Quote:74.17 Questioner: I assume that the reason that the rituals that have been used previously are of effect is that these words have built a bias in consciousness of those who have worked in these areas so that those who are of the distortion of mind that we seek will respond to the imprint in consciousness of these series of words. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is, to a great extent, correct. The exception is the sounding of some of what you call your Hebrew and some of what you call your Sanskrit vowels. These sound vibration complexes have power before time and space and represent configurations of light which built all that there is.

Quote:74.19 Questioner: How did the users of these sounds, Sanskrit and Hebrew, determine what these sounds were?

Ra: I am Ra. In the case of the Hebrew that entity known as Yahweh aided this knowledge through impression upon the material of genetic coding which became language, as you call it.

In the case of Sanskrit the sound vibrations are pure due to the lack of previous what you call alphabet or letter-naming. Thus the sound vibration complexes seemed to fall into place as from the Logos. This was a more, shall we say, natural or unaided situation or process.

Quote:Chapter One

YAH, the Lord of Hosts, the living Elohim, King of the Universe, Omnipotent, the Merciful and Gracious God, Supreme and Extolled, Dweller in the Height whose habitation is Eternity, who is Sublime and Most-Holy, engraved His name and ordained (formed) and created the Universe in thirty-two mystical paths (stages) of wisdom (science), by three Seraphim, namely, Numbers, Letters, and Sounds, which are in Him one and the same.

(02-17-2019, 12:13 AM)flofrog Wrote: I don't know for Hebrew, but I know that for Sanskrit there is a specific flow with a number of vowels, 'a' in majority which is vibrated in a way that we do not vibrate vowels in english. Sanskrit 'sings' vowel in a way I have never heard another language being spoken. Don't know if Hebrew is the same ?

(02-17-2019, 12:13 AM)flofrog Wrote: I know that for Sanskrit there is a specific flow with a number of vowels, 'a' in majority which is vibrated in a way that we do not vibrate vowels in english.  Sanskrit 'sings' vowel in a way I have never heard another language being spoken.   Don't know if Hebrew is the same ?

(02-17-2019, 12:13 AM)flofrog Wrote: I know that for Sanskrit there is a specific flow with a number of vowels, 'a' in majority which is vibrated in a way that we do not vibrate vowels in english.  Sanskrit 'sings' vowel in a way I have never heard another language being spoken.

(02-16-2019, 09:46 PM)MangusKhan Wrote: How are the vowels different, so as to have "power before time and space"? And how does simply lacking an alphabet cause language to develop "as from the logos"? Didn't all peoples begin to speak before they had alphabets?

(02-18-2019, 10:28 AM)smiLie Wrote:

(02-16-2019, 09:46 PM)MangusKhan Wrote: How are the vowels different, so as to have "power before time and space"? And how does simply lacking an alphabet cause language to develop "as from the logos"? Didn't all peoples begin to speak before they had alphabets?

Exactly.

There's no "evolution" anywhere here. People speak words in their own minds. Dogs and animals don't. If you take a baby away from human environment and he grows up with wolves , then he doesn't develop language, and no amount of PhDs in linguistics can make him. Brain , while developing, takes whatever it is that's spoken around the child and develops its own mechanism of speech, that later in life it's nearly impossible to duplicate. This is regardless of the language spoken around the child. This is built into our brain's development , and thus built into our DNA.

We also think in visuals/pictures and words. How did we think in the past if we had no language? Not in words? Why did we then develop words, and not some telepathy?

It all points to the fact that we already had a language. That language comes first. That we could not possibly "develop" it "ourselves".

Now.... "lack of alphabet" - this is if you subscribe to the modern "version" of history , and it's very poor. It has been shown that we had perfectly working alphabet at least as far back as 40,000 years (this is very annoying to some) . And even, possibly, a million years back (this is REALLY annoying to some).

What I am trying to say is that if we are not alone in the universe, and if we "communicate" "with higher beings"  then we were clearly given an alphabet. This is bummer for the "evolutionists".

Another idea. If you subscribe to the theory of the informational field. Then any human would need "keys" to this library, which would be , I presume, part DNA, part developed (so that only specific humans can get to specific sections of the library, and only per request). It is my current understanding that you can either speak or think a specific request, and you may be granted access to specific knowledge. In either case, it is an "informational request" or a query in WORDS.

(02-18-2019, 11:11 AM)smiLie Wrote: I will explain my post above on english alphabet.

If I read and understand it correctly, it was formed around 12th century or so (let's for now assume current timeline), not really known how, but theory says based on celtic alphabet with nordic envasion there.

I've been to many different countries, including a number of islands of the caribbean. Caribbean islands is a perfect example, you'll see a mix of white, black / african, etc. Majority of whites were not that educated , sailors etc. Blacks are also lacking and lagging behind in language. So, there, they developed a simplified version of the language. Language DEGRADED from original. Not developed a new pattern, it DEGRADED.

You can find this on any islandic situation, it is very common.

So, if language degrades on the island, why the  British islands are any different?

Also, we know since it's an island, poor health, rain all the time etc. and sailors - all kind of teeth problems. When you speak when some teeth are completely out you can simulate well some really strange sounds of the english language such as TH and it's other wording as if someone chews something while speaking.

ANd not to forget nordic people were warriors , clearly was just an invasion, they weren't really that outspoken .

Let's summarize. English is developed a few centuries back on an island via invasion of some sailors and warriors with bad teeth.

So. Million dollar question:

WHICH LANGUAGE DID BRITISH ENGLISH DEGRADE FROM?

And back to Infinity comment: if it is a degraded version of some language that is vibration of the One, is this THE RIGHT vibration

(02-16-2019, 07:13 PM)Bring4th_Plenum Wrote: My question here is more about the 'scripting' of both these Languages.

The actual WRITTEN LETTERS of Hebrew and Sanskrit.

Do you think they have any significance, in terms of some kind of geometry, or shaping of the letters?

I recall watching a vid many years ago that made grand claims about the Hebrew alphabet, and how it connected to various intrinsic geometries etc.  But the guy seemed to withhold a lot of his data - and so it was a claim, at best.