(10-05-2016, 12:04 PM)Aion Wrote: I presume you are actually reading the material alongside this?

(10-05-2016, 12:50 PM)Aion Wrote: What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

(10-05-2016, 01:00 PM)Chandlersdad Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 12:50 PM)Aion Wrote: What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

DID YOU CLICK ON THE URL TO EVEN LOOK AT IT?

SO FAR 45 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS POST AND NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS CLICKED ON THE DANG URL!!!  WHAT KIND OF SINCERE SPIRITUAL SEEKING IS THAT?  YOU CAN'T EVEN TAKE A FEW SECONDS TO GLANCE AT WHAT I CREATED? YES, I AM YELLING.  :@

(10-05-2016, 01:05 PM)Aion Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 01:00 PM)Chandlersdad Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 12:50 PM)Aion Wrote: What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

DID YOU CLICK ON THE URL TO EVEN LOOK AT IT?

SO FAR 45 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS POST AND NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS CLICKED ON THE DANG URL!!!  WHAT KIND OF SINCERE SPIRITUAL SEEKING IS THAT?  YOU CAN'T EVEN TAKE A FEW SECONDS TO GLANCE AT WHAT I CREATED? YES, I AM YELLING.  :@

Um, I did click on it and browsed through the first dozen or so and beyond, but I am on my mobile which doesn't offer the best set up for reading detailed .PDFs in the first place.

Since you are merely yelling at me I assume you are offended by something I said?

(10-05-2016, 01:13 PM)GentleWanderer Wrote: I've gave a quick look to your text presentation and will read it more, it's a very good job, thumb up ! Is it possible to download it ?

(10-05-2016, 01:32 PM)YinYang Wrote: I think it's pretty cool, I would just give Scott Mandelker a miss after the gay thread...

I enjoyed your pics! Where did you find this pic?



I would love to purchase it and blow it up, as a reminder of harvest.

(10-05-2016, 01:21 PM)Aion Wrote: Well, I mean, this thread has only been here for 10 hours and at least for me it is only 10am so maaaybe a bit of time is needed? It was likely the hosting site issue though.

(10-05-2016, 01:14 PM)Chandlersdad Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 01:05 PM)Aion Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 01:00 PM)Chandlersdad Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 12:50 PM)Aion Wrote: What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

DID YOU CLICK ON THE URL TO EVEN LOOK AT IT?

SO FAR 45 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS POST AND NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS CLICKED ON THE DANG URL!!!  WHAT KIND OF SINCERE SPIRITUAL SEEKING IS THAT?  YOU CAN'T EVEN TAKE A FEW SECONDS TO GLANCE AT WHAT I CREATED? YES, I AM YELLING.  :@

Um, I did click on it and browsed through the first dozen or so and beyond, but I am on my mobile which doesn't offer the best set up for reading detailed .PDFs in the first place.

Since you are merely yelling at me I assume you are offended by something I said?

No, I was not focusing on you. I should have made a separate post for that tirade. I went to the website hosting the document. They said NO ONE had looked at the document so far. That is why I was annoyed. I am not going for fame and stardom here. I just know that if I saw a post that had a link to a document someone here created, I would eagerly check it out. But maybe the website that hosts it just isn't picking up people checking it out.

(10-05-2016, 02:52 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 01:14 PM)Chandlersdad Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 01:05 PM)Aion Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 01:00 PM)Chandlersdad Wrote:

(10-05-2016, 12:50 PM)Aion Wrote: What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

DID YOU CLICK ON THE URL TO EVEN LOOK AT IT?

SO FAR 45 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS POST AND NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS CLICKED ON THE DANG URL!!!  WHAT KIND OF SINCERE SPIRITUAL SEEKING IS THAT?  YOU CAN'T EVEN TAKE A FEW SECONDS TO GLANCE AT WHAT I CREATED? YES, I AM YELLING.  :@

Um, I did click on it and browsed through the first dozen or so and beyond, but I am on my mobile which doesn't offer the best set up for reading detailed .PDFs in the first place.

Since you are merely yelling at me I assume you are offended by something I said?

No, I was not focusing on you. I should have made a separate post for that tirade. I went to the website hosting the document. They said NO ONE had looked at the document so far. That is why I was annoyed. I am not going for fame and stardom here. I just know that if I saw a post that had a link to a document someone here created, I would eagerly check it out. But maybe the website that hosts it just isn't picking up people checking it out.

I had clicked it earlier this morning as well and clicked all the way through to the end. I think something is wrong with the hosting site.

(10-06-2016, 11:52 AM)BlatzAdict Wrote: wow this is a full on study guide, this should be a website in it of itself.

are people who haven't learned Law of One fools? maybe it's not entirely Law of One, it's simply, for the most part people who haven't learned about their chakras, tend to be led by their emotions, rather than being in the driver seat. 

people who haven't done the work to free themselves emotionally, continue to make either themselves or those close to them suffer. is that foolish? yes, but it's not a bad thing, emotional maturity is a learned behavior, and having the opportunity for growth. There's no such thing as a right or a wrong, it's possible to attain sixth density awareness in a third dimensional body, I can see the information flow with how you put down the ideas and then how you try to reconcile the thoughts in red text. I haven't had a chance or the time to look through the whole thing, but so far it's good though I can see where you would benefit from learning specific concepts from others. I would have hoped you put something like that in a forum post as a general question.

I can even understand why Scott would make several monikers about non LOO students as being fools, though it's not said in a way that is meant to be derogatory, it's simply observing the fact that non initiates of any type of spirituality, will not always be working consciously with their emotions. Service to others does not always imply service to the self, since Ra refers to others as other selves it is simply part of the equation. Learning to honestly polarize, is not a selfish act, since it's done with the intention of serving all.

How long did it take you to compile all of this and edit it?

(10-06-2016, 01:51 PM)YinYang Wrote: Chandlersdad, I'm just curious... this guy really should not be teaching the Ra material, that is plain to see from your document.



I guess I'm just wondering why you are so persistent on sticking to this source, and even distributing it. I just need to add that my inquiry is not a judgement of any kind, it's really in good spirit, I have learned by now that this written medium can make things come across in a way that was not intended at all.

The New Age community has enough self appointed know-at-alls with superiority complexes, so giving them more exposure is just strange to me. Your comments in red reflects your own admittance that the guy should not be teaching, and I guess that's why I have a question mark hanging over my head.

PS. Maybe I'm the one in the wrong, I mean we have seen how many people found LL/Research because of David Wilcock, so maybe the more people "teaching" it, the better... I don't know...

(10-06-2016, 02:16 PM)YinYang Wrote:

If he said this, then he's an authoritarian personality teaching the Ra material...

Quote:I hope you will go through the material. I sincerely hoped people would do so at their own leisure and even point out where Scott is wrong. I had this fantasy that people would really get involved in this as a project.

(10-06-2016, 03:46 PM)YinYang Wrote: Okay, everyone must take the approach which they are comfortable with, and if you have found yours, cool!

Quote:I hope you will go through the material. I sincerely hoped people would do so at their own leisure and even point out where Scott is wrong. I had this fantasy that people would really get involved in this as a project.

Well, you see, I don't consider him a teacher after the gay thread and now this one, I think he inserts his own erroneous biases and understandings (not to mention prejudices, and-and-and), so I'll be giving it a miss, though I can see that you've put a lot of effort into it, it looks good.

I have gotten burned by authoritarian personalities posing as spiritual teachers, so if I just get a whiff of authoritarianism and superiority, I'm outa there! I guess it's 'once bitten, twice shy' for me.