Bring4th

Full Version: kabbalah and Law of One?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
hi,
Seriously off-topic question.

What does the Law of One say about kabbalah?

BigSmile
(11-01-2009, 06:55 PM)carrie Wrote: [ -> ]hi,
Seriously off-topic question.

What does the Law of One say about kabbalah?

BigSmile

Hi, Carrie.

It's not off-topic. If you go to the L/L site http://llresearch.org/home.aspx
and search for it you'll find several references to it.
I haven't studied this connection yet. P, are there specific quotes that you feel would be good starting places?
(11-02-2009, 01:30 AM)Questioner Wrote: [ -> ]I haven't studied this connection yet. P, are there specific quotes that you feel would be good starting places?

Sorry, I can't be of much help here. I've never studied Kabbalah.

There are periodic references to a couple of the sephirot, but I don't recall any in-depth exegesis by either Ra or Q'uo.

Ra says (to the best of my recollection) that it is one means to understanding the archetypal mind, the Tarot & Astrology being the other two I recall being mentioned.

Essentially, these are systems of pathways and signposts into mind on the code level (as in computer code). They are ways of viewing the forces behind the appearance of consensual reality. One can use this understand to better focus one's "pattern energy expenditure," to use a Ra-ism.
(11-01-2009, 06:55 PM)carrie Wrote: [ -> ]What does the Law of One say about kabbalah?

Unless you're coming from Christian Cabbalah or Hermetic Qabbalah, the 22 Hebrew letter-path's are a central aspect to Kabbalah. On this subject, Ra is pretty straight forward.

Ra Wrote:74.17 Questioner: I assume that the reason that the rituals that have been used previously are of effect is that these words have built a bias in consciousness of those who have worked in these areas so that those who are of a distortion of mind that we seek will respond to imprint in consciousness of this series of words. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is, to a great extent, correct. The exception is the sounding of some of what you call your Hebrew and some of what you call you Sanskrit vowels. These sound vibration complexes have power before time and space and represent configurations of light which built all that there is.

74.19 Questioner: How did the users of these sounds, Sanskrit and Hebrew, determine what these sounds were?

Ra: I am Ra. In the case of the Hebrew that entity known as Yahweh aided this knowledge through impression upon the material of genetic coding which became language, as you call it.

In the case of Sanskrit the sound vibrations are pure due to the lack of previous, what you call, alphabet or letter-naming. Thus the sound vibration complexes seemed to fall into place as from the Logos. This was a more, shall we say, natural or unaided situation or process.

75.25 Questioner: You spoke in a previous session about certain Hebrew and Sanskrit sound vibratory complexes being powerful because they were mathematically related to that which was the creation. Could you expand on this understanding as to how these are linked?

Ra: I am Ra. As we previously stated the linkage is mathematical or that of the ratio you may consider musical. There are those whose mind complex activities would attempt to resolve this mathematical ratio but at present the coloration of the intoned vowel is part of the vibration which cannot be accurately measured. However, it is equivalent to types of rotation of your primary material particles.