Bring4th
The science of reincarnation - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Science & Technology (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: The science of reincarnation (/showthread.php?tid=12535)

The science of reincarnation - Nía - 02-19-2016

Research by Dr. Jim B. Tucker:

[Image: Reinkarnation-Kinder-Analyse1.PNG]

Research by Dr. Ian Stevenson:

-`ღ´-

RE: The science of reincarnation - Matt1 - 02-21-2016

It makes me wonder , perhaps we will one day have knowledge of such things through the use of technology and mental techniques used at a young age to find out helpful information about past life experiences. If the knowledge exists in the unconsciousness, then a technology could be developed to access that store house of knowledge, yet it wouldn't be as useful as the discipline of personality.

RE: The science of reincarnation - ada - 02-21-2016

Thank you for sharing!

RE: The science of reincarnation - eccentric1 - 03-18-2016

(02-21-2016, 11:12 AM)Matt1 Wrote: It makes me wonder , perhaps we will one day have knowledge of such things through the use of technology and mental techniques used at a young age to find out helpful information about past life experiences. If the knowledge exists in the unconsciousness, then a technology could be developed to access that store house of knowledge, yet it wouldn't be as useful as the discipline of personality.

Greetings & Salutations One & All,

A quick review of Ra's discussion of the densities can be helpful in this matter.

It is my understanding that 3D is "not for knowing" & in 4D + "everything is known." 

Since planet Earth is 4D activated currently & transitioning out of 3D, things such as listed above will become more & more commonplace as "time" progresses. Let us substitute the word "information" for "knowledge" & understand that "technology" is not necessary to obtain this information. The information can be accessed in meditative states while activating the higher chakras. The quality of your intentions will determine the quantity & usefulness of the information accessed.

Peace be with you,

  ~ Thomas

RE: The science of reincarnation - Dekalb_Blues - 05-09-2016





Battling Neo-Marilyns:
[Image: marilyn.jpg][Image: 860960163_d8b6ff783b_o.jpg]
Sherrie Lee Laird http://sherrielealairdmarilynmonroe.blogspot.com/


 [Image: Chris-Vicens-Marilyn-Monroe.jpg]
Chris Vicens http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1334549/Past-lives-Marilyn-Monroe-reincarnated-Chris-shop-assistant.html


[Image: Untitled.jpg]
Dr. Adit Norma Jean Daniel  http://www.timesofisrael.com/marylin-monroe-reincarnated-in-israeli-doctor/


[Image: hqdefault.jpg]
Margaret Marie http://pegster6941.blogspot.com/


[Image: evaline-25.jpg]
Exquisitely-subtle hoaxer trying to pull our bloody legs with his seemingly-plausible claims -- but after the deepest scrutiny we're on to him.


[Image: SP18643WH_m.jpg]
Still checking on the bona fides of this guy's claim. Seems legit, anyway.


Just for reference (and to uphold Cosmic Rule 34), here's the McCoy, bear-naked (ca. 1953, age 27): 
https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article249967.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/marilyn-monroe-pic-reuters-image-2-39224697.jpg
( ಠ ͜ʖಠ)
...Moving right along (and for strictly spiritually-informational purposes, you understand! La Vrai Marilyn, ca. 1949, age 22,
modeling superbly in her bespoke birthday-suit): 
http://www.marilynmonroe.ca/camera/calendar/
And again (drum-roll, please!) -- ca. 1962, age 35):
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/47/f8/7f/47f87fa1b5ec0227af02e2d715328347.jpg *sigh*

Cheers. Cool

RE: The science of reincarnation - Nicholas - 05-10-2016

@Delkab_Blues

Looks more like David Wilcott to me!

RE: The science of reincarnation - Dekalb_Blues - 07-23-2016

(05-10-2016, 01:57 PM)Nicholas Wrote: @Delkab_Blues

Looks more like David [Wilcock] to me!

[Image: david-wilcock-cayce-soul.jpg] Edgar Cayce vis-à-vis David Wilcock


[Image: 69-david-wilcock-the-source-field-investigations.jpg] David Wilcock vis-à-vis Lon Chaney

[Image: LonChaneySmall.JPG]


[Image: cynthia-lydia060610-q400.jpg] Cynthia Lennon vis-à-vis Mrs. Lydia Robinson
(See http://personalityspirituality.net/2009/12/15/cynthia-lennon-mrs-robinson/)




Only tangentially pertinent, but what the hell. Because the internetz, that's why:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_TahXQ2WiF0s/STLzDCdl6gI/AAAAAAAAIR8/aMuEVXV8gIY/s400/Twins+separated+at+birth+19.jpg
http://www.rubyan.com/politics/archives/separated-at-birth.gif
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2499/133/1600/Picture%201.0.jpg
https://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/hillary.jpg
https://jamesperloff.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/separated-at-birth.jpg?w=619&h=349
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/7700.jpg
http://www.therightplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Separated-at-Birth-Rove-Ham.jpg
http://theblacksphere.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Separated-at-Birth-Prince-Charles.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_TahXQ2WiF0s/STL05Vak56I/AAAAAAAAIUM/4tqOcqCjlgc/s400/Twins+separated+at+birth+01.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_TahXQ2WiF0s/STLz9qydRSI/AAAAAAAAITE/dBfB7yo98oI/s400/Twins+separated+at+birth+10.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HR3JtqIfTiE/TG_j9p5npMI/AAAAAAAABko/Nqq4YdzUYCA/s1600/Separated+At+Birth.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SHpLrUS1ddY/U6Z1Y2_pOgI/AAAAAAAAFfc/cQvT7xx0AaQ/s1600/separated-at-birth.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-f-PdKi-fL7A/VCaPAjWOy5I/AAAAAAAAppY/UgKf9J5hVCs/s1600/separated-at-birth.jpg
http://www.framingthedialogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/saw-cher.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_TahXQ2WiF0s/STLzENTkeQI/AAAAAAAAISM/DT5k_fhObO0/s400/Twins+separated+at+birth+17.jpg
http://www.therightplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Separated-at-Birth-Hillary-Trump.jpg 
http://www.theymightbegiants.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/A66-seperated-at-birth.png
Cool

RE: The science of reincarnation - im_not_me - 07-24-2016

I'm sure sometimes people who reincarnate don't always look the same so that shouldn't be the focus when to trying to prove if someones a reincarnate of someone else...

RE: The science of reincarnation - Dekalb_Blues - 08-06-2016

(07-24-2016, 03:13 AM)im_not_me Wrote: I'm sure sometimes people who reincarnate don't always look the same so that shouldn't be the focus when to trying to prove if someones a reincarnate of someone else...

Yes, certainly, I'm only semi-seriously approaching this interesting subject, in balance to those who might tend to take it a tad too dead-seriously. This is a habit left over from my short career as Shyster-Lawyer® specializing in the art of the advocatus diaboli. I left that pursuit when I found the Bar frowned on simultaneously representing the plaintiff and the defendant in the same trial proceedings, especially when I was caught bribing myself to throw a case. This is the the type of unprogressive, medieval-guild Establishment obstructiveness I also found when I studied architecture under Frank Lloyd Wrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19wf7C4pS7U
As I said -- just the sort of blinkered, philistine pig-ignorant thinking I've come to expect from these reactionary bourgeoise Masonic-lodge types -- they don't care a tinker's cuss about the struggling artist!

Of course one may appear superficially different from one incarnation to the next, but there is always a deep design of familial shared features for those with eyes to see.  For instance, going 'way back, when Rock 'n' Roll meant real rocks, here's me digging some old-school tunes:

[Image: raatum.jpg]

Here I am in a certain mid-19th century incarnation --

[Image: 131.png?resize=660%2C371]

-- then (choosing almost randomly) there's me in this 20th-century female life:

[Image: life_1951_11_05.jpg]

-- compare these to my current august self, circa early 21st Century:

[Image: 703f4c03a748f23f814e5172a20af129.jpg]   Cool





RE: The science of reincarnation - smiLie - 01-16-2019

(02-19-2016, 10:26 AM)Nía Wrote: Research by Dr. Jim B. Tucker:
[Image: Reinkarnation-Kinder-Analyse1.PNG]

Interesting.

Guessing by how statistics may work in this case (making this up to make sense of the numbers):

60% of children are male >> probably because males speak up more, females are probably more afraid to be called crazy. Sounds like a natural 50/50 split here.

70% died violent death >> 70% of those cases male makes perfect sense as it is likely war and danger zone deaths which are mostly males.

90% of children say they were same sex >>> this is interesting. Likely they did not fulfill their purpose in previous life, so they are reincarnating to do it over again?

RE: The science of reincarnation - Rhayader - 01-16-2019

All is one and time isn't linear. We reincarnate as everyone and anyone else, if it resonates. We could very well have a next life that is in the distant past or distant future, or I could even be you and the people in this moment.

RE: The science of reincarnation - smiLie - 01-16-2019

While I agree that All is one. And that time is non-linear to Logos etc.

I don't see how it can be completely non-linear on the 3D planet. Time is ...feature of the planet. You are going destroy Law of Cause and Effect if you allow to reincarnate backwards in time AND give people Free Will.

If you compare our life here as a computer game of 100 levels, where you saved on every level and can go to any at will. This can be seen as having non linear time. But it is the game and it is rigged, meaning every level is always played certain way. You can't have someone go to level 85 directly and do whatever they want (Free Will). And then go back to level 5. Then you may also run into a situation when nobody wants to "play" certain levels, say 15 and 16, then what, not enough reincarnated Souls? You are going to have soul-less human simulators?

Also. Can you have numerous reincarnations? Or one. If more than one, can you have numerous at the same time/space and space/time? Can they run into each other? Can you form a gang of yourselves? How would you carry Karma and other "points" you've earned in the game? All this stuff is from a linear time.

RE: The science of reincarnation - TerryMulhern - 02-21-2019

Quote:Yes, certainly, I'm only semi-seriously approaching this interesting subject, in balance to those who might tend to take it a tad too dead-seriously. This is a habit left over from my short career as Shyster-Lawyer® specializing in the art of the advocatus diaboli. I left that pursuit when I found the Bar frowned on simultaneously representing dissertation writing service research of the plaintiff and the defendant in the same trial proceedings, especially when I was caught bribing myself to throw a case. This is the just the type of unprogressive, medieval-guild Establishment obstructiveness I also found when I studied architecture under Frank Lloyd Wrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RicaXxiU1WM Just the sort of blinkered, philistine pig-ignorant thinking I've come to expect from these reactionary bourgeoise Masonic-lodge types -- they don't care a tinker's cuss about the struggling artist!

Of course one may appear superficially different from one incarnation to the next, but there is always a deep design of familial shared features for those with eyes to see. For instance, going 'way back, when Rock 'n' Roll meant real rocks, here's me digging some old-school tunes.

The science of reincarnation sounds hardly believable as for me - I'm an old nerd of physics and it's crucial that I understand all the space and time relations. Here I do not get the way it all could be done. Just like smiLie said - if it were a computer game?  But alas, it is not. And there's some faint doubt in my head that I am missing something about the way time and space are organized.

RE: The science of reincarnation - Cyan - 02-21-2019

The way I see it is rather odd but I hope it helps.

You have a quantum foam of particle antiparticle pairs appearing and dissapearing at random, this is called zero point field and has a immense energy density. D8

You have a black hole that expands into time space and space time at the same time and is aware of itself, all black holes have all knowledge of everything in the universe but the younger ones are "quicker" to react so much more dangerous, when you die you are placed inside of one, so they have all knowledge like knowledge of death but you can reincarnate anyone you want to and all black holes are one black hole, so the larger ones are "more stable gods" and the small ones are "new memory complexes", thats D6-D7.

You have time created by the initial black hole of the big bang expanding into and making space time, you have the "cold logic realm" created by it expanding into time space. It isnt exactly time and antitime, its more like places where you can make an intituion based guess and jump to a new reality (this one) and where you have to know your reality before you jump (the other one) so its like this one has intuition and the other one has certainty. Thats the 3D-6D.

Then you have the matter-energy horizon of interactions which gives the illusion of 3D at the edge of the initial black hole or the event horizon of the big bang, the only 2 dimensions at that place are energy and matter but their intearction and the uncertaintly principle generates the 3rd dimension and through that, Time as we know it.

So when you die its quite natural that you would be recycled and placed back in the system as the universe uses your energy to continue to expand.

What the universe is looking or is a "even lower vaccuum energy" or a state where it can simulate everything that has happened up to that point with less energy than it takes to make them in its base state, that way when it finds a even better particle interaction it creates a bubble that expands at light speed and converts all matter it comes into contact with into itself and that way into a new universe. ITs a bit hard to explain why this is the way I feel it is but that is just how.

There are so many ways a reincarnation could be simulated that it boggles the mind, there is in my view only the certainty that energy never loses, its just converted to a new form.