2009: 2124
2010: 2136
2011: 1888 (Aug 25)

if you went locally you would find even more phenomenal increases. the region i am in for example, has rumped up its quake number approx 80-100 times compared to last years.

the US hasn't been quiet, it's been getting way too many quakes

what parts of the US are the safest? what parts of europe? is australia safe?

I believe anyone standing next to me.... is safe

---

(I ain't creeeight n no cat ass trophy in mm eye wirld)

i'm a come right over, buhh-dy

Swing by and pick up Confused. He needs a trip to here.

(sorry for making you work so hard Monica. It ain't easy being green )

(08-26-2011, 11:16 AM)unity100 Wrote: [ -> ]if you went locally you would find even more phenomenal increases. the region i am in for example, has rumped up its quake number approx 80-100 times compared to last years.

Actually, can't see any kind of upward trend in the local (US) numbers. Also there is no upward trend world-wide in the highest magnitude quakes.

(08-26-2011, 06:52 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: [ -> ]Swing by and pick up Confused. He needs a trip to here.

That's sweet, 3!! The problem is Oceania does not want to meet me IRL :p

She is scared of me!

Well, before the other folks consider my presence a nuisance to the purpose of this thread, I shall flee from here.

---

(08-26-2011, 06:20 PM)Oceania Wrote: [ -> ]i'm a come right over, buhh-dy

You just need a reason to be next to 3! :p Something

(08-26-2011, 11:16 AM)unity100 Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-26-2011, 12:46 AM)zenmaster Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-25-2011, 11:52 PM)ConsciousnessWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]I've done the research at USGS and found that in the early 2000s we were avg'ing 1350 >=5.0M quakes. In the mid 2000s that number jumps to somewhere around 1700-1800 per year. Since then, we're up around 2000-2100 per year. This year is on pace to crack 2500 quakes of that magnitude or greater.

Worldwide quakes of magnitude 5.0 or greater (source USGS & http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/other/quake1.html ):
1980: 1418
1981: 1271
1982: 1520
1983: 1813
1984: 1678
1985: 1798
1986: 1798
1987: 1760
1988: 1560
1989: 1586
1990: 1744
1991: 1569
1992: 1677
1993: 1575
1994: 1701
1995: 1521
1996: 1386
1997: 1249
1998: 1108
1999: 1238
2000: 1505
2001: 1361
2002: 1341
2003: 1358
2004: 1672
2005: 1844
2006: 1865
2007: 2270
2008: 1958
2009: 2124
2010: 2136
2011: 1888 (Aug 25)

if you went locally you would find even more phenomenal increases. the region i am in for example, has rumped up its quake number approx 80-100 times compared to last years.

Interesting...look at 1998.....1108? Wow! Could be solar minimum?

(08-27-2011, 12:16 AM)ConsciousnessWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting...look at 1998.....1108? Wow! Could be solar minimum?

Why wow? There is no strong correlation between observable solar activity and earthquakes, or with the moon, or time of day or year.
I'd say there is a significant increase in activity of 5.0 or greater in the past few years, considering the average since 1900 has been around 1500. If an upward trend develops or simply maintains, after a couple of years there may be some cause for investigation.

(08-27-2011, 12:47 AM)zenmaster Wrote: [ -> ]There is no strong correlation between observable solar activity and earthquakes, or with the moon, or time of day or year.

Or astrology.

(08-27-2011, 12:47 AM)zenmaster Wrote: [ -> ]There is no strong correlation between observable solar activity and earthquakes, or with the moon, or time of day or year

http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2036

Quote:Astronomical alignments as the cause of ~M6+ seismicity
Mensur Omerbashich
(Submitted on 11 Apr 2011 (v1), last revised 24 Aug 2011 (this version, v4))

I here demonstrate empirically my georesonator concept in which tidally induced magnification of Earth masses' resonance causes seismicity. To that end, I show that all strong (~M6+) earthquakes of 2010 occurred during the Earth's long (t > 3 day) astronomical alignments within our solar system. I then show that the same holds true for all very strong (~M8+) earthquakes of the decade of 2000's. Finally, the strongest (M8.6+) earthquakes of the past century are shown to have occurred during the Earth's multiple long alignments, whereas half of the high-strongest (M9+) ones occurred during Full Moon. I used the comet C/2010 X1 (Elenin), as it has been adding to robustness in terms of very strong seismicity since 2007 (in terms of strongest seismicity: since 1965). The Elenin will continue intensifying the Earth's very strong seismicity until August-October, 2011. Approximate forecast of earthquakes based on my discoveries is feasible. This demonstration proves my hyperresonator concept, arrived at earlier as a mathematical-physical solution to the most general extension of the georesonator concept possible.

What is your opinion?

(08-27-2011, 12:47 AM)zenmaster Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-27-2011, 12:16 AM)ConsciousnessWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting...look at 1998.....1108? Wow! Could be solar minimum?

Why wow? There is no strong correlation between observable solar activity and earthquakes, or with the moon, or time of day or year.
I'd say there is a significant increase in activity of 5.0 or greater in the past few years, considering the average since 1900 has been around 1500. If an upward trend develops or simply maintains, after a couple of years there may be some cause for investigation.

Sorry, but, waiting years for a pattern to maintain simply isn't very smart given the implications of 2012. LOL

(08-27-2011, 09:43 PM)ConsciousnessWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-27-2011, 12:47 AM)zenmaster Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-27-2011, 12:16 AM)ConsciousnessWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting...look at 1998.....1108? Wow! Could be solar minimum?

Why wow? There is no strong correlation between observable solar activity and earthquakes, or with the moon, or time of day or year.
I'd say there is a significant increase in activity of 5.0 or greater in the past few years, considering the average since 1900 has been around 1500. If an upward trend develops or simply maintains, after a couple of years there may be some cause for investigation.

Sorry, but, waiting years for a pattern to maintain simply isn't very smart given the implications of 2012. LOL

Probably less smart to create assumptions about '2012'. LOL

(08-28-2011, 01:39 PM)zenmaster Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-27-2011, 09:43 PM)ConsciousnessWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-27-2011, 12:47 AM)zenmaster Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-27-2011, 12:16 AM)ConsciousnessWarrior Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting...look at 1998.....1108? Wow! Could be solar minimum?

Why wow? There is no strong correlation between observable solar activity and earthquakes, or with the moon, or time of day or year.
I'd say there is a significant increase in activity of 5.0 or greater in the past few years, considering the average since 1900 has been around 1500. If an upward trend develops or simply maintains, after a couple of years there may be some cause for investigation.

Sorry, but, waiting years for a pattern to maintain simply isn't very smart given the implications of 2012. LOL

Probably less smart to create assumptions about '2012'. LOL

the 'why now' is, the south american landing group. there is information in regard to the past of this planet that we have which mainstream science does not accept.

there was a landing in south america as we know, and these entities did a lot of teaching. what they have taught, has not been mentioned by Ra. when we look at the knowledge and heritage of south american civilization, however, we see that there is inordinate amounts of astronomical knowledge and effort. mainstream science ties this to the 'need to track seasons for farming', but this is just rationalization - chinese civilization was a longer standing civilization which also subsisted in farming, but the measure of astronomical interest in china, despite being much a bigger zone than the others, have not at all been comparable with egypt or the cultures influenced by it, or south america.

two of these zones we know to be contact zones, and especially landings.

so now we have a mayan calendar which has cycles increasingly shrinking in frequency and culminating in a cycle overlap date. and then we have Ra material, which puts the date for harvest at the same vicinity. both the Ra group and south american group were working towards harvest. and not surprisingly, tzolkin count calendar is a calendar that follows cycles of the sun.

statistically, too coincidental to be coincidence.