(08-18-2012, 12:50 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: Confused, did you used to have faster internet before it became too slow for you to watch videos? I remember you saying it was too slow, and you used to post a lot of videos.

(08-19-2012, 12:47 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: That was a beautiful video Confused. What does it have to do with the veil I wonder?

(08-20-2012, 07:08 AM)Meerie Wrote: Were the Mayans then maya, too?
just an illusion?

Quote:Aslan: If the Witch knew the true meaning of sacrifice, she might have interpreted the deep magic differently. That when a willing victim who has committed no treachery, is killed in a traitor's stead, the stone table will crack, and even death itself would turn backwards.

Source: From the movie, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (2005); http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0363771/quotes

Quote:Abuse in families is an extremely complex problem with multiple causes. Recent research in this area shows that there are certain variables, which add to the likelihood of violence. Researchers are looking at the family system, personal histories, interpersonal skills and biochemistry to try to tease out the factors that contribute to aggression in families. At present, research has determined the attributes of violent men. Not much research has been conducted on women's violent behavior. I use the pronoun "he" in this article as most abusers are men. Men commit 95% of the violence, assault, rape and murder. Of course, in a broader sense, violence is a society issue as we all contribute to it when we do not stand up and say that it is wrong.

(08-23-2012, 01:54 PM)Confused Wrote: What is polarized light? -- Polarization is the aligning of vibrations in a transverse wave, usually by filtering out waves of other directions. Polarized light waves only travel vertically or horizontally -- when combined at right angles they block each other out and no net light can be detected.

Source: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_polarized_light

(08-23-2012, 04:58 PM)Ruth Wrote:

(08-23-2012, 01:54 PM)Confused Wrote: What is polarized light? -- Polarization is the aligning of vibrations in a transverse wave, usually by filtering out waves of other directions. Polarized light waves only travel vertically or horizontally -- when combined at right angles they block each other out and no net light can be detected.

Source: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_polarized_light

I know it isn't the same thing, but this reminded me of a demonstration I saw at a seminar produced by Kodak back in my film camera days. The instructor was illustrating the additive properties of light. With pigments, white is the absence of color.

Subtractive color: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtractive_color


But with light, white is the PRESENCE of color.

Additive color. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_color

Interesting to study the way light works to allow us to see colors.

(08-23-2012, 05:51 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: It's interesting how we can only see a small portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. I think it's like one inch compared to a football field or more.

Quote:A fleeting pulse of light has been captured and then made to reappear in a different location by US physicists.

(08-23-2012, 05:51 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: It's interesting how we can only see a small portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. I think it's like one inch compared to a football field or more.

Quote:A pair of gamma-ray photons – one possessed of a million times the energy of the other – arrived at virtually the same instant at NASA's orbiting Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, where the Large Area Telescope, for which Stanford's Peter Michelson is principal investigator, detected them after a 7.3 billion year race across the universe. Some proponents of alternatives to Einstein's theory of gravity would have predicted that the more energetic would have interacted with more matter along the way and thus been much farther behind the less energetic one. They were wrong – Einstein wins this round.

(08-24-2012, 02:54 PM)Confused Wrote: Fermi Telescope Caps First Year With Glimpse of Space-Time

(08-25-2012, 06:04 AM)Confused Wrote: From the attached webpage

Quote:A pair of gamma-ray photons – one possessed of a million times the energy of the other – arrived at virtually the same instant at NASA's orbiting Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, where the Large Area Telescope, for which Stanford's Peter Michelson is principal investigator, detected them after a 7.3 billion year race across the universe. Some proponents of alternatives to Einstein's theory of gravity would have predicted that the more energetic would have interacted with more matter along the way and thus been much farther behind the less energetic one. They were wrong – Einstein wins this round.

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/october26/fermi-telescope-discovery-102809.html

(08-24-2012, 08:56 AM)Patrick Wrote:

(08-23-2012, 05:51 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: It's interesting how we can only see a small portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. I think it's like one inch compared to a football field or more.

Imagine that my friend, this small portion of the spectrum that we can sense includes what any of our technological instruments can sense, not only what our own biological eyes can see.

By small portion of the spectrum I mean, from radio waves to very high energy gamma rays.

4d is sitting within a portion very far ahead of the most energetic gamma rays that we can detect. Like Ra said there are no 3d instruments that can detect 4d and up.

(08-25-2012, 11:00 AM)Ruth Wrote: We know so much, yet so little.

Quote:16.39 Questioner: I am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the Law of One to go from the third to the fourth density. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. It is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable. Understanding is not of this density.

(08-25-2012, 11:14 AM)Cyan Wrote: ...microsingularities in the free.

(08-25-2012, 01:23 PM)Cyan Wrote: Edit: Come to think of it....

It does seem literally impossible with 3d equipment to monitor 4d directly because there would be no measurement and nothing to record and no way to return or to move forward or backward.

(08-26-2012, 05:22 AM)Cyan Wrote: More like trying to capture C-Span on a potato in 65 million BC

(08-26-2012, 05:37 AM)Confused Wrote:

(08-26-2012, 05:22 AM)Cyan Wrote: More like trying to capture C-Span on a potato in 65 million BC

Ha ha ha! Very true Thanks, Cyan. I get it more clearly now.

Let me see whether I can find more material on the subject of black holes. They have interested me ever since the LOO happened in my life.

I guess black holes are the assimilation and absorption of experiences for the creator, and the white hole is the emission of intelligence into the plenum of space and time for setting up of a 'new' logos, from the experiences gathered. In that sense, the big bang may be a white hole, coming through the closing window of a previous black hole. Just a thought. Creator and creation is too vast, infinite, mysterious for simple logical deductions to unlock the mysteries of the limitless being.

---

Black hole could be connected to a white hole? An astrophysicisist answers here -- http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/011027a.html

Quote:Energy makes up matter, electrons are a form of matter, so electrons are made up of energy, which means photons. Light being comprised of streams of individual particles then forces electrons to inhabit only specific energy levels when in orbit around the nucleus of an atom. When an electron gives up or receives energy, it is doing so in the form of giving up or receiving photons of light (of which it is comprised). Since photons are seen to come in discrete packets and not continuous streams of energy, then an electron is limited to exchanging energy solely in multiples of these minimal packets of energy; no fractional amounts of a single photon are allowed. When in orbit around the nucleus of an atom, then, if an electron is to move closer to or farther away from the nucleus (i.e., raise or lower its energy), it can do so only in multiples of a photon’s energy. This translates into there being very specific energy levels that an electron can obtain in orbit around the nucleus. It’s like the steps on a ladder: You can’t climb up half a step. The steps would be the energy levels and the spacing between the steps determined by the size of a photon.