10-15-2012, 12:22 PM
Has anyone here read Abd Rushin's work: "In The Light of Truth"?
In my estimation, it is a very compelling and comprehensive set of lectures compiled into three large books which I think very many parts were difficult to grasp back in 1995 and then again in 2007. After reading the Law of One, I went back to check the similarities in many of the chapters, both the easy and difficult ones.
I have seen some similarities but they seem incomplete and I noticed that the differences are stark when they occur.
In The Light Of Truth is a much older compilation than The Ra Material and seems surer. And while I think that the "entity" or the writer (incarnate) came from a dimension/density much higher than ours, it is also possible that he was just channeling like Carla.
However, I think that for anybody that is really seeking, the work of Abd Rushin is a good basis for comparison. I believe a lot of the not so easy to understand bits are not different from what Ra was communicating through Carla.
The reason I am not mentioning any specifics here is because I do not want to color your perception before you read it.
I wish the book was available online for free so that all can read and express their opinions for possibly a collective or individual benefit. Perhaps if you live near a large and very liberal library, you may find the three volumes there.
You may want to skip the chapters which discuss what you or many may consider regular material and go straight to those that seem to present some Ra concepts in not so similar language.
A lot of the easy to understand chapters and concepts are fluidly interwoven with their metaphysical explanations or equivalent.
There are some chapters that cast great doubt on -should i say, the intent of Ra.
It is serious, spiritually severe when pondered and beautifully consistent from beginning to end...
I would be very happy to know that someone on these "forums" has read it and can make comments I can learn from.
Also if someone could ask Carla to ask about Abd Rushin when she is channeling, that would just be the perfect, most superior icing on the cake.
Meanwhile I must state again as a person new to the Law of One, I have found some of the things I read most liberating.
I ask most humbly with gratitude to all that may undertake this comparison.
It will be sweeter if you can suspend all previously held concepts on religion even though the writer was not peddling any religion or religious concepts whatsoever
Thank you
In my estimation, it is a very compelling and comprehensive set of lectures compiled into three large books which I think very many parts were difficult to grasp back in 1995 and then again in 2007. After reading the Law of One, I went back to check the similarities in many of the chapters, both the easy and difficult ones.
I have seen some similarities but they seem incomplete and I noticed that the differences are stark when they occur.
In The Light Of Truth is a much older compilation than The Ra Material and seems surer. And while I think that the "entity" or the writer (incarnate) came from a dimension/density much higher than ours, it is also possible that he was just channeling like Carla.
However, I think that for anybody that is really seeking, the work of Abd Rushin is a good basis for comparison. I believe a lot of the not so easy to understand bits are not different from what Ra was communicating through Carla.
The reason I am not mentioning any specifics here is because I do not want to color your perception before you read it.
I wish the book was available online for free so that all can read and express their opinions for possibly a collective or individual benefit. Perhaps if you live near a large and very liberal library, you may find the three volumes there.
You may want to skip the chapters which discuss what you or many may consider regular material and go straight to those that seem to present some Ra concepts in not so similar language.
A lot of the easy to understand chapters and concepts are fluidly interwoven with their metaphysical explanations or equivalent.
There are some chapters that cast great doubt on -should i say, the intent of Ra.
It is serious, spiritually severe when pondered and beautifully consistent from beginning to end...
I would be very happy to know that someone on these "forums" has read it and can make comments I can learn from.
Also if someone could ask Carla to ask about Abd Rushin when she is channeling, that would just be the perfect, most superior icing on the cake.
Meanwhile I must state again as a person new to the Law of One, I have found some of the things I read most liberating.
I ask most humbly with gratitude to all that may undertake this comparison.
It will be sweeter if you can suspend all previously held concepts on religion even though the writer was not peddling any religion or religious concepts whatsoever
Thank you