Bring4th
[Ra]: I am personally called ... - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Strictly Law of One Material (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: [Ra]: I am personally called ... (/showthread.php?tid=10369)

Pages: 1 2


[Ra]: I am personally called ... - Plenum - 02-10-2015

I have always wondered a bit about this passage:

Quote:7.6 Questioner: About how many entities at present are calling from planet Earth for your services?

Ra: I am called personally by three hundred fifty-two thousand [352,000].

now, in 1981, I doubt there would have been 352 000 people who knew the name of Ra.  So how were they being called?

I heard in an interpretation by Scott Mandelker, that this number would correspond to the number of adept level seekers, or those who are operating with an indigo level kundalini.  Adept level seekers are seeking at the level of unity, which corresponds to the type of seeking that Ra is doing, albeit, at a different density.

that said, the rest of the answer from the above passage goes:

Quote:The Confederation, in its entire spectrum of entity-complexes, is called by six hundred thirty-two millions [632,000,000] of your mind/body/spirit complexes. These numbers have been simplified.

The population in 1981 was 4.5 billion souls, so the Confederation was being called by about 14.5% of the population.

What could those numbers correspond to?  The number of heart-level seekers?  14.5% would be a reasonable number for the Harvest percentage of this planet as well.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Ashim - 02-10-2015

(02-10-2015, 01:48 AM)Bring4th_Plenum Wrote: I have always wondered a bit about this passage:


Quote:7.6 Questioner: About how many entities at present are calling from planet Earth for your services?

Ra: I am called personally by three hundred fifty-two thousand [352,000].

now, in 1981, I doubt there would have been 352 000 people who knew the name of Ra.  So how were they being called?

I heard in an interpretation by Scott Mandelker, that this number would correspond to the number of adept level seekers, or those who are operating with an indigo level kundalini.  Adept level seekers are seeking at the level of unity, which corresponds to the type of seeking that Ra is doing, albeit, at a different density.

that said, the rest of the answer from the above passage goes:


Quote:The Confederation, in its entire spectrum of entity-complexes, is called by six hundred thirty-two millions [632,000,000] of your mind/body/spirit complexes. These numbers have been simplified.

The population in 1981 was 4.5 billion souls, so the Confederation was being called by about 14.5% of the population.

What could those numbers correspond to?  The number of heart-level seekers?  14.5% would be a reasonable number for the Harvest percentage of this planet as well.

Yeh, have also wondered about this. My impression is that we have to look carefully at the wordage.
"..calling from planet earth.."

Ra would seem to include all planetary entities, not just surface dwellers, and not only those in physical incarnation.
So the "population" figure should be much higher, the percentage of callers much lower.

I would include these too :

Quote:There are bases, as you would call them, undersea in your southern waters near the Bahamas as well as in your Pacific seas in various places close to your Chilean borders on the water. ................. There are bases which move about your lands. There are bases, if you would call them that, in your skies. These are the bases of your peoples, very numerous and, as we have said, potentially destructive.

Surely these inhabitants count towards the population together with those in time/space experience awaiting Harvest.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - anagogy - 02-10-2015

Yeah, I'm betting a lot of those beings personally calling Ra are occupants of time/space Earth.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Plenum - 02-10-2015

I hadn't considered that angle.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - βαθμιαίος - 02-10-2015

What about wanderers? If there were 65 million in 1981 and many were from Ra, then the 352,000 could mostly be from Ra themselves (assuming wanderers count as "from planet earth").


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Bluebell - 02-10-2015

i just call aliens in general


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Plenum - 02-10-2015

(02-10-2015, 10:46 AM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: What about wanderers?  If there were 65 million in 1981 and many were from Ra, then the 352,000 could mostly be from Ra themselves (assuming wanderers count as "from planet earth").

I had the feeling out of that 65 million, that it was a very sizable proportion that those of Ra contributed. Maybe even upwards of a third? I'm not sure if there are quotes to back me on that.

And that has to be balanced with the fact that the Venus population was very small to begin with, so the number of entities in 6d Ra might not even encompass 20 million.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Plenum - 02-10-2015

(02-10-2015, 11:13 AM)Bluebell Wrote: i just call aliens in general

lol.

Do they ever answer back?   Tongue


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Bluebell - 02-10-2015

(02-10-2015, 11:26 AM)Bring4th_Plenum Wrote:
(02-10-2015, 11:13 AM)Bluebell Wrote: i just call aliens in general

lol.

Do they ever answer back?   Tongue

Blush no...


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - jody - 02-10-2015

Ra has left many structures on our planet. There are many mysteries in this world that are divine in nature. eg; pyramids, stonehenge... perhaps people call to the Creator of these monuments, unaware that Ra had created them for us? It would still be personal calling of Ra.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Minyatur - 02-10-2015

I called Ra two days ago by accident, I started reading a transcript of session 74 and his greeting sentence simply echoed in my mind.

What's weird when you're conciously channelling, is that it's hard to distinguish if you're inducing the thoughts or not. I've read somewhere that people often channel without being aware of it.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - tamaryn - 02-10-2015

Yes, i would agree it is the number of entities walking now from the heart level and calling upon their respective higher selves or guides for assistance.

Possibly entities from time/space appearing very close to harvestability? Maybe I'm wrong about this part and it is simple entities calling or in need of guidance?


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Monica - 02-10-2015

Ra was called by vibration, not by name.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Fastidious Emanations - 02-11-2015

44.6 Questioner: Is there a reason that I am open to these signals of a negative nature?
Ra: I am Ra. Are you not all things?


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Ashim - 02-11-2015

(02-10-2015, 08:08 PM)Monica Wrote: Ra was called by vibration, not by name.

Please explain.
Ra talks about "vibratory sound complexes".
How to these differ from your "vibration"?


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Bluebell - 02-11-2015

a vibratory sound complex: Joe Schmoe

vibration: Joe's unique energy signature


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - AnthroHeart - 02-11-2015

I called out to Ra many times but got the distinct impression they wanted me to stop seeking them.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Ashim - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 06:22 PM)Bluebell Wrote: a vibratory sound complex: Joe Schmoe

vibration: Joe's unique energy signature

Do not know the signature.
I know the name though.
Sings "Joe Schmoe" in gregorian scale.
Connects with entity sound vibration complex "Joe Schmoe".

How would one know the signature, like here in 3d?
Would it not be more likely to know the "vibratory sound complex"?


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Ashim - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 06:32 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I called out to Ra many times but got the distinct impression they wanted me to stop seeking them.

Why do you think that was?


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - AnthroHeart - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 06:35 PM)Ashim Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:32 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I called out to Ra many times but got the distinct impression they wanted me to stop seeking them.

Why do you think that was?

I was going through Schizophrenic episodes then, I think that was the reason.

Perhaps I should try again because I liked their energy. They helped me solve a complex set of energetic puzzles once that involved the Law of Octaves.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Bluebell - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 06:34 PM)Ashim Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:22 PM)Bluebell Wrote: a vibratory sound complex: Joe Schmoe

vibration: Joe's unique energy signature

Do not know the signature.
I know the name though.
Sings "Joe Schmoe" in gregorian scale.
Connects with entity sound vibration complex "Joe Schmoe".

How would one know the signature, like here in 3d?
Would it not be more likely to know the "vibratory sound complex"?

lol

a name is kind of transient... :-/ & a less reliable address.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Bluebell - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 06:37 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:35 PM)Ashim Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:32 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I called out to Ra many times but got the distinct impression they wanted me to stop seeking them.

Why do you think that was?

I was going through Schizophrenic episodes then, I think that was the reason.

Perhaps I should try again because I liked their energy. They helped me solve a complex set of energetic puzzles once that involved the Law of Octaves.

ru sure it's not going to trigger another episode?


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - AnthroHeart - 02-11-2015

I had a lot of fun during those episodes except for the scary stuff. But I'm on meds now that keep my 3rd eye closed.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Ashim - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 06:42 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I had a lot of fun during those episodes except for the scary stuff. But I'm on meds now that keep my 3rd eye closed.

Are you a wanderer of Ra?


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - AnthroHeart - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 06:49 PM)Ashim Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:42 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I had a lot of fun during those episodes except for the scary stuff. But I'm on meds now that keep my 3rd eye closed.

Are you a wanderer of Ra?

I don't know. I really hope so.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Ashim - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 06:50 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:49 PM)Ashim Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:42 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I had a lot of fun during those episodes except for the scary stuff. But I'm on meds now that keep my 3rd eye closed.

Are you a wanderer of Ra?

I don't know. I really hope so.

I don't think so.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - AnthroHeart - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 06:51 PM)Ashim Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:50 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:49 PM)Ashim Wrote:
(02-11-2015, 06:42 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I had a lot of fun during those episodes except for the scary stuff. But I'm on meds now that keep my 3rd eye closed.

Are you a wanderer of Ra?

I don't know. I really hope so.

I don't think so.

That's cool too. I've resonated more with 5D than 6D.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Bluebell - 02-11-2015

sometimes i think i'm 5D too. then again sometimes i think i'm 0D...


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - Minyatur - 02-11-2015

(02-11-2015, 07:04 PM)Bluebell Wrote: sometimes i think i'm 5D too. then again sometimes i think i'm 0D...

0D is the best dimension, infinite endless void.


RE: [Ra]: I am personally called ... - AnthroHeart - 02-11-2015

Sometimes I think I wandered straight from the Logos.