(10-18-2012, 04:48 PM)Oceania Wrote: what's low ego strength? how do you fix it?

(10-18-2012, 05:56 PM)rie Wrote: I'm not judging you. I have no clue who you are and neither do I claim to know. I just know/feel your emotional charge zapping.

(10-19-2012, 05:45 PM)rie Wrote: I go with resonance and openness when looking at the numerous works out there, e.g., developing hypotheses that are relatively tentative so that it may be refined continuously so as not to lock into something so strongly.

I look at L/L Research and how it generously provides information (for free) and it vibrates a collaborative and love/light based energy is very special. I just believe true powerfulness is subtle, soft, and malleable. That's what L/L Research represents for me.

When there is lots of personality in a work, it takes away from the learning because the person/teacher comes out very strongly. Yet, it is also a great learning experience to see people change (great mirror) and brings validation to our shared experience, etc.,. Personality becomes rather distracting because we could potentially identify with it and get stuck at that aspect.

So... not to compare any person/organization, but there is something remarkable when someone's work comes from a community of beings with shared goals. My vision for the future is sort of along this line... that as we mature spiritually, the focus is collaborative, communal, and subtle with intent focused on giving unconditionally.

(10-19-2012, 05:51 PM)Cyan Wrote: ...
Might be just my crazyness though.

(06-18-2010, 05:58 AM)unity100 Wrote:

(06-18-2010, 04:33 AM)Namaste Wrote: The future is constantly being written, he could have well read the highest probability vortex at that time. For that reason alone, I would not give too much weight to predictions.

Regarding his channeling, I did hear (on the Sons of the Law of One website) a session from him, channeling Ra. There were a few personal phrases that he uses blended in, but, in his defence, that's what you get with light to medium trances (conscious channeling), as the thought forms are relayed by the personality of the channeler (the voice box is not controlled as it is with unconscious/deep trance channeling).

the general tone and information that was out of his channelings were way out of touch anything resembling Ra.

in case you remember, Ra said that the Ra contact was done over a very narrow band. and Carla had very particular pre-incarnative conditions that was chosen to make it easier for her to get into trance and enable such a contact. and, throughout the work that was made for four books, you can read the difficulties, dedication they had to maintain and the effort they had to spare to keep the contact going. AND it was possible because of the extensive harmony within the group of that three people.

i do not think that it is a willy nilly affair to do that channeling consciously, even now.

from what i understand, q'uo contact is also being made by getting into trance.

moreover, the tone of his contact and messages resemble more a 4 density channeling, beridden with personal gratification and praise, than any higher density entity. the measure of hope and positivity in the messages is a lot. even leaving aside the degrading effect of personal gratification, one should remember that 4d entities can be naive, and can keep exaggerated hopes regarding anything.

Quote:There is a lot of personal beliefs in his work. This is the point of life though, he has his opinions and is sharing them, it's up to each person to use discernment as to whether it resonates with them or not.

he came up as a topic in another discussion forum. people were bashing him. despite my impression i have kept a moderate ground and told there was nothing wrong about giving hope to people. someone said that, because of the hopes he have given about the disclosure before, he believed him, and got frustrated. he probably also experienced some humiliation if he told about it to other people too, tho he didnt say.

it is wrong to give extravagant hopes regarding anything like that. it is not as simple as 'it is up to people if it resonates with them or not'. he is not giving timeless, all encompassing general messages of love or hope. he is talking about events to happen in future.

it may resonate with some people, those people may make decisions, or life changing decisions based on those messages, and may end up frustrated the least, or worse. thats a disservice.

---

(06-18-2010, 04:42 AM)MtDoraGuy Wrote: Another thing, David firmly believes he is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce.  I'm not sure how that distortion colors the picture, as he didn't speak about it that weekend, but it must in some degree.  I assume.

well, i dont think he is right even on that front too. he does say that, but his messages, channelings dont come close to edgar cayce's either, in tone or content.

.............

on another note, he seems to be an individual with ego issues. 'reincarnation of edgar cayce', 'channeler of Ra', 2 most prominent spiritual message sources of modern times, a predictor of events, a singer (he recently put out a single i believe), a speaker and so on.

he pretty much acts like an adolescent celebrity, in the words of someone who was in the discussion in the other forum i saw this topic came up.

(04-11-2017, 01:22 AM)sjel Wrote: So I guess turns out it's gradual