+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Science & Technology (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One (/showthread.php?tid=19027)
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 03-28-2021
(03-27-2021, 08:19 PM)Ming the Merciful Wrote: ... If it doesn't prove anything, nothing does. How did you find it? ...
It just came out three days ago in a pretty mainstream place. I was not expecting that sort of thing in such a place. Hence why I believe that our scientists are on the verge of accepting that materialism has been disproven scientifically and empirically. Once scientists are awake to this, the general population will follow.
What will be interesting is to see how they will come up with new experiments to test this further. These will lead to ever more exotic experiments and new physics eventually.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ymarsakar - 03-28-2021
You have the causality reversed.
Scientists are following the general population, 100th monkey effect. Herd immunity. Quantum synchronization, entanglement of the collective jung s unconscious
Therr have been many scientists that have discovered x but they were disappeared suppressed or discredited. This was because the collective refused to know. They exercised their right not to know.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 03-28-2021
Ok if it's reversed then. As long as it manifests one way or another.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 03-28-2021
(03-28-2021, 12:14 PM)Patrick Wrote: Ok if it's reversed then. As long as it manifests one way or another.
Patrick, I hold you responsible for changing my Paradigm. Everything must change, (forthwith). Are we about to see the "Sheep Scenario", when the first sheep jumps over the fence, and all the other sheep follow? It was a good thing I bought goats?
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 03-28-2021
I take my responsibilities. No problem!
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - EvolvingPhoenix - 03-28-2021
No such empirical "smoking gun" evidence exists, nor should it. That defeats the point of the Law of Confusion. Which is WHY it doesn't exist.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 03-28-2021
(03-28-2021, 04:37 PM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: No such empirical "smoking gun" evidence exists, nor should it. That defeats the point of the Law of Confusion. Which is WHY it doesn't exist.
Here is one such evidence talked about in that video.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26468893/
They also discuss how and why all the materialistic hypotheses formulated to explain this are either disproven or not valid (as in not even wrong).
So as of now, for science, the simplest explanation is that we are indeed multiple personalities within a higher mind.
Do not forget that 4d is instreaming. The Law of Confusion is receding. 4d being the density of knowledge.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 03-28-2021
(03-28-2021, 12:45 AM)confusedseeker Wrote: I think the most interesting thing to me in the Law of One was how they mentioned the Physics of Dewey Larson. I wonder if his physics has spurned any new developments?
I wonder if they did not pick it up from the ether? Or, the theory that something is picked-up in the "Collective Consciousness". The "Monkey Scenario". Did you hear about the monkeys somewhere on a Pacific island that started breaking open nuts with stones? The island is remote and has no connection with the outside world. A year later, other monkeys somewhere on the mainland, started breaking nuts with stones. The "Collective Monkey Consciousness". What works for monkeys, also works for humans.
:idea:
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 03-28-2021
(03-28-2021, 04:37 PM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: No such empirical "smoking gun" evidence exists, nor should it. That defeats the point of the Law of Confusion. Which is WHY it doesn't exist.
Chaos and Fate are my two friends. I take them with me everywhere I go. Although according to the "Paradigm Shift", Fate and Chaos do not exist. I shall lose my two best friends. They have been friends all my life. Departing is such sweet sorrow. They are immigrating to another dimension.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ymarsakar - 03-28-2021
(03-28-2021, 04:37 PM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: No such empirical "smoking gun" evidence exists, nor should it. That defeats the point of the Law of Confusion. Which is WHY it doesn't exist.
The veil is lifting. Heyl el the one that created the primary veil, has recalled his fragments.
The dark matrix isrunning onfumes.
These laws are more like distortions.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - LeiwoUnion - 03-29-2021
(03-28-2021, 08:32 PM)Ymarsakar Wrote:(03-28-2021, 04:37 PM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: No such empirical "smoking gun" evidence exists, nor should it. That defeats the point of the Law of Confusion. Which is WHY it doesn't exist.
The veil is lifting. Heyl el the one that created the primary veil, has recalled his fragments.
The dark matrix isrunning onfumes.
These laws are more like distortions.
That kind of 'smoking gun', as EvolvingPhoenix calls it, empirical evidence does exist and is even within grasp of human 3D-4D science (note that true science would be interchangeable with spirituality - so forget the materialistic and dogmatic 'non-science'). EvolvingPhoenix is correct that the first distortion still applies after finding such evidence, however, the wisdom/understanding here is that the 'mystery' of everything would only have been partially revealed, and a new 'smoking gun' that might've been unfathomable previously will begin to be realized. When we go past the first distortion, we are merging with the original thought and no more 'smoking guns' are needed. We are the 'smoking gun'.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ymarsakar - 03-29-2021
There will be resistance because earth govs alreafy use particle tech as weapons. Australia cali fires for example. 2001.
But the balance is heavily on the side of disclosure. Too many herr have chosen the right to know the truth.
Veil: do you really want to know or are you just pretending? Here is a scientist debunking. Still want to know? Here are the sacrifices required to be a dissenter. Still want it?
Like a softwarr program it keeos popping up. This site uses cookies, is that ok?
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 04-02-2021
The "Law of One" is everywhere, (you cannot see the wood for the trees, (metaphors within metaphors)). A Buddha's saying, "When you stop looking for it, you will find it". Perhaps if everybody stopped looking for it, and accepted it, AS IT IS. Then it is in front of you all the time. The biggest mistake that people make about Spirituality, (in its many forms), is that we put it on a pedestal, as if it was something unobtainable. Or, there is a barrier between the Physical Self, and the Spiritual Self, (the delusion). When we accept that Spiritual is our natural nature, except most people, (by habit), observe from the gross physical nature. Observe Spirituality in Everything. Are cats and dogs not Spiritual Beings? Only on a lower level of evolution and Spiritual Awareness. If we treat EVERYTHING from that observation, then there is an acceptance of, (or within), the UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS. The more Science and Philosophical videos I watch on YouTube, and an ever-growing consensus that everything is unified, (in everything), all the pieces of the jigsaw puzzle fits together. If you want to see the perfect example, observe Humanity as a single entity, not as different Cultures and Religion. All Religion is ONE. No matter what is the Philosophical belief. The ONE is the underlying essence permeating all forms of Spirituality. Once you discover the essence, then it is the beginning of Understanding. Once you have achieved the Understanding, the ONE appears as the THING that is binding it all together. Stop looking and just Be, AS IT IS.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 04-06-2021
This goal of theirs is very good. This might be exactly what the Law of One needs in order to become mainstream and completely transform our world.
https://www.essentiafoundation.org/about/
Quote:Essentia Foundation aims at communicating, in an accurate yet accessible way, the latest analytic and scientific indications that metaphysical materialism is fundamentally flawed. Indeed, clear reasoning and the evidence at hand indicate that metaphysical idealism or nondualism—the notion that nature is essentially mental—is the best explanatory model we currently have. This is known in specialist communities, but hasn’t yet been openly communicated, in an accessible manner, to the culture at large. Essentia Foundation hopes to help close this communication gap.
Although we acknowledge that analytic or scientific understanding, in and of itself, isn’t life- or behavior-changing—only felt experience or knowledge by direct acquaintance is—in modern culture the intellect is the bouncer of the heart. Therefore, we aim to create intellectual space and legitimacy for the notion that, at its most fundamental level, all reality unfolds in an extended field of mentation.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 04-07-2021
Hyperspace, Consciousness, and Time with Bernard Carr.
This could very well be the beginnings of mainstream science's inclusion of time/space with space/time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30JTeWttTac&t=2m35s
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 04-07-2021
When have I not agreed with you Patrick? The problem with Science, (and Scientists in general), they consider themselves as the unspoken Religion. If it cannot be proven, it isn't so. In Science is the "Mainstream" and then the "Fundamentalists". Or, the rare Scientists that are dubious about their beliefs and rebel, and then become downtrodden by the Mainstream for going against its dictates. Damned to the Scientific Hell. The point that I have made since joining this "Society of Advance Thinkers", is to observe from a different perspective. Not to accept everything Intellectually, (but Intuitively). I watched an interesting video on YouTube a few days ago, where the person in question said, that until Scientists observe the Universe from an Intuitive Mind, they will never understand the Universe. In other words, allow the Universe to speak to them. That is true on any aspect of Knowledge. One question you can answer? In the "Law of One" writings, is there anything on Intuitive Mind. I have started reading it, and it will takes months to find what I am searching for. Also, how do you transfer the quotes into the Forum. I am confused, dot, com. And I have the audacity to call myself a "Nerd".
So, there are Nerds, (and there are Nerds).
I shall consult my Rabbi.
When in doubt, consult a Rabbi. You think I don't have friends who are Rabbis? If Fate had chosen my life differently, I could writing this as an Orthodox Rabbi, then you would be confused. Then, that is another story. I shall not go into that at this moment. The Mysteries of Life?
Shabbat Shalom.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 04-07-2021
(04-07-2021, 05:17 PM)Ming the Merciful Wrote: ...One question you can answer? In the "Law of One" writings, is there anything on Intuitive...
There is a great deal on that subject. Here are some tidbits for now. I'll comment later on on how to quote stuff.
I got these quotes using the following search parameters.
https://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=Intuitive+Mind&st=all&qo=&lh=aq&qc=0&s=&c=&fp=0&v=e&l=1000&o=s
Ra 19.11 Wrote:Questioner: Can you tell me how this new bodily complex was suited to third-density lessons and what those lessons were?
Ra: I am Ra. There is one necessity for third density. That necessity is self-awareness, or self-consciousness. In order to be capable of such, this chemical complex of body must be capable of the abstract thought. Thus, the fundamental necessity is the combination of rational and intuitive thinking. This was transitory in the second-density forms operating largely upon intuition which proved through practice to yield results.
The third-density mind was capable of processing information in such a way as to think abstractly and in what could be termed “useless” ways, in the sense of survival. This is the primary requisite.
There are other important ingredients: the necessity for a weaker physical vehicle to encourage the use of the mind, the development of the already present awareness of the social complex. These also being necessary: the further development of physical dexterity in the sense of the hand, as you call this portion of your body complex.
Ra 30.2 Wrote:Questioner: Thank you. Would you define mind, body, and spirit separately?
Ra: I am Ra. These terms are all simplistic descriptive terms which equal a complex of energy focuses; the body, as you call it, being the material of the density which you experience at a given space/time or time/space; this complex of materials being available for distortions of what you would call physical manifestation.
The mind is a complex which reflects the inpourings of the spirit and the up-pourings of the body complex. It contains what you know as feelings, emotions, and intellectual thoughts in its more conscious complexities. Moving further down the tree of mind we see the intuition which is of the nature of the mind more in contact or in tune with the total beingness complex. Moving down to the roots of mind we find the progression of consciousness which gradually turns from the personal to the racial memory, to the cosmic influxes, and thus becomes a direct contactor of that shuttle which we call the spirit complex.
This spirit complex is the channel whereby the inpourings from all of the various universal, planetary, and personal inpourings may be funneled into the roots of consciousness and whereby consciousness may be funneled to the gateway of intelligent infinity through the balanced intelligent energy of body and mind.
You will see by this series of definitive statements that mind, body, and spirit are inextricably intertwined and cannot continue, one without the other. Thus we refer to the mind/body/spirit complex rather than attempting to deal with them separately, for the work, shall we say, that you do during your experiences is done through the interaction of these three components, not through any one.
Ra 49.4 Wrote:...I am Ra. The lobes of your physical complex brain are alike in their use of weak electrical energy. The entity ruled by intuition and impulse is equal to the entity governed by rational analysis when polarity is considered. The lobes may both be used for service to self or service to others. It may seem that the rational or analytical mind might have more of a possibility of successfully pursuing the negative orientation due to the fact that, in our understanding, too much order is by its essence negative. However, this same ability to structure abstract concepts and to analyze experiential data may be the key to rapid positive polarization. It may be said that those whose analytical capacities are predominant have somewhat more to work with in polarizing.
The function of intuition is to inform intelligence. In your illusion the unbridled predominance of intuition will tend to keep an entity from the greater polarizations due to the vagaries of intuitive perception. As you may see, these two types of brain structure need to be balanced in order that the net sum of experiential catalyst will be polarization and illumination, for without the acceptance by the rational mind of the worth of the intuitive faculty the creative aspects which aid in illumination will be stifled.
There is one correspondence between right and left and positive and negative. The web of energy which surrounds your bodies contains somewhat complex polarizations. The left area of the head and upper shoulder is most generally seen to be of a negative polarization whereas the right is of positive polarization, magnetically speaking. This is the cause of the tone’s meaning for you.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 04-07-2021
Thank you Patrick, that hit the nail on the, (proverbial), head. Is that not what I have been saying? In order for Humanity to evolve, it must train itself to learn a Higher State of Consciousness. Enlightenment does not come through Intellectualism. When you are used to switching-on, (and switching-off), Intuitive Mind at Will, it leads to the Higher State of Consciousness naturally. Going back to the theme of this Thread. Science could, (literally), prove the "Law of One", if it learned to stop its Intellectual thinking. In fact, the "Law of One" does not need proof. When you are in the Higher State, you are already a part of it, (not that you are not already). Its that "Spark" that I mentioned in other "Threads". That was why I started the other Thread, although I think most people missed the point? Perhaps their time is not right?
When is the time? The "Spark" of needing to know. There is a saying in Buddhism, when the student is ready, the Master appears. It is the same with Intuitive Mind and Knowledge. When somebody is ready to learn anything, it will come naturally, (when we are ready to receive it). It is pointless searching for a Master, because we will never find him. I have learned from experience, that though a "Series of Events", there is a natural flow and things happen naturally, (in their time). It is true, patience is a virtue. Knowledge only comes by waiting.
Chaos and Fate are my two best friends. Meanwhile, we must be practical and also prepare ourselves for when the Master arrives.
I shall also wait patiently for when the time is right.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 04-09-2021
Another great discussion here. It is a debate with Bernardo Kastrup and panpsychist philosopher Philip Goff during the 'How the Light Gets In' philosophy festival, 2020.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCKoL92EL4c
Discussing stuff like the difference between all matter being conscious and only being conscious from a certain gradient of evolution.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 04-09-2021
(04-07-2021, 06:02 PM)Ming the Merciful Wrote: ...Going back to the theme of this Thread. Science could, (literally), prove the "Law of One", if it learned to stop its Intellectual thinking. In fact, the "Law of One" does not need proof. When you are in the Higher State, you are already a part of it, (not that you are not already). Its that "Spark" that I mentioned in other "Threads". That was why I started the other Thread, although I think most people missed the point? Perhaps their time is not right?...
I think what blows my mind in this thread is that there seems to be a way to arrive at the Law of One even from a purely intellectual thinking point of view.
I guess all roads leads to the Truth somehow... maybe this should have been obvious to me.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 04-09-2021
(04-09-2021, 03:00 PM)Patrick Wrote:(04-07-2021, 06:02 PM)Ming the Merciful Wrote: ...Going back to the theme of this Thread. Science could, (literally), prove the "Law of One", if it learned to stop its Intellectual thinking. In fact, the "Law of One" does not need proof. When you are in the Higher State, you are already a part of it, (not that you are not already). Its that "Spark" that I mentioned in other "Threads". That was why I started the other Thread, although I think most people missed the point? Perhaps their time is not right?...
I think what blows my mind in this thread is that there seems to be a way to arrive at the Law of One even from a purely intellectual thinking point of view.
I guess all roads leads to the Truth somehow... maybe this should have been obvious to me.
Lose you Intellectualism Patrick, (my friend). If you want the "Key to Knowledge", we all know the answer. Once you have discovered Intuitive Knowledge, Intellectual Comprehension takes second place in the perspective of how we have a worldview. It is so simple? Not only will you gain Knowledge by viewing from the "Other Side of Being", your understanding is comprehended differently. Most of the questions you are asking will disappear. I am absolutely serious. Your Conscious State is coming from the "Higher Self". Only with practice do you begin to understand. I have offered you the "Key", are you willing to accept it? I am not here to convert, because what you believe is unimportant. The "True Spiritual Knowledge" is a State without Religious Concept or Philosophy. It is true, I claim to be a follower of Zen, (except), I use that more as a guideline and not an Absolute. Even Zen must be destroyed to comprehend Zen. If you want to understand the "Law of One", simply ask in Intuitive Mind. It will give you all the answers. Anyhow my friend, the ball is in your court. I wait for your reply?
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 04-09-2021
Oh I don't need any of what I am referencing to in this thread for myself. My personal understanding of the Law of One is beyond my clumsy words indeed and certainly beyond my intellect.
No, it's for my other-selves sake that I am fascinated by that stuff. I see this as a gateway for the general population to take notice of the existence of the Law of One from within the maelstrom of everyday living. Many people have an aberration for the spiritual and so it's a good thing that the Law of One can by glimpsed from just pure logic and even empirical observations. This opens the door for many other-selves to get interested in it. Then this will slowly bring them to the spiritual side of things in good time.
EDIT: In other words. I thought finding the Law of One required an entity to first make the choice of exploring spirituality. But here we can see that an empiric road from pure intellect leads to finding it. It's just an introduction and for a seeker to learn more they'll have to go beyond pure intellect. But still, this can very well be the salvation of this world.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ymarsakar - 04-10-2021
Patrick, this would be stories where civilizations reached the Divine through science or reached science through the Divine. Earth likely has both happening at once.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 04-10-2021
(04-09-2021, 06:14 PM)Patrick Wrote: Oh I don't need any of what I am referencing to in this thread for myself. My personal understanding of the Law of One is beyond my clumsy words indeed and certainly beyond my intellect.
No, it's for my other-selves sake that I am fascinated by that stuff. I see this as a gateway for the general population to take notice of the existence of the Law of One from within the maelstrom of everyday living. Many people have an aberration for the spiritual and so it's a good thing that the Law of One can by glimpsed from just pure logic and even empirical observations. This opens the door for many other-selves to get interested in it. Then this will slowly bring them to the spiritual side of things in good time.
EDIT: In other words. I thought finding the Law of One required an entity to first make the choice of exploring spirituality. But here we can see that an empiric road from pure intellect leads to finding it. It's just an introduction and for a seeker to learn more they'll have to go beyond pure intellect. But still, this can very well be the salvation of this world.
More importantly, find the Spirituality within. I agree that Intellectual Knowledge is good for exploring the higher values, (but), there will become a point where there would have to be a Transcendental Shift in the general thinking of the Populace and a Quantum Leap in how the values are interpreted. I am always preaching embracing Intuitive Mind? Yet, will it not one day become the "Norm" and not the abstract. To the Intellect, Intuitive Mind is an Abstract Value. Or, something that is not easily accessed because Intellectual Mind always wants to be in control. To the majority of people, they are unaware they have Intuitive Mind, and have never thought that there is a "Higher Self". In the process of bringing-in the Quantum Shift, people will have to learn the "New Values". If they don't, nothing will happen on a World Scale.
If it cannot be started here, where would it start? There is a general "Awakening" appearing throughout Humanity, and people are looking for guidance. Except, if they cannot find somewhere to understand how to reach the Higher Self. Then what? Remaining where we are? I am ready to evolve, and it is something I am looking forward to. Earth is too bogged-down in materialistic attachments and are too slow evolving through lack of Knowledge and Understanding.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 04-10-2021
Yes ultimately, reconnecting with the Intuitive Mind is what is needed. We are getting there. It's really interesting to witness.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 04-10-2021
(04-10-2021, 01:38 PM)Patrick Wrote: Yes ultimately, reconnecting with the Intuitive Mind is what is needed. We are getting there. It's really interesting to witness.
Too slow for my liking. Then I had an opportunity that the majority of people do not have, and I can see the advantages once you know the "Inner Reality". In my delusion of non-emotional attachment, it is an emotional issue because it is not happening fast enough. The Student has become the Master and he grows impatient. Perhaps I should go unto the wilderness and open a "Temple of the Divine", (metaphorically), and demand action from the God(s)? On the other hand, according to Zen the God(s) do not exist in the Western pretext. I should had been a poet, I am too colourful with my words? Even Shakespeare would mourn in discontent to read my soliloquys.
A change of subject, (momentarily). The death of Prince Philip? Will Karma give what Karma is due? I have a suspicion that he will be born in his next incarnation as an Untouchable in India. It could be his fate. Karma and Fate have ways of playing with people. I do not have anything against the Monarchy, (per se), although it is a part of the Old World Order, and soon it will be their time to fall. When the New World Order appears, (not as envisioned by soothsayers), of totalitarian overlords, and the rich overpowering the poor. What nobody is talking about, is when the New World Order appears, in the form of the evolution of Humanity to the "Fourth Protocol", (as I like to call it). The Old World Order will also have to be removed because the System is part of the problem and holding people back. They are not in the Evolutionary Process. Be part of the Evolution, or be damned. The God(s) of Chaos and Fate are not easy God(s) to live with. They have strict rules that must be obeyed. The God of Karma is a jealous God and he pays wisely what is due. Make one mistake, and your fate is sealed for another fifty lifetimes. Walk gently on the hot coals or they may cause agony. So ends the second soliloquy.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Patrick - 04-10-2021
Not fast enough! Yeah I know what that feels like.
After 2012, I had to come to terms that slooooow would win the day unfortunately. Well, it's slow for us, but really I think it is all happening really fast from a 75000 years' point of view...
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ming the Merciful - 04-10-2021
(04-10-2021, 04:25 PM)Patrick Wrote: Not fast enough! Yeah I know what that feels like.
After 2012, I had to come to terms that slooooow would win the day unfortunately. Well, it's slow for us, but really I think it is all happening really fast from a 75000 years' point of
view...
Patrick, you should learn to write in soliloquys? It is an honour to Shakespeare? Is it not? Don't mind me, I have a wild imagination and there is nothing I enjoy than playing with words. I had not thought of it like that, the timeline. Our concept of time is limited and we can only grasp a moment in the infinity of eons. What is a lifetime of eighty years, compared a myriad of eons? Or, a Manvantara in Hindu terminology. Another word that is unknown in the West. I think it the rotation and the cycle of the Galaxy.
Correction: 720,000 years. I recommend you have a look on "Wikipedia".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manvantara#:~:text=A%20manvantara%2C%20in%20Hindu%20cosmology,Manu)%20are%20created%20and%20perish.
Another series I recommend in YouTube is a Channel named "Boaz Mysteries". It is the latest discoveries regarding Hindu Mythology and the Scientific connections, and how, (naturally), it was misinterpreted in the West, (isn't everything). How unusual, this is not a soliloquy, only the words of a common man.
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - jafar - 04-12-2021
Mr Sadhguru has rebranded "Yoga" as science named "Yogic Science".
And it's 'practices' as 'applicable technology'.
Yoga by itself literally means "Unite", although the term has been mis-interpreted as merely "fitness and health practices", which is not 100% incorrect either.
The approach is to teach others the 'technology' on how to experience the "non physical aspects" that cannot be easily sensed by the 5 physical senses. Once they experienced it then surely they will believe it as part of their reality, as experiencing is believing.
A simple example: once you experienced meeting your own higher self, you will definitely believe the conception of 'higher self' as part of your reality. The believe will be so strong that you do not need any assurance from others, including those who labeled themselves as 'scientist'.
This is actually a better approach compared to today's 'scientific experiment' as not all type of experiment (ie: Quantum particle experiment) can be easily performed by common folks thus witnessing the results themselves. What they do is they merely believe the results of the experiments as experienced and interpreted by others.
How Yogis Know the Secrets of the Universe
https://youtu.be/Relgq7Twbfw
RE: Empirical scientific evidence of the Law of One - Ymarsakar - 04-12-2021
The way I have seen my clients practice Western yoga, is completely backwards. They don't know the proper breathing patterns. They instead use physical muscle tension to hold themselves in positions, as if they are stretching.
This in turns causes enormous stress/resistance build up in their meridian chakra chi prana channels, which is the opposite of the type of blockage breakthrough used in breath work clearing, as a preliminary work for unification with the divine higher self.
They are essentially covering their bodies with more tense muscles and creating higher barriers to the intuitive energy connection.