Bring4th

I just wanted to share with anyone interested my personal understanding of the Light that is often spoken of in terms of a path or goal.

This Light is not to be compared with the light of polarity. It is not be seen as the polarity of dark, as in black and white or love and hate.

This Light is how many of the Ancients acknowledge the Mystery behind the universe. They refer to it as Light because when we come to realize its presence we become both a light to our own understanding, and a light to those to whom we are able to express this understanding. This is why understanding the things of creation has come to be known as 'being enlightened'.

So when we refer to the path of Light as opposed to the path of darkness, we are referring to a direction that leads one to an understanding of the universe. And in that understanding also comes the realization that we are not individuals in our complete sense of being, but only in our incomplete fragmented sense of being. And it is in this fragmented sense that we experince this creation right now. And as individual experiences we have the choice of direction. A direction which either involves growing in knowledge, wisdom and love which we ancients would call walking toward the Light, or the direction that involves only seeking after self gratification where no wisdom is gained, which we would call walking in darkness.

To attempt to understand this as polarity will not bring you to an understanding of it. Light and dark polarities are not choices of direction.

It is my understanding that with the realization of the One Consciousness also comes the realization that we are One, which means that we are not individual. And with that realization, we must therefore understand this illusion that we have thought of as our self. With awareness of the One Consciousness also comes an awareness that we are not this individual self attached to this temporary form. And with that awareness everything else that was attached to the experiencing of that self also becomes irrelevant. we begin to understand that in order to evolve we must grow beyond this self that we thought we were and all of things that it was attached to.

Now this does not mean abandoning life or not appreciating the beautiful aspects of life. What this means is that we realize a much larger life with a much larger basket of opportunity, and that we have a direction to choose. What this means is that now that we realize we are One consciousness, we also understand how that One experiences its creation via the many fragments of the One, each choosing to either grow and develop according to the divine design, or to be retarded in that evolution and evolve at a slower pace.

This choice as to which direction to walk, is acknowledged by the ancients as walking in the Light, or walking in darkness. And in this existence at our level of consciousness/evolution, reincarnating more times than one might have to, is also considered to be walking in darkness.

Quote:Waves and/or particles? The duality was created to explain away barriers that stopped the conversation, like to explain how one particle can travel through two holes. This problem of course is even more complicated when two holes are deemed necessary to produced "interference".

Absent in all of these discussions is the nonlocal - the nastiest word in the physics bible. A heretic, John S Bell, made the point that none/few are willing to read, much less begin to understand, made a very important point: A quantum mechanical model that is void in nonlocal force centers explicitly, intrinsicaly included in the model, is incomplete.

Wave-particle-duality is the smoke screen being read as one reads chariots racing in the billowing clouds, while others observe fornicating dolphins. What you see is what you think you get get.

You see these words, the room the keyboard and walls. These are the real of the observed. The real, "real", being but a word, has no meaning in a purely observable world. Then one must ask, who, or what is observing, the entity placing meaning to the observed? This then is the nonlocal peeking through the filter (antenna?) of those orbs you referred to above.

The photon, which some refer to as dual in nature, is not so complicated. Some describe photons as being of two basic types: horizontally polarized and vertically polarized. This would be an inefficient universe beyond comprehension. However, when considering the photon as not both horizontal and vertical in type but as oscillating between the two the puzzle is unraveled.

One instant the moving vibrant photon is horizontal, the next vertical the next horizontal. In time the photon's horizontal/vertical history is simple and generates as,

...HVHVHVHVHVHVHVHVHVH... ---> time

When the photon is measured, when it strikes your eye and energizes all those networks in the neuorsystem, the osscillation ceases. Whatever state the ...HVHVHV.. is in when measured this is the state of polarization, by measured default, for no better description.

We see this phenom in the 'up' and 'down' states of electrons filtered through Stern-Gerlach inhomogenous magnetic fields, and is especially revealing in spin-1 particles where there are three possible states, two of which are always nonlocal as the three states cycle through the three possibilities until measured, or until entering the magnetic field where the current observed state becomes polarized - measured -defined locally.

The 'wave particle duality' deemed necessary for two-hole diffraction explanations, becomes a single entity again when one recognizes that one hole is necessary for the photon structure, the other hole for transmission of the current H or V mode, to insure interference patterns on the detecting screen after transmission. In other words, when only one hole is available the local/nonlocal osscilaltion follow the photon structure down the same hole, with two holes the photon structure is in one channel, the current H/V mode is in the other-meeting the holes is the measurement, the observation, or an observation.

With the observed cycle H, the V is nonlocal, when V observable,is manifest, H is nonlocal.

Nonlocal, as opposed to being merely "off" and so on, is just that part of the universe with no spatial significance, dreams, the viewer through the orbs reading these words, the ghost in the machine cooperating with the organic entity, the machine, where the duality of ghost and machine sums to, well, what you see is what you get.

http://www.sciforums.com/the-perception-...52326.html

What is your take on this non local Pickle?

Seems to me that when one steps off of that cliff's edge the reality switch being on or off will soon not REALLY matter.