Mathematical interpretation of The Creation - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Spiritual Development & Metaphysical Matters (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: Mathematical interpretation of The Creation (/showthread.php?tid=17859) |
Mathematical interpretation of The Creation - meadow-foreigner - 12-20-2019 Salutations. I do believe it's possible to unravel the history of The Creation from a mathematical perspective. It is known to anyone who looks closely that The Creation has a set of patterns and coefficients that shows up everywhere. Mathematical ratios such as Phi and Pi make up for the most beautiful things, from micro to macrocosm. I believe many of you are familiar with the work and genius of Nicola Tesla. Quote:11.25 ▶ Questioner: Then I assume you can’t name him and would ask you where Nikola Tesla got his information? It has been attributed to Tesla the saying that the 3, 6, and 9 contain one of the keys to understanding the Universe. Well, I decided to examine this issue a little further. I'm no graduated mathematician - nevertheless, I am quite fascinated by math and how it sings about The Creation. So I decided to combine Pascal's Triangle with single-digit numbers only - I would sum the digits of the numbers to always get a single number. The formula is very simple: (a+b)^n, with n ranging from 0 to infinity. Then you take only the numbers and put them in this layout, summing the digits so you always get a single-digit number (i.e: 27 = 2+7 = 9) And by doing so, an interesting pattern occurred - the Sierpinski Triangle shape, which is a fractal. But looking at the triangle at a macro scale wouldn't be enough to understand its depth, from my perspective, so let's take a look at it's most basic piece: 1 11 121 1331 14641 151151 1662661 17388371 181272181 1993993991 11933933911 ... If we take a look at the first line - there's only 1. Unity. Infinity. Quote:13.5 ▶ Questioner: Thank you. Can you tell me of the earliest, first known thing in the creation? In the second line, there's Infinity becoming aware of itself. Awareness can be mathematically displayed as the second 1. How would one be aware of oneself? Knowing the full extent of its existence. The extent is Infinity, and Infinity here in our perspective is 1. In the third line, there's the first 2, which represents the first step towards The Creation as we know it - Infinite Energy. Quote:13.7 ▶ Questioner: After this, what happened? Then it gets interesting. Quote:13.8 ▶ Questioner: Can you state the next step? Which corresponds to the line 1331 of the triangle. Coincidentally or not, the 3rd Density. The following line has a 6 in it. One interpretation of it is the Higher Self and its communication with the other densities, but it really is fractally unending in interpretation. And so it goes. I've created an Excel sheet which automatizes this whole thing, and painted each number with a specific color, as the following picture displays: What are your thoughts on it? RE: Mathematical interpretation of The Creation - Diana - 12-21-2019 Interesting. I would change one thing. That 0 be infinity. And 1 can be unity and with it the focusing (intelligent infinity) from infinity. O would be the unmanifest and 1+ the manifest. Implicate and explicate. Wave and particle. RE: Mathematical interpretation of The Creation - meadow-foreigner - 12-21-2019 (12-21-2019, 12:27 PM)Diana Wrote: Interesting. I would change one thing. That 0 be infinity. And 1 can be unity and with it the focusing (intelligent infinity) from infinity. O would be the unmanifest and 1+ the manifest. Implicate and explicate. Wave and particle. That could work. 1 would then be Infinite Intelligence, and 11 would be Infinite Energy + Infinite Intelligence, the two primary distortions from which everything sprung. RE: Mathematical interpretation of The Creation - loostudent - 01-04-2020 |