06-04-2014, 11:00 AM
one of my greatest fears when I was growing up was that society was not going to change, or that it wasn't changing fast enough.
I ended up projecting these fears and hopes onto the ever changing cycle of computer technology. Intel had cpu's for the home market which began with the 8086, which progressed through various iterations until we ended up with the dual and quad core powerful processors that we have today in most computers.
the basic issue was, however, that I didn't know how to grow and change myself, how to adapt to circumstances.
this was felt internally as 'stagnancy'; with the hopes that outside things ('computer technology') represented the next change, and that the next pc I bought, or the next component that I upgraded would enable me to become more 'complete', 'able', and 'functional'. Tech represented progress for me because it was a concrete example of having more processing power.
- -
the heart of the issue, in truth, was the ability to recognise, use, and apply catalyst. I was never really taught how to 'think', how to process my emotions and feelings, or how to understand and accept myself.
When days ended up being 'good', it didn't feel like I had a hand in that happening (was it because of something I did, or was it just pure luck), and when days ended up being bad, I didn't know how to change it, and I was just stuck with my moods and disgruntlement and grumpiness. I didn't have the means to navigate or steer my life in any true way. This was not just because of the fact that I was still growing up, it was more that I didn't know how to process experience; at least not in the way that I do today.
one can definitely examine periods of one's life and come to the conclusion of Stagnancy. That things aren't changing, or they aren't changing fast enough.
- -
The Balancing View to that is represented in Archetype 13; which Ra gives the name 'Death'. Now, this card has traditionally scared off many people, as death is taken to be literal and final; and that is the most common and concrete association with this word.
Ra calls the Death Archetype the 'Transformation of the Body'.
As an explanation:
the part in bold is truly one of the most powerful and searing statements that you might ever come across.
one can unpack it in two parts:
1) opportunity given: "each moment and certainly each diurnal period of the bodily incarnation offers death and rebirth"
2) taking the opportunity: "to one which is attempting to use the catalyst which is offered it."
I think that if this is able to be appreciated deeply, and one is able to use catalyst moment by moment, and day by day, then the resulting effects are an energetic reconfiguration of the self at the bodily level to represent the more whole state of mind via use of the offered catalyst.
The Transformation of the Body becomes concrete.
one can then see how this is a countervailing view to the notion of Stagnancy. That things don't change (because I don't know how to change them, or that is, I don't know how to apply the moment-by-moment catalyst).
truly one can come to the valid conclusion of stagnancy. But it doesn't have to be that way. Catalyst, as always, shows the way forward - if you just know how to recognise it and apply it to the self.
I ended up projecting these fears and hopes onto the ever changing cycle of computer technology. Intel had cpu's for the home market which began with the 8086, which progressed through various iterations until we ended up with the dual and quad core powerful processors that we have today in most computers.
the basic issue was, however, that I didn't know how to grow and change myself, how to adapt to circumstances.
this was felt internally as 'stagnancy'; with the hopes that outside things ('computer technology') represented the next change, and that the next pc I bought, or the next component that I upgraded would enable me to become more 'complete', 'able', and 'functional'. Tech represented progress for me because it was a concrete example of having more processing power.
- -
the heart of the issue, in truth, was the ability to recognise, use, and apply catalyst. I was never really taught how to 'think', how to process my emotions and feelings, or how to understand and accept myself.
When days ended up being 'good', it didn't feel like I had a hand in that happening (was it because of something I did, or was it just pure luck), and when days ended up being bad, I didn't know how to change it, and I was just stuck with my moods and disgruntlement and grumpiness. I didn't have the means to navigate or steer my life in any true way. This was not just because of the fact that I was still growing up, it was more that I didn't know how to process experience; at least not in the way that I do today.
one can definitely examine periods of one's life and come to the conclusion of Stagnancy. That things aren't changing, or they aren't changing fast enough.
- -
The Balancing View to that is represented in Archetype 13; which Ra gives the name 'Death'. Now, this card has traditionally scared off many people, as death is taken to be literal and final; and that is the most common and concrete association with this word.
Ra calls the Death Archetype the 'Transformation of the Body'.
As an explanation:
Quote:81.13 Questioner: [We have] already discussed the Significator, so I will skip to number thirteen. Transformation of Body is called Death, for with death the body is transformed to a higher-vibration body for additional learning. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct and may be seen to be additionally correct in that each moment and certainly each diurnal period of the bodily incarnation offers death and rebirth to one which is attempting to use the catalyst which is offered it.
the part in bold is truly one of the most powerful and searing statements that you might ever come across.
one can unpack it in two parts:
1) opportunity given: "each moment and certainly each diurnal period of the bodily incarnation offers death and rebirth"
2) taking the opportunity: "to one which is attempting to use the catalyst which is offered it."
I think that if this is able to be appreciated deeply, and one is able to use catalyst moment by moment, and day by day, then the resulting effects are an energetic reconfiguration of the self at the bodily level to represent the more whole state of mind via use of the offered catalyst.
The Transformation of the Body becomes concrete.
one can then see how this is a countervailing view to the notion of Stagnancy. That things don't change (because I don't know how to change them, or that is, I don't know how to apply the moment-by-moment catalyst).
truly one can come to the valid conclusion of stagnancy. But it doesn't have to be that way. Catalyst, as always, shows the way forward - if you just know how to recognise it and apply it to the self.