(07-08-2021, 02:56 PM)Loki Wrote: The higher self of a social memory complex appears when multiple conscious strings (entities) unify their conscience while in creation. The multiple conscious strings with their ends unified in Creation and in Creator become a single string of consciousness.

Ra Wrote:16.21 Questioner: Can you give me some kind of history of your social memory complex and how you became aware of the Law of One?

Ra: I am Ra. The path of our learning is graven in the present moment. There is no history, as we understand your concept. Picture, if you will, a circle of being. We know the alpha and omega as infinite intelligence. The circle never ceases. It is present. The densities we have traversed at various points in the circle correspond to the characteristics of cycles: first, the cycle of awareness; second, the cycle of growth; third, the cycle of self-awareness; fourth, the cycle of love or understanding; fifth, the cycle of light or wisdom; sixth, the cycle of light/love, love/light, or unity; seventh, the gateway cycle; eighth, the octave which moves into a mystery we do not plumb.

16.22 Questioner: Thank you very much. In previous material, before we communicated with you, it was stated by the Confederation that there is actually no past or future… all is present. Would this be a good analogy?

Ra: I am Ra. There is past, present, and future in third density. In an overview such as an entity may have, removed from the space/time continuum, it may be seen that in the cycle of completion there exists only the present. We, ourselves, seek to learn this understanding. At the seventh level or dimension, we shall, if our humble efforts are sufficient, become one with all, thus having no memory, no identity, no past or future, but existing in the all.

(07-08-2021, 02:56 PM)Loki Wrote: I want to apologize in advance for potentially wasting your time by reading the following.

It seems to me that the Creator and its Creation cannot be explained without a consciousness form of absolute time which is ignited when the Infinity becomes aware.

The emergence of Intelligent Infinity results in ignition of consciousness absolute time and the activation of free will. Intention or thinking are a sequential conscious manifestations which are constrained by a certain order in the sequence. Any change of order in the sequence would result in a change of the outcome. But the sequential nature of thinking implies that even during the a-temporal phase of creation there is a form of temporal manifestation at consciousness level.  

Channelling knowledge tells us there are two forms of evolution a temporal phase when the space/time time/space are active and an a-temporal phase in the very beginning and towards the end of creation.

Judging from the material it seems that space/time and time/space are not really two sides of the same coin but there is rather a hierarchical relation between the two. Space/time is what in fact creates the temporal portion of creation and can be associated with Matter but time/space is technically the a-temporal phase of creation and is associated with Love/Light. As result between incarnations we move from the temporal to the a-temporal plane. But in the a-temporal phase of the creation there is still a consciousness time passing when decisions are made.    

This has some implications. There is only a unique present moment from consciousness time point of view. While the Creator can individualize itself up to entity level all parts of the Creator will be in the same present moment of the consciousness time. This makes true simultaneity impossible at consciousness time level and at creation level.

Moving up from space/time (temporal) to time/space (a-temporal) we can review all the past present moments and all the future present moments. This is the simultaneity we are allowed to see but this does not mean we can ever turn-back and take a different path from an intersection and it is not a true simultaneity. Between incarnations when we review the snapshots of past presents or of future presents we will still look at them as at a real present but they are not. From creation point of view the only difference and the most important between a real present and a past or future present is the fact that the real present is associated with the consciousness time present while all the other presents are not.

While this consciousness time might be hard to digest it helps clarifying the Higher Self. If we include the consciousness absolute time the difference between higher self and self becomes just a matter of vantage point.

We entities are strings of individualized consciousness with one end anchored in Creator and unity through the spirit, and the other end anchored in Creation and individuality though the body.
Between the Creation and Creator both consciousness and matter (intelligent light) ascend on the conscious dimension. Higher Self is a matter of vantage point somewhere between Creator and Creation.
A vantage point from where all the past and future moments up to sixth density can be seen at all time. When the self opens the time/space door moves up from space/time closer to Creator and can pick at past and future.

The higher self of a social memory complex appears when multiple conscious strings (entities) unify their conscience while in creation. The multiple conscious strings with their ends unified in Creation and in Creator become a single string of consciousness.

Law of One Wrote:70.11 Questioner: Would an analogy for this situation be that the individual’s higher self is manipulating to some extent, shall I say, the mind/body/spirit complex that is its analog, you might say, to move it through the lower densities for purposes of gaining experience and then finally transferring that experience or amalgamating it, you might say, in mid-sixth density with the higher self?

Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The Higher Self does not manipulate its past selves. It protects when possible and guides when asked, but the force of free will is paramount. The seeming contradictions of determinism and free will melt when it is accepted that there is such a thing as true simultaneity. The Higher Self is the end result of all the development experienced by the mind/body/spirit complex to that point.

(07-09-2021, 07:13 AM)Loki Wrote: Sorry for ambiguity but indeed unifying conscience means multiple mind/body/spirit complexes unifying their conscious mind in seeking, under free will, while incarnated.
I do not want to deny the existing material I just want to extend a bit the understanding beyond the given material.

Quote:29.11 QUESTIONER Thank you. Yesterday you stated that planets in first density are in a timeless state to begin with. Can you tell me how the effect we appreciate as time comes into being?

RA I am Ra. We have just described to you the state of beingness of each Logos. The process by which space/time comes into continuum form is a function of the careful building, shall we say, of an entire, or whole, plan of vibratory rates, densities, and potentials. When this plan has coalesced in the thought complexes of Love, then the physical manifestations begin to appear; this first manifestation stage being awareness or consciousness.

At the point at which this coalescence is at the livingness or beingness point—the point, or fountainhead, of beginning—space/time then begins to unroll its scroll of livingness.

(07-12-2021, 06:49 AM)Loki Wrote: If your concept of consciousness time was true, then there would be no free will as is the common argument against either free will in a universe with an omniscient creator. More specifically you would have to decide whether free will exists, or whether the higher self exists. Sequential consciousness time would necessitate that there would be no difference between the looking back between lives and the higher self overseeing lives.

(07-12-2021, 06:49 AM)Loki Wrote: If your concept of consciousness time was true, then there would be no free will as is the common argument against either free will in a universe with an omniscient creator. More specifically you would have to decide whether free will exists, or whether the higher self exists. Sequential consciousness time would necessitate that there would be no difference between the looking back between lives and the higher self overseeing lives.

From my point of view the presence of absolute consciousness time does not exclude free will because while the past present moments certainly happened the future present moments are only potential until they happen. Only one of the multiple possible future presents associated to a certain moment in time will become reality the other ones, while possible, will never happen. Same is truth for the past presents, there is the line of past presents we followed using our free will but there were millions of other possible paths at every past moments and we never took. From all the many possibilities our free will will only chose one in each present moment while all the other will fall from potential to never-happened. Complex totality is made in the beginning of our evolution only from possibilities/probabilities. As we progress on our destiny some of the possibilities are replaced by certainties because of our decisions under the rule of free will. Just before returning to the Creator in seventh density our complex totality will be almost all certainties and very few uncertainties/possibilities left.

The absolute consciousness present is the present all the channelling sources talk about as being the only real thing in creation. And the golden present moment of conscious time splits creation in certainty/past and possibility/future. That golden present of absolute consciousness time is where free will operate.

Just because we can look at any path in the past or any possibility in the future and they look very real does not mean they will ever happen.
Alternative paths from the past which we never took will not be recorded in our complex totality, but they were part of it (as possibilities) at one moment when that past was still future. The only path recorded by our complex totality from myriad of possible paths is the one our free will choose. All the others will disappear from the Complex totality even though at one point were recorded as possible.

Law of One Wrote:16.51 Questioner: Could you define the word density as we have been using it to give us a little greater idea of the concept of this term when used by you?

Ra: I am Ra. The term density is a, what you would call, mathematical one. The closest analogy is that of music, whereby after seven notes on your western type of scale, if you will, the eighth note begins a new octave. Within your great octave of existence which we share with you, there are seven octaves or densities. Within each density there are seven sub-densities. Within each sub-density, seven sub-sub-densities, and so on infinitely.

16.52 Questioner: I notice that the time we have used has gone slightly over an hour. I would prefer to continue but I want to ask at this time as to the condition of the instrument.

Ra: I am Ra. This instrument is in balance. It is well to continue if you desire.

16.53 Questioner: All right. Continuing with what we were just talking about, namely densities: I understand then that each density has seven sub-densities which again have seven sub-densities which again have seven sub-densities. This expands at an extremely large rate as things are increased in powers of seven. Does this mean that in any density level anything that you can think of is happening? And many things that you never thought of are happening… are there… everything is happening… this is confusing…

Ra: I am Ra. From your confusion we select the concept with which you struggle, that being infinite opportunity. You may consider any possibility/probability complex as having an existence.

16.54 Questioner: Does what we do, when we think of possibilities that can occur, say daydreaming: Do these become real in these densities?

Ra: I am Ra. This depends upon the nature of the daydream. This is a large subject. Perhaps the simplest thing we can say is, if the daydream, as you call it, is one which attracts to self, this then becomes reality to self. If it is contemplative general daydream, this may enter the infinity of possibility/probability complexes and occur elsewhere, having no particular attachment to the energy fields of the creator.

16.55 Questioner: To make this a little more clear, if I were to daydream strongly about building a ship, would this occur in one of these other densities?

Ra: I am Ra. This would, would have, or shall occur.

16.56 Questioner: And then if, say, an entity daydreams strongly about battling, let us say, another entity, would this occur?

Ra: I am Ra. In this case the entity’s fantasy concerns the self and other-self; this binds the thought-form to the possibility/probability complex connected with the self which is the creator of this thought-form. This then would increase the possibility/probability of bringing this into third-density occurrence.

(07-12-2021, 06:49 AM)Loki Wrote: If your concept of consciousness time was true, then there would be no free will as is the common argument against either free will in a universe with an omniscient creator. More specifically you would have to decide whether free will exists, or whether the higher self exists. Sequential consciousness time would necessitate that there would be no difference between the looking back between lives and the higher self overseeing lives.

https://llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/2021/2021_0219.aspx Wrote:Q'uo:
What is the right use of will? My friends, this is a question which will be with you for a long time to come, well beyond your present lifetime and, indeed, this present density. For the will is, as Ra described it, the "great conduit to the Creator." In the experiment, shall we say, that is the creation, each of the Creator's parts are endowed with this will. This will is baked into the design of your beingness. It is that primal mechanism whereby you will choose your method of self-discovery; choose among an infinite variety of choices, your pathway to the Creator; choose your manner of beingness and expression and the duration and extent and entanglement of confusion as you teeter between that primal balance of acceptance and resistance.

Aiming the will towards acceptance is, we would say, a skillful use of will, for each act of acceptance smooths the journey and aligns one's self with, you might say, a more organic evolutionary path. This is not to say that there are wrong choices, per se, or that there are mistakes. In the macrocosmic sense, every use of will is a right use of will, for even in confusion, even in resistance and negation, the self will be meeting the self. Even if what is met is resisted or run from, that, too, teaches—and, once consciously embraced, will reveal self to self.

These seemingly dual or paradoxical uses of will, wherein one seeks a goal versus accepts what is presented, may be framed and approached in a variety of ways—one of which we would submit for your consideration is as something of a continuum, whereby one mode transitions into the other by that faculty made possible through acceptance, which is perhaps taken to an even higher level, which you might call trust or faith.

For in the personal use of will, which the Creator hopes that you will exercise in your choice-making journey, the more that you can set the will to the vibration and practice of acceptance, the more that your own will blends with the one will. And [if] trust [is exercised] that that which you are experiencing is the fruit of your personal will, then that which is reflected back to you—particularly and especially the difficult and challenging catalyst, the limitations, and the pain—is, shall we say, [understood to be] the universe working for you. [It is] the intelligent, responsive, adaptive illusion providing you the material that you wanted; on a fundamental level, material that is shaped by preincarnational bias and imprinting, and then continued with the exercise of the incarnate will.

(07-12-2021, 11:56 AM)tadeus Wrote:

(07-12-2021, 06:49 AM)Loki Wrote: If your concept of consciousness time was true, then there would be no free will as is the common argument against either free will in a universe with an omniscient creator. More specifically you would have to decide whether free will exists, or whether the higher self exists. Sequential consciousness time would necessitate that there would be no difference between the looking back between lives and the higher self overseeing lives.

It's my free will to have consciousness about the time and the flow of time itself and it works.

And of course it is my free will to have a free will!  

(07-15-2021, 04:49 PM)Dtris Wrote: The portion underlined by Loki was quoting myself.

(07-16-2021, 01:55 PM)Loki Wrote: Why will you go back and change you individual path of experience?

Don't humans like to think about time travel where they go back correcting past errors? Physics claim that such thing might even be possible. I believe despite our optimism such trip back to correct stuff is a paradox not allowed by creator.

(07-16-2021, 01:55 PM)Loki Wrote: Why will you go back and change you individual path of experience?

Don't humans like to think about time travel where they go back correcting past errors? Physics claim that such thing might even be possible. I believe despite our optimism such trip back to correct stuff is a paradox not allowed by creator.

(07-21-2021, 11:47 AM)jafar Wrote: One can go back and forward in time but that will not 'change' the entity path of experience.