Bring4th
Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? (/showthread.php?tid=11318)



Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - third-density-being - 06-26-2015

Hello Dear Other-Selves,
 
I just had an intriguing Thought.
 
In case of (for example) 4th-density Race, which on everyday basis uses telepathy, would It be possible for Beings to recognize from Whom each “telepathic communication” came from/originated, only by the “properties of the telepathic communications”? Like We are able to recognize for example voices of Our Family or Friends and Colleagues? Would “telepathic communication” possess same or even more “characteristics” of each Being?
 
All I have Best in me for You


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Minyatur - 06-26-2015

I'd say entities would be able to recognize the energy/vibe they associate with a particular other-self. No basis for it, just my thoughts.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - outerheaven - 06-26-2015

In my opinion, based on absolutely nothing but my intuition Wink, the use of telepathy is preceded by the understanding (not intellectual belief) that we are all one entity. Thus the origination of a thought isn't seen as coming from "somebody/somewhere" else; rather it is coming from a part of your own self, such as stubbing your toe and receiving the "communication" that it is pained. That being said, you would know quite well where exactly the message came from.

I don't really think we can have telepathic thought with the lifestyle, beliefs, etc. we have today. It would require a paradigm shift, IMO, making it hard for us to ponder the mechanics of it under our current perspective.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Aion - 06-26-2015

Uh, yeah, that's how it works.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - anagogy - 06-26-2015

(06-26-2015, 04:08 PM)outerheaven Wrote: In my opinion, based on absolutely nothing but my intuition Wink, the use of telepathy is preceded by the understanding (not intellectual belief) that we are all one entity. Thus the origination of a thought isn't seen as coming from "somebody/somewhere" else; rather it is coming from a part of your own self, such as stubbing your toe and receiving the "communication" that it is pained. That being said, you would know quite well where exactly the message came from.

I absolutely agree with you, except for that last part.

In every experience I've had with telepathy, I was confused as to whether they were my own thoughts or someone else's.  It seems really hard to tell.  But perhaps I just suck at it.  /shrug

I'm sure at a more finessed level, one would know exactly where it hailed from.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Bourbon Betty - 06-26-2015

Do smells have a specific thought?

Good thought smell.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - third-density-being - 06-26-2015

So, if for an example firstly would Ra communicated telepathically with me and would maintain such communication for (for example) a month of everyday “telepathic chat” – and than after a week or so Seth would begin to communicate with me in same fashion for a month. Would I be able to tell after that from whom next “communication” would originated only by the “characteristics of the telepathic communication”?

Or maybe such ability to distinct/recognize is available only for Beings for whom telepathy is as natural ability, as for as clapping with hands?


All I have Best in me for You


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Aion - 06-27-2015

For me it's like music. Everyone plays a different song.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Splash - 06-27-2015

(06-26-2015, 03:50 PM)third-density-being Wrote: Hello Dear Other-Selves,
 
I just had an intriguing Thought.
 
In case of (for example) 4th-density Race, which on everyday basis uses telepathy, would It be possible for Beings to recognize from Whom each “telepathic communication” came from/originated, only by the “properties of the telepathic communications”? Like We are able to recognize for example voices of Our Family or Friends and Colleagues? Would “telepathic communication” possess same or even more “characteristics” of each Being?
 
All I have Best in me for You


I don't know for 4D. But for 3D - for me- my answers are:
Yes.
Yes.
Less, or the same or even more.


Sheldon: Ah, the talking cure. Classical Freudian, good choice. If it will help speed things along, uh, my answers to the standard Rorschach ink blot test are A, a bat, B, a bat, C, a bat, and D, my father killing my mother with a hypodermic needle.



RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Bluebell - 06-27-2015

(06-26-2015, 04:32 PM)anagogy Wrote:
(06-26-2015, 04:08 PM)outerheaven Wrote: In my opinion, based on absolutely nothing but my intuition Wink, the use of telepathy is preceded by the understanding (not intellectual belief) that we are all one entity. Thus the origination of a thought isn't seen as coming from "somebody/somewhere" else; rather it is coming from a part of your own self, such as stubbing your toe and receiving the "communication" that it is pained. That being said, you would know quite well where exactly the message came from.

I absolutely agree with you, except for that last part.

In every experience I've had with telepathy, I was confused as to whether they were my own thoughts or someone else's.  It seems really hard to tell.  But perhaps I just suck at it.  /shrug

I'm sure at a more finessed level, one would know exactly where it hailed from.

u clearly suck at it. don't forget it's different in 3D. Tongue like an empath in 3D might not distinguish between own emotion and another's. i'm pretty sure it's clearer in mid to late 4D at least...


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Bluebell - 06-27-2015

(06-26-2015, 04:38 PM)Bourbon Betty Wrote: Do smells have a specific thought?

Good thought smell.

everything has a unique vibration. smell, sound, color and touch all vibrate.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Minyatur - 06-27-2015

(06-26-2015, 04:32 PM)anagogy Wrote:
(06-26-2015, 04:08 PM)outerheaven Wrote: In my opinion, based on absolutely nothing but my intuition Wink, the use of telepathy is preceded by the understanding (not intellectual belief) that we are all one entity. Thus the origination of a thought isn't seen as coming from "somebody/somewhere" else; rather it is coming from a part of your own self, such as stubbing your toe and receiving the "communication" that it is pained. That being said, you would know quite well where exactly the message came from.

I absolutely agree with you, except for that last part.

In every experience I've had with telepathy, I was confused as to whether they were my own thoughts or someone else's.  It seems really hard to tell.  But perhaps I just suck at it.  /shrug

I'm sure at a more finessed level, one would know exactly where it hailed from.

Hard to know if you would be speaking with a thought form or an actual entity, struggling with this as well.

But then you could say an actual entity is also pretty much a thought form which we project. So in the end, it could be said that we can only talk with ourselves.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - VanAlioSaldo - 06-27-2015

(06-26-2015, 03:50 PM)third-density-being Wrote: Hello Dear Other-Selves,
 
I just had an intriguing Thought.
 
In case of (for example) 4th-density Race, which on everyday basis uses telepathy, would It be possible for Beings to recognize from Whom each “telepathic communication” came from/originated, only by the “properties of the telepathic communications”? Like We are able to recognize for example voices of Our Family or Friends and Colleagues? Would “telepathic communication” possess same or even more “characteristics” of each Being?
 
All I have Best in me for You

Imagine me talking to you.

Imagine this being done telepathically.

Can you tell it's me when I talk to you?

Can you tell it's me when I communicate with you?

Communication is personal.  You have this, text.  Then you've got the vibratory sound complexes.  Then there's the process of Telepathy which can communicate everything from Concept, Sound, Intuition, Thought, Creative Thought, Complex Emotion, general Emotions, Feelings...

DnD alone depicts various forms of telepathy.  Everyone is also right here right now slowly growing more telepathic as the human body evolves with Earth.  If you ever randomly intuitively know something about someone without any reason at all, THAT WAS TELEPATHY.   If you ever pick up on someones mood without them showing it to you (they couldn't hide their feelings from you) that was probably telepathy in a way.

Telepathy is simply the exchange of information between two beings directly.  Information comes in ALL FORMS, experience and identity.  This is the Holographic Reality, underneath it there is no separation.

Telepathy also does allow for private thought and privacy.  You can keep your thoughts to yourself or only communicate with one being in a group telepathically.

Telepathy is so amazing.  I wish I was a full telepath.

(06-26-2015, 04:08 PM)outerheaven Wrote: In my opinion, based on absolutely nothing but my intuition Wink, the use of telepathy is preceded by the understanding (not intellectual belief) that we are all one entity. Thus the origination of a thought isn't seen as coming from "somebody/somewhere" else; rather it is coming from a part of your own self, such as stubbing your toe and receiving the "communication" that it is pained. That being said, you would know quite well where exactly the message came from.

I don't really think we can have telepathic thought with the lifestyle, beliefs, etc. we have today. It would require a paradigm shift, IMO, making it hard for us to ponder the mechanics of it under our current perspective.

We're in a Paradigm shift now.  Your manner of explanation is perfect.  All is one, communication is typically understood regarding its origin UNLESS THE SENDER IS HIDING THEMSELVES (as per the Law of Confusion as an example, but they can do this once they learn how to)

Have you heard of the joke about the man who hurt everywhere he touched?  He walks into the doctor thinking he has several injuries across his body.  Doc checks him out and see's nothing wrong, thinks its mental until the man winces in pain as he rubbed his eye.  Well turned out, his finger was broken.

Odd how sometimes we can't tell.

(06-26-2015, 04:32 PM)anagogy Wrote:
(06-26-2015, 04:08 PM)outerheaven Wrote: In my opinion, based on absolutely nothing but my intuition Wink, the use of telepathy is preceded by the understanding (not intellectual belief) that we are all one entity. Thus the origination of a thought isn't seen as coming from "somebody/somewhere" else; rather it is coming from a part of your own self, such as stubbing your toe and receiving the "communication" that it is pained. That being said, you would know quite well where exactly the message came from.

I absolutely agree with you, except for that last part.

In every experience I've had with telepathy, I was confused as to whether they were my own thoughts or someone else's.  It seems really hard to tell.  But perhaps I just suck at it.  /shrug

I'm sure at a more finessed level, one would know exactly where it hailed from.

You don't suck at it.  You might just be new to it.  Telepathy is learned, even to younger souls according to Journey of Souls.  You start off a bit outspoken on accident, either one or all. You learn to direct it, you learn to control its properties.  You can learn to hide yourself behind your communication, you can even project communication without providing origin details, you might even, if you're advanced enough, be able to mimic others or devise extremely intricate methods of telepathic properties.  Just intuition there, I have nothing to provide as example other than this thought.  Is telepathy it's own thing, or just a tool we use?  At unity, is telepathy even necessary with the many who make up the self?

(06-26-2015, 04:38 PM)Bourbon Betty Wrote: Do smells have a specific thought?

Good thought smell.

Do tastes have a specific thought?

Do sounds, feelings, seen things, have a specific thought?

Heart

(06-26-2015, 09:26 PM)third-density-being Wrote: So, if for an example firstly would Ra communicated telepathically with me and would maintain such communication for (for example) a month of everyday “telepathic chat” – and than after a week or so Seth would begin to communicate with me in same fashion for a month. Would I be able to tell after that from whom next “communication” would originated only by the “characteristics of the telepathic communication”?

Or maybe such ability to distinct/recognize is available only for Beings for whom telepathy is as natural ability, as for as clapping with hands?


All I have Best in me for You

I imagine so.  It depends.  How open and intuitive are you?  If you block out extrasensory communications you may not understand what you're receiving at all.  If you're open but the source wants its self not known and you're not advanced with telepathy, you might not know in belief that you aren't comprehending, when they're just hiding.

Telepathy is a natural ability for every'one.  We're all Consciousness, aren't we?

(06-27-2015, 09:35 AM)Minyatur Wrote:
(06-26-2015, 04:32 PM)anagogy Wrote:
(06-26-2015, 04:08 PM)outerheaven Wrote: In my opinion, based on absolutely nothing but my intuition Wink, the use of telepathy is preceded by the understanding (not intellectual belief) that we are all one entity. Thus the origination of a thought isn't seen as coming from "somebody/somewhere" else; rather it is coming from a part of your own self, such as stubbing your toe and receiving the "communication" that it is pained. That being said, you would know quite well where exactly the message came from.

I absolutely agree with you, except for that last part.

In every experience I've had with telepathy, I was confused as to whether they were my own thoughts or someone else's.  It seems really hard to tell.  But perhaps I just suck at it.  /shrug

I'm sure at a more finessed level, one would know exactly where it hailed from.

Hard to know if you would be speaking with a thought form or an actual entity, struggling with this as well.

But then you could say an actual entity is also pretty much a thought form which we project. So in the end, it could be said that we can only talk with ourselves.

Man Min, you create some serious confusion for me sometimes haha

We are only talking to ourselves, that's not an excuse to avoid Manyness Factors though so lets untwist this issue of Thoughtforms BEING 'Actual Entities', I'm assuming by actual entities you're referring to any Density Entities, but referencing 3D+ entities?

Thoughtforms are pretty intricate and complex in themselves, some having their own 'being', as Ra remarks regarding slaughtered livestock and such, Thoughtforms can exist and are different from, as you call them 'Actual Entities'.
Both can provide telepathy.  Except 3D beings are veiled, so we also have these things happening on 'accident' or unconsciously on purpose without being aware of it.
4D+ should already have a grasp on telepathy and its many ways of operation and use.

Here we're learning about something we already have but aren't comprehending as having.  The intricate confusion that follows can be hard to discern, just try to realize that if you don't comprehend a telepathic communication, you shouldn't beat yourself up over it.

I feel like Telepathy has to do with an energy transfer between violet ray and indigo ray for human beings, if you don't have an open Indigo Ray, you won't be fully open to receive communications in a sensible way beyond getting portions of the communication.

I've personally HEARD telepathic communications in my mind during meditation before.  If you're not open, you get fragments.  Don't look too much into the fragments, just take it as a sign, if you desire further contact, retain an open energy body at least up to Green Ray, that's when the most important information makes it to you despite being blocked at the Indigo ray, part way up Green Ray but before Blue Ray is the 12 System Spiritual Family Chakra which is connected to your Guidance System and may be the way your guides communicate with you, requiring only an open heart to make it be activated.  Blue Ray allows the honesty of the content to be filtered, at Green Ray openness the Blue Ray basically auto-opens and allows honest information, and is blocked by you personally not being honest with yourself regarding the information.

Indigo Ray however needs to be open to truly comprehend and understand a telepathic communication, while you can still understand and comprehend without an opn indigo ray, it'll be a bit harder to discern the 'full available' properties of the telepathic communication (was it a guide, a greeting, a thought inserted into your mind to help you, to harm you, was it emotional information, creative information, intellectual information, personal information, and such as a few examples).

I would honestly claim to have had telepathic experiences VERY OFTEN back during my major awakening were it not for this one issue.

Back then the voices came in so clearly I had trouble discerning them from my own thoughts, but they did so through my own indigo ray being open and having my own self-belief that I'd be able to discern my own thoughts from ones that aren't my own.

Versus before then the few times it happened the voice took on a harmonic resonance like sound, as if listening to them through a sound modulator (think that one pimp in Saints Row The Third who's voice is always modulated into a song).

So I don't know if Telepathy is differentiated to us with that modulated frequency voice versus clear voices.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Minyatur - 06-27-2015

What I meant by thought forms, is that in a way I am nothing more than a thought form that you all created. So even if one communicates with me telepathically, well we'd both still be talking to ourself. This forum is that hapenning, we're exploring different perspectives and manners of talking with ourself.

So if you talk with only a thought form, it's more like a "lesser" thought form from that perspective rather than an actual entity-like thought form like we are.


RE: Does telepathic communication possess characteristics of Beings? - Aion - 06-27-2015

Difference between entity and thought-form to me. Could say 'thought entity' and 'thought form'.