12-02-2012, 04:08 AM
In Book III, Session 57:
Ra: I am Ra. Your assumption is correct. If the shape is of appropriate size it may be placed directly beneath the cushion of the head or the pallet upon which the body complex rests.
We again caution that the third spiral of upward lining light, that which is
emitted from the apex of this shape, is most deleterious to an entity in
overdose and should not be used over-long.
Questioner: What would the height be, in centimeters, of one of these
pyramids for best functioning?
Ra: I am Ra. It matters not. Only the proportion of the height of the
pyramid from base to apex to the perimeter of the base is at all important.
Questioner: What should that proportion be?
Ra: I am Ra. This proportion should be the 1.16 which you may observe.
Questioner: Do you mean that the sum of the four base sides should be 1.16 of the height of the pyramid?
In Book III, Session 66
Questioner: You mentioned the problems with the action in the King’s
Chamber of the Giza-type pyramid. I am assuming if we used the same
geometrical configuration that is used in the pyramid at Giza this would be
perfectly all right for the pyramid placed beneath the head since we
wouldn’t be using the King’s Chamber radiations but only the third spiral
from the top, and I’m also asking if it would be better to use a 60° apex
angle than the larger apex angle? Would it provide a better energy source?
Ra: I am Ra. For energy through the apex angle the Giza pyramid offers an
excellent model. Simply be sure the pyramid is so small that there is no
entity small enough to crawl inside it.
The first quote seems to suggest the optimal dimension for a energizing pyramid is 1.16 (sum of the four base/height), which gives a rather sharp pyramid. The second quote suggests Giza to be a good dimension for energizing. But Giza pyramid is not nearly as sharp as the optimal one. If I am to make a small pyramid, should I just go with the 1.16 dimension?
Ra: I am Ra. Your assumption is correct. If the shape is of appropriate size it may be placed directly beneath the cushion of the head or the pallet upon which the body complex rests.
We again caution that the third spiral of upward lining light, that which is
emitted from the apex of this shape, is most deleterious to an entity in
overdose and should not be used over-long.
Questioner: What would the height be, in centimeters, of one of these
pyramids for best functioning?
Ra: I am Ra. It matters not. Only the proportion of the height of the
pyramid from base to apex to the perimeter of the base is at all important.
Questioner: What should that proportion be?
Ra: I am Ra. This proportion should be the 1.16 which you may observe.
Questioner: Do you mean that the sum of the four base sides should be 1.16 of the height of the pyramid?
In Book III, Session 66
Questioner: You mentioned the problems with the action in the King’s
Chamber of the Giza-type pyramid. I am assuming if we used the same
geometrical configuration that is used in the pyramid at Giza this would be
perfectly all right for the pyramid placed beneath the head since we
wouldn’t be using the King’s Chamber radiations but only the third spiral
from the top, and I’m also asking if it would be better to use a 60° apex
angle than the larger apex angle? Would it provide a better energy source?
Ra: I am Ra. For energy through the apex angle the Giza pyramid offers an
excellent model. Simply be sure the pyramid is so small that there is no
entity small enough to crawl inside it.
The first quote seems to suggest the optimal dimension for a energizing pyramid is 1.16 (sum of the four base/height), which gives a rather sharp pyramid. The second quote suggests Giza to be a good dimension for energizing. But Giza pyramid is not nearly as sharp as the optimal one. If I am to make a small pyramid, should I just go with the 1.16 dimension?