08-13-2013, 04:23 AM
how do you understand these two terms?
not that there can ever be two definitions that apply for all people at all times, but emotions seem to have a sharper, more temporary quality (things that flare up like anger or indignation), and feelings tend more towards longer term biases, like affection or dislike for a person or a thing, an attitude that develops over multiple experiences.
regardless, its seems that both these things (emotions and feelings) are very good feedback for the self to see the self (after all, the mind tends to be a somewhat 'intangable thing') so its useful to have all kinds of feedback on what its doing.
- -
this is what Ra offers on the process of daily (diurnal) analysis:
what does 'inappropriate' mean here?
not that there can ever be two definitions that apply for all people at all times, but emotions seem to have a sharper, more temporary quality (things that flare up like anger or indignation), and feelings tend more towards longer term biases, like affection or dislike for a person or a thing, an attitude that develops over multiple experiences.
regardless, its seems that both these things (emotions and feelings) are very good feedback for the self to see the self (after all, the mind tends to be a somewhat 'intangable thing') so its useful to have all kinds of feedback on what its doing.
- -
this is what Ra offers on the process of daily (diurnal) analysis:
Quote:42.11 Ra: I am Ra. The thoughts of an entity, its feelings or emotions, and least of all its behavior are the signposts for the teaching/learning of self by self. In the analysis of one’s experiences of a diurnal cycle an entity may assess what it considers to be inappropriate thoughts, behaviors, feelings, and emotions.
In examining these inappropriate activities of mind, body, and spirit complexes the entity may then place these distortions in the proper vibrational ray and thus see where work is needed.
what does 'inappropriate' mean here?