![]() |
|
What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Strictly Law of One Material (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? (/showthread.php?tid=18585) |
RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Scah - 10-02-2020 JW, I have the same observation as you do. I am actually very curious how a topic talking about Jim would belong to strictly Law of One material. And the OP content most definitely doesn't belong to this section though the replies from others are (Aion, your deep dive into LOO materials are always a treat to me). Personally, I find this discussion, especially the OP from Peregrine very much against LOO material where time and time again LOO indicates that EVERYONE is Creator and that there are potential serious distortions when an individual Entity is idolized and worshiped. Though the OP hasn't come to the degree of worshiping, there are definitely signs of the beginning of some serious idolizing. And as you have mentioned, on top of Peregrine trying to distract and veil this through fine articulation and poetic language when others responding to the thread gently points this out in various way, the tone and content of Peregrine's replies to others fall directly under Peregrine's own definition of "de-tuning". It's very baffling to me why this is happening. I can't help but wondering what is happening. Peregrine started a discussion that if the forum should be closed due to digression and "De-tuning" and while that conversation is still going on, Peregrine did the exact things that Peregrine has the most concern about. JW thank you for sharing your observation. I thought I was the only person with this observation. And of course all of these are just my observations through my own perspective. I sincerely want to be wrong about this. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Infinite - 10-02-2020 I see the three aspects of the magical personality (Love, Wisdom and Power) as being linked to the green, blue and indigo energy centers respectively. Ra placed a lot of importance on the indigo ray as that ray that represents infinite possibilities to the adept. That would be power in my view. In addition to the fact that through this ray, which is the level of intelligent energy in the microcosm, intelligent infinity can be contacted and many psychic abilities are acquired. In the sources of yoga it's said that when the kundalini reaches the third eye, many siddhis (paranormal powers) are conquered. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-02-2020 (10-02-2020, 10:44 AM)Scah Wrote: JW, RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-02-2020 (10-02-2020, 11:07 AM)Infinite Wrote: I see the three aspects of the magical personality (Love, Wisdom and Power) as being linked to the green, blue and indigo energy centers respectively. Ra placed a lot of importance on the indigo ray as that ray that represents infinite possibilities to the adept. That would be power in my view. Yes, if you are looking to make such associations, I think it makes a lot more sense the way you describe it than to associate them with yellow, green & blue. In order to create the perfect context for the Ra Contact, yellow ray energy isn't of any great importance. Whereas strength and clarity of the indigo is critical because this is Ra's home ray, if you will. Since you bring up kundalini practices, for the lineages that developed those practices some centuries before and after 1000 AD, the study of various levels of power was very important. The lovely thing about the Ra Material is that it doesn't get bogged down in the transient material on this topic, but goes right into the highest uses of such practices. Quote:74.8 Questioner: Would you answer it please? RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-02-2020 Aion, thanks for thoughtfully throwing all these puzzle pieces up onto the table. I'll respond in piecemeal fashion in the hope that someday these shards will recognize the Infinite Intelligence within them and assemble themselves into something coherent. Quote:Oh, to your point of forces all "unifying", I'm actually not convinced there are "separate forces", but rather different aspects of a single force, just like I think matter, sound and light are all the same thing operating at different vibratory levels. Yes, I think we're view the same thing, but from different lines of approach. Quote:As for whether or not Jim brought 'lessons of power' from others lives, I can't really say. As stated, this is unprovable. You may think of this idea as a kind of phantom puzzle piece that may fit somewhere at a later time. Quote:That being said, I think "spiritual gravity" is constantly present, even the planet has it. Yes, "crystallization" is perhaps a better description of the synthesis (in this case of Light and Love as studied in 6D), but the gravitational power I'm speaking of, I think, is a outcome of the intensified power of will-cum-faith. It's the interactions of these two refined elements which describe the ability of the adept to do work......or at least I would go out on a limb to say so at this point in time. Quote:So, I probably seem like I'm just repeating myself a bunch, but frankly, so does Ra. Very amusing. Ra was at the mercy of the questioner in that respect. The rest of us are at the mercy other limitations. Quote:When you're talking about that "movement towards the Creator" this is described by Ra as the "upwards spiraling light" and it emerges in third-density. Personally, I view the upward spiraling as the general inevitable coursing of Infinity-in-finite-form back to Infinity beyond form, and the gravitational element as an actual force, not a general path or concept or yellow brick road. Quote: All of these suggest to me entities learning how to use love with wisdom in order to direct their own distortions of light towards greater realization of the self as Creator. Right, I'm just trying to articulate the process a little bit, get under the hood and see what's happening inside that black box, to recklessly mix metaphors. Your chosen quote: Quote:15.22 Questioner: You also said that you offered the Law of One, which is the balancing of love/light and light/love. Is there any difference between love/light and light/love? This is why I was squishy above about the combination of crystallized love+wisdom and will+faith being the means allowing an individual with adept characteristics to do work in consciousness. It's not wrong on one level, but the above quote speaks to the higher order, impersonal simultaneous reality of such things. Quote:What is very worth noting though is that most of Ra's 'sign offs' include "the power and the peace of the One Creator". My sense is that is meant as "may the Creatrix's force be with you," i.e., take comfort in her energy and presence. Quote:So, I think it's a preeeetty broad question to ask, what good can a 6D entity get from 3D? Wouldn't that depend entirely on the particular entity? I'm not sure any two are working on the exact same balance. Okay, this topic is begging for its own thread. Second point first, definitely, most of what we consider to be our personality are defense mechanisms which have absolutely no purpose in time/space. So, they just fly out the proverbial window. As I'm sure you will recall, the benefit of a 6D being incarnating into a zoo such as this has to do with learning lessons of balancing love ant light. So, if my personality is preeeeettty much irrelevant, then what are we talking about? Good question. Let's leave that for a different discussion. Quote:For me, divinity and unity are one and the same, if that helps clarify at all. Nope, that doesn't help me at all. I still don't really understand a doggone thing!!!! RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Aion - 10-02-2020 A couple of your statements here I would "challenge", one from your response Infinte: Quote:In order to create the perfect context for the Ra Contact, yellow ray energy isn't of any great importance. I think that's not quite true. The yellow ray is the "great stepping stone" according to Ra. Quote:39.10 Questioner: I sense that there is fruitful ground for investigation of our development in tracing the evolution of the bodily energy centers because these seven centers seem to be linked with all of the sevens that I spoke of previously and be central to our own development. Could you describe the process of evolution of these bodily energy centers starting with the most primitive form of life to have them? "Mind/body potentiates to its fullest balance", that seems pretty dang important to me. Strong lower rays "springboard" one in to the green, so having those lower three in order seems pretty valuable to a positive. This means that for each of the trio having to be 'minimally balance' which I think we can assume they likely were, that includes the yellow ray. Ra says multiple times that it's the overall balance between the centers that is important, not each individual, and so that means they are all vital to the balance. Honestly from a few of your posts it kind of seems like you've got a bit of a bias against yellow ray. Which I totally don't get. It seems strange to me that you are suggesting some energy centers are more important than others. Quote:Second point first, definitely, most of what we consider to be our personality are defense mechanisms which have absolutely no purpose in time/space. That seems like a jump to nihilism. Yes the personality dissolves, but I do think it has a purpose as the 'resonant chamber' for the Higher Self to echo in to. I disagree it is some "defense mechanism", more like a temporary Avatar. Also, Ra distinguishes between physical gravity and spiritual gravity, but what kind of "force" are you talking about exactly? Ra describes an "attraction towards seeking the Creator", what kind of "spiritual force" would that entail? I did not describe the upward spiraling light as a metaphor, the quote I put basically states what you state. It is the Light, I'm not sure what's confusing about that? But you are throwing a lot of concepts all together here. For example, talking about a 3D adepts use of love and wisdom balanced by power is a totally different subject from talking about a 6D entity benefiting from 3D. I thought you were talking about the latter as you've framed it that way, now it seems more like you're asking about 3D adepts? In any case, we seem to have a mutual lack of understanding for what that's worth. Also, I would say, though I do disagree on points, I don't discount your considerations and I'm sure you're working on some puzzle for yourself here. Don't mean to come across as shooting down your ideas. I may just as very well be wrong. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Aion - 10-02-2020 Actually, since we're talking about adepts.... Quote:75.23 Questioner: I am sorry for the confusion. Sometimes, as you say, sound vibration complexes are not very adequate, and I’m sorry. The issue I see with trying to pin down the mechanics of adept work is that "love and wisdom" are qualities, whereas work is usually define through quantities. Even saying "how much love" and "how much wisdom" doesn't really make any sense to me whatsoever. If we look at the material, both positive and negative entities learn love and wisdom and power, yet the negatives are able to do it without the green ray, so it can't be that rigid of a structure... RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Jade - 10-02-2020 Just for consideration, I'd like to add this other quote that Ra offers re: the power that Jim manifests. Quote:99.5 Questioner: Finally, of the preliminary questions, one from Jim stating, “For the last three weeks I have often been at the edge of anger and frustration, have had a nearly constant dull pain at my indigo-ray center, and have felt quite drained of energy. Would Ra comment on the source of these experiences and any thoughts or actions that might alleviate it?” RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Aion - 10-02-2020 I was looking for that one, thanks for posting! RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Infinite - 10-02-2020 (10-02-2020, 11:35 AM)peregrine Wrote: Yes, if you are looking to make such associations, I think it makes a lot more sense the way you describe it than to associate them with yellow, green & blue. In order to create the perfect context for the Ra Contact, yellow ray energy isn't of any great importance. In reality, all energy centers are important, as they are all part of the same system. The adept is someone who has minimally cleaned and balanced the chakras up to the third eye and is working at that level. As Ra said, this center requires more work to open. However, without clean red to blue chakras, it's not possible to have a balanced work in what I call adepthood. I see the seven main centers as parts of a melody. If all of them are not evenly balanced, the melody will not be harmonious. There is no building without a foundation. The lower triad cannot be underestimated or ignored. It makes sense for me to relate the yellow chakra to power, but it's a power within the group. That is why Ra related it to the ego, it's the settlement of the self-awareness third-density personality that identifies itself as a part of society. Although it seems to me that the most important ray is green (due to the vibration of the fourth density), they all need to be properly balanced. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Aion - 10-02-2020 Also found this tasty nugget: Quote:92.13 Questioner: Thank you. Third: Just as free will taps intelligent infinity which yields intelligent energy which then focuses and creates the densities of this octave of experience, the Potentiator of Mind utilizes its connection with intelligent energy and taps or potentiates the Matrix of the Mind which yields Catalyst of the Mind. Is this correct? You see here an ancient symbol of two hands reaching out for one another. This is the analogy I would use for the reaching of the adept up towards Creator and the reaching down towards the self of the Creator and the Higher Self. I think this is the value of any higher dimensional entity "visiting" 3D. It is only then that the hands may clasp. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-02-2020 Well, this is become a tangled mess, yet still somehow, engaging. Honestly, I'm having trouble keeping it all straight, but I'll attempt to respond. (This instrument's brain is wearing thin.) So-Called Yellow Ray Of course, it's indispensable in the developement of consciousness. No argument there. What I was trying to claim in the answer to Infinity is that, when you think of the power needed to channel Ra, highly developed yellow ray energy is minimally essential compared to highly developed indigo ray energy. Perhaps you disagree with this, I'm just trying to clarify my statement. Second, Ra refers specifically to Jim's physical energy, and this does not rule out my assertion, it seems to moi. So, I don't see that any of us have proven anything. I was offering the idea because its a line investigation someone else may someday wish to explore. Personality I said "most" of it eventually goes out the window, and I suggest this is because what remains from an incarnation, eventually, are the deep impulses, biases and other such things which make up the spiritual work we do in incarnation. And much (perhaps you'll like "much" much better?) of what we think of as that which defines us falls away. For example, our family identity, social or political identity, etc. drop away, but our deep loves and aversions and our identity in spirit follow us. I think there's a Ra quote describing this. I'll look later. BINGO! Aion Wrote:Ra describes an "attraction towards seeking the Creator", what kind of "spiritual force" would that entail? Maybe you can tell me? Aion Wrote:For example, talking about a 3D adepts use of love and wisdom balanced by power is a totally different subject from talking about a 6D entity benefiting from 3D.Please say more about this. Don't they converge over time for a 6D wanderer? RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-02-2020 This conversation is making me think of the ensemble scenes in Mozart's The Marriage of Figaro where characters are singing simultaneously about the same events, but with vastly different perceptions and motivations, i.e., they're flying in the same airspace, but all on very different trajectories. I guess that's what makes it interesting...on some level.... RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Aion - 10-02-2020 (10-02-2020, 02:57 PM)peregrine Wrote: Well, this is become a tangled mess, yet still somehow, engaging. Honestly, I'm having trouble keeping it all straight, but I'll attempt to respond. (This instrument's brain is wearing thin.) Oh I don't think anybody is proving anything today, or most days for that matter, lol. We're all just speculating from the great capacity of our skull goo. For that I would say I actually think the trio fit together like a combination of musical chords. So it's not so much the exact strength or balance they each had, it was the collective harmony that was created when they vibrated together. As a musician, I know that things don't have to be "perfect" for things to resonate because of sympathetic resonance. The group was vibrating together in such a way that they were able to be in sympathetic vibration with Ra, thus the contact was formed. That is how telepathy works, through sympathetic vibration. Thus, each was exactly as they needed to be for the contact to ensue and anything different in any of the three wouldn't have enabled that harmonic chord to take place. As for your final question, it may sound weird but that is a strangely personal one for me. The consideration reminds me of much. Yes, I would say over time there is a convergence, but there is still the forgetting. You must understand, most 3D minds cannot handle the vast reserve of experience that is possessed by the 6D. To undertake a wandering is a huge responsibility to the self and to others and in 6D is not a choice that is undertaken lightly. This is because you could potentially lose all of your progress, get sucked in to negative space and have to spend another aeon working your way out. This is surely a mild inconvenience to the being of timelessness, but it's a daunting thought for a being in time/space and space/time. In that case, there are only two benefits I know of. The positive polarity wanders in order to have a chance at making a large movement towards reuniting itself with the Creator through the deep catalytic interaction with other portions of the Creator. The negative wanders in order to find the truth. This almost always happens just before the moment where they face that wall of unity and cannot go further. They are sure they must have missed something, some answer, some way through this impassable barrier. So they risk the forgetting to find an answer. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Aion - 10-02-2020 Oh as for what kind of "force" we are describing. How do you describe the attraction to light? Magnetic? I don't think that quite describes it. Like being pulled in to gravity? Maybe that's why they use the term spiritual gravity. I think it is this "Matrix of the Mind is that which reaches just as the kinetic phase of intelligent infinity, through free will, reaches for the Logos". It is Intelligent Infinity reaching out to us through intelligent energy, as we strive back towards it. The One, becoming Two, becoming One. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-02-2020 (10-02-2020, 03:13 PM)Aion Wrote: I think it is this "Matrix of the Mind is that which reaches just as the kinetic phase of intelligent infinity, through free will, reaches for the Logos". Thinking back over this little repartee, I think I see--maybe--why you and I have been oriented so differently to the subject. The reaching you're describing above is the beginning of the return trip back to Infinity, whereas my focus is on a much later stage, to wit, the unity culmination approaching the apex of 6D. (Well, that's what my internal sensors indicate, for whatever value that may be.) RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Jade - 10-02-2020 For me it's just possible that it was a firm grounding in the "physical" rays (Jim), the strong heart (Carla), and the search for truth (Don) that combined to open the gateway to intelligent infinity. I think precisely it was that none of them had the key to the gateway already open that the three of them came together harmoniously to pierce the veil together. I think there is something to be said for the heart being "the most essential" (as it is the center of the body complex and the root of polarity) and hence why Carla handled the brunt of the contact, but this seems to me to be the pattern of achieving the gateway, and I think in this aspect the three embodied the components necessary quite thoroughly and poetically. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - J.W. - 10-02-2020 (10-02-2020, 01:45 AM)peregrine Wrote:(10-02-2020, 01:13 AM)J.W. Wrote: You even admitted at one point on my post, that you want to "challenge" me. The bitterness is a projection behind your own perspective, and you miss the point. I never took on your challenge because it was the same strategy you used to "provoke" others into a forceful, "passive aggressive" debate with you. What you felt from my other comment is a "direct" energy, like I said, I cut out your bs and am having a straight talk with you. I can see your true intention behind the majority of your posts, and it is to "question and challenge everything," a method that promotes "growth" and "evolution" through bellicosity, and friction, (playing "OPFOR").. you do this in a way by overly complex analogies and "twisty" articulation... where you don't even know what mess of an "exchange" you created for other-selves, whom gets entangled with your dialog, and along the way, you cling onto metaphysical responses as if you just landed here from higher density. On top of this, there is a hint of "fetish" that shows you almost seems to "enjoy" this. You like "challenging" people, stirring things up... and I can't help to feel this could have been spawned from your early childhood years, maybe an influence from a overly masculine male in your life? a father? sibling? or a "lack of" could also explain the need for "attention" from your "challenging." to "prove" something about yourself. This lead me to talk to you in a "direct" manner, without courtesy of any sense of "metaphysics" or philosophical "word play." Just a 3D human to another, I'll give you a little bit of my background, I don't know if you see my other posts, but I am a... I deal with a very "colorful" variety of "characters" and their "behavior/patterns." You will be surprise that everyone actually gets "categorized/profiled" because human behaviors and characteristics can actually be identified due to the vast amount of digital data, cases. etc. etc. (in short, there is another person out there with the exact character as you, maybe look a little different, but eat, s*** and talk just like you.) Another way to explain this is using the astrological Zodiacs, each zodiacs has their specific traits, imagine that you came back (reincarnated) in a specific month under a specific sign, because your "soul" needs to work on the negative "traits" of that zodiac in this life time, you will remain under that sign until your next reincarnation. (a class system per se) for your "soul's lessons." Modern psychology and science made astounding connections beyond your imagination, although this is primarily used in sectors of the government and private world that you probably will never hear about, or only when you see the word "personality algorithm" every once in a while. I digress, Back to the topic regarding "you." From an analytic point of view, your approach and demeanor shows that you like "war games." you like to create "discord" but in a "well mannered" and "nice way." My colleagues and I unofficially label characters like yourself as "educated troll," or "energy vampires." Because ultimately, you waste people time and really get nothing anywhere other than the "excitement" you feel from "challenging" others into "word judo" with you. I appreciate the invitation, it is a nice change. Looking forward to meeting you, and no thank you for the alcohol and smoke, maybe in my younger years, where I needed to prove my "masculinity"... then I would have taken the offer. Although I will advise you to be considered of 2nd hand smoke to other-selves, and do that elsewhere if we do talk. Sorry if I came off "cranky," like you said, nothing personal really, I understand where you are coming from, that is why the last time we "exchange" conversation, I wished for whatever is causing hardship in your life to alleviate, so you can stop spilling it over to others in a form of "challenging" them. Take care, RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-03-2020 Thank you for your greeting, other-self. I sincerely wish you love and wisdom and peace in your heart. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Aion - 10-03-2020 (10-02-2020, 04:08 PM)peregrine Wrote:(10-02-2020, 03:13 PM)Aion Wrote: I think it is this "Matrix of the Mind is that which reaches just as the kinetic phase of intelligent infinity, through free will, reaches for the Logos". I mean, you say it's the beginning, but I feel like it carries through the whole journey? Is it not the same force operating the whole way through? Well, then I would ask, to what extent do you think a third density mind is capable of grasping the motivations of sixth density? To the point of an answer, I think that you have the threshold of "looking back". Quote:36.6 Questioner: Then the higher self operates from the future as we understand things. In other words my higher self would operate from what I consider to be my future? Is this correct? So basically, I think the point is where the M/B/S complexes becomes "equal" with its sixth-density higher self, I think that is the point when the "looking back" ends and the entity looks forward towards seventh and foreverness. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-03-2020 (10-03-2020, 01:28 AM)Aion Wrote: I mean, you say it's the beginning, but I feel like it carries through the whole journey? Is it not the same force operating the whole way through? Quote:It is Intelligent Infinity reaching out to us through intelligent energy, as we strive back towards it. The One, becoming Two, becoming One. You're right, I didn't express myself clearly enough. What I was (almost) referring to is that in your pic of the two hands, God's is active while Adam's is passive, i.e., Adam is accepting a spiritual birth of sorts. That's what I meant by the beginning of the return journey. What I've been focusing my intention on in this conversation is the "as we strive back towards it" mentioned above. It's in that context that power (that which individualized consciousness has refined through innumerable incarnative adventures) plays the role I spoke of earlier in balancing Love and Light and, through the balancing of such weighty elements, turning all of that inward and accruing spiritual mass or gravity. So, one part of the story involves becoming invested with divine energy and another part of the story involves careful, steady balancing and energizing of that which was the investment, but which has become an individualized offer to the one Creatrix. My sense is that this occurs in mid 6D and that further work is done in that state prior to leave taking into 7D. And, at the end of the story, you would be quite correct that the power is the same: "One becoming two, becoming One." Can a 3D critter take on the power of 6D? I think probably so, but not while remaining in a body. (Recall the Ra passage about moving about the universe with unfettered tread.) While in a 3D body I think it is possible for a 6D wanderer to become sympathetic to the desired working of one's 6D self in general terms. Personally, I take guidance from this Q'uo session. https://llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/2006/2006_0414.aspx Wrote:In orienting you and those like you to the actual situation, we would ask each to move back in perspective until there is a broadness that takes in all of the third-density pattern. A pattern involves a choice of how to be and how to serve. In third density, the path to graduation involves a simple choice followed by a series of congruent choices which progressively tune the spirit under such discipline to the point where that spirit is able to surrender to love. Thanks for sticking with me through this. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-03-2020 Sorry, this is a bit fragmented, but piling more up on the above, the polarities are not additive, if you will, below mid 6D or so because the + and the - simply cancel one another out and so must remain separate. Why does that change in mid 6D? My sense is that the reconciliation of the polarities has a lot to do with this sort of power I've been discussing, and that this reconciliation has a lot to do with the rapid growth of spiritual mass at that stage of developement. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Plenum - 10-03-2020 Posts have been split into a new tangent: [split] Yellow ray and power/seeking TY RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - dexter101 - 10-04-2020 isnt anyone here gonna speak about the obvious? its one of the things Carla mentioned at the end of one of her books about don and how he felt... i cant believe how noone here has mentioned it. i dont want to be the one to do the honors but i know its at the back of everyones mind. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Patrick - 10-04-2020 It's not in the back of my mind. So feel free to discuss it if you wish to. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Diana - 10-04-2020 (10-04-2020, 04:11 AM)dexter101 Wrote: isnt anyone here gonna speak about the obvious? I did not read Carla's books. So it's not in my mind either. As Patrick said, feel free to explain. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - AnthroHeart - 10-04-2020 Jim McCarty carries LL/Research, so he's pretty important. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Aion - 10-07-2020 (10-03-2020, 02:23 AM)peregrine Wrote:(10-03-2020, 01:28 AM)Aion Wrote: I mean, you say it's the beginning, but I feel like it carries through the whole journey? Is it not the same force operating the whole way through? I suppose I would say that perhaps "striving towards" is ultimately a misnomer, for 'we' already 'have it' and the entire effort is towards remembrance. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Sacred Fool - 10-07-2020 (10-07-2020, 02:13 AM)Aion Wrote: I suppose I would say that perhaps "striving towards" is ultimately a misnomer, for 'we' already 'have it' and the entire effort is towards remembrance. One can say that, and yet it remains a long, long journey through 6D and 7D and.............beyond, We "have it," but it's not always "formatted correctly," if you will. Infinity evidently requires individuated digestion, and that's a lot more work than it may appear at first glance. The following is from January of this year and speaks to the 6D power I was trying to describe. Quo Wrote:Q’uo: I am Q’uo and am aware of your query, my brother. If we understand the query correctly, the lessons of the seventh density are those which have been well-learned in all previous densities so that there is refinement within the seventh density that sees the love of the fourth density, balanced with the wisdom of the fifth density, producing a power of the sixth density, that allows the entity moving into the seventh density to begin to move back into complete unity with the One Infinite Creator through a process that may be seen to be endless in nature. This endless nature of the eternal present, then, becomes a kind of expansion of consciousness to include all of the one infinite creation for each seventh-density entity. RE: What's the Point of Jim McCarty? - Aion - 10-07-2020 Sounds like that fancy spangled crystallization all them kids are talking about. |