(08-06-2012, 09:26 AM)ShinAr Wrote: It would be wise of all LOO students to remember this and to diligently seek for inaccuracies as they study to make sure they are not misled by mistake. Mistakes that could be made in the transmission or the receiving ends of that sharing of fields.

I will say that what I have picked up on is that Ra has, on occasion, used the term Intelligent Infinity when they meant to use Intelligent Energy.

(08-06-2012, 05:29 PM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote: I think one of the more curious communication kerfuffles in the material is Ra's use of the word "galaxy." Why would Ra have a different definition for an English word with its origins being directly related to the Milky Way Galaxy?

And this wasn't just a mistake in communication...Ra specifically said that they consider our local star system to be a galaxy. Why?

(08-06-2012, 05:29 PM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote: And this wasn't just a mistake in communication...Ra specifically said that they consider our local star system to be a galaxy. Why?

Quote:13.13 Questioner: Was the galaxy that we are in created by the infinite intelligence or was it created by a portion of the infinite intelligence?

Ra: I am Ra. The galaxy and all other things of material of which you are aware are products of individualized portions of intelligent infinity. As each exploration began, it, in turn, found its focus and became co-Creator. Using intelligent infinity each portion created an universe and allowing the rhythms of free choice to flow, playing with the infinite spectrum of possibilities, each individualized portion channeled the love/light into what you might call intelligent energy, thus creating the so-called Natural Laws of any particular universe.

Each universe, in turn, individualized to a focus becoming, in turn, co-Creator and allowing further diversity, thus creating further intelligent energies regularizing or causing Natural Laws to appear in the vibrational patterns of what you would call a solar system. Thus, each solar system has its own, shall we say, local coordinate system of illusory Natural Laws. It shall be understood that any portion, no matter how small, of any density or illusory pattern contains, as in an holographic picture, the One Creator which is infinity. Thus all begins and ends in mystery.

(08-06-2012, 05:29 PM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote: Ra specifically said that they consider our local star system to be a galaxy. Why?

(08-06-2012, 06:17 PM)Patrick Wrote: But "There are no mistakes under the Law of One" ~ Ra 12.24

---

(08-06-2012, 05:29 PM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote: I think one of the more curious communication kerfuffles in the material is Ra's use of the word "galaxy." Why would Ra have a different definition for an English word with its origins being directly related to the Milky Way Galaxy?

And this wasn't just a mistake in communication...Ra specifically said that they consider our local star system to be a galaxy. Why?

Why indeed. Maybe there is a lot more to our "star system" than meets the eyes.

(08-06-2012, 07:15 PM)zenmaster Wrote:

(08-06-2012, 05:29 PM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote: Ra specifically said that they consider our local star system to be a galaxy. Why?

I think it's due to the time/space and multidimensional nature of star systems which is not measurable yet. They chose the best word that we had, and that was 'galaxy' - because, perhaps the actual manifold and extensive constructs involved - hyper-dimensionally and metaphysically - would be better defined by that term.

---

After considering that quote, it could be that the holographic nature of an area of creation - a solar system - is merely sufficient to express the entirety its host galaxy. That is, within the constraints of Ra's level of consciousness.

(08-06-2012, 06:17 PM)Patrick Wrote: But "There are no mistakes under the Law of One" ~ Ra 12.24

(08-07-2012, 09:47 AM)Siren Wrote:

(08-06-2012, 06:17 PM)Patrick Wrote: But "There are no mistakes under the Law of One" ~ Ra 12.24

But there are mistakes in the Ra Material ^.~

(08-07-2012, 01:05 AM)Conifer16 Wrote: so does this quote also suggest that eventually we could all become as the sun is to ourselves, a logos of beings we helped create. Basically the next step after the solar system following the galaxy and universe. And what do you think might that creation then be? :-) Now thats a fascinating question, at least to me :-)

Conifer17
Namaste
I love you <3 :-)

Quote:13.7 Ra: Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to your ears being “Logos” or “Love.” The Creator is the focusing of infinity as an aware or conscious principle called by us as closely as we can create understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity.

(08-08-2012, 04:21 PM)Spaced Wrote: I believe Ra defines a Logos as the focusing of infinity into intelligent energy.

Quote:13.7 Ra: Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to your ears being “Logos” or “Love.” The Creator is the focusing of infinity as an aware or conscious principle called by us as closely as we can create understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity.

(08-08-2012, 04:21 PM)Spaced Wrote: I believe Ra defines a Logos as the focusing of infinity into intelligent energy.

Quote:13.7 Ra: Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to your ears being “Logos” or “Love.” The Creator is the focusing of infinity as an aware or conscious principle called by us as closely as we can create understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity.