I agree in that context. I was speaking of removing the 'negative tares' of 3D STS on a planet slated to move to 4D+ once the 75,000 year cycle is done. I've explained why I think there may be validity to this idea many times. I accept that people will dismiss it, but that will not change my decision to engage with the idea.
That battle is not to happen here on this planet. It is to happen over other-selves; not ourselves. Is it impossible that the 'striking of the hour' will see a purge of the active negative (STS) presence on the planet? I don't remember Ra saying that the graduating 4D negatives will be fighting over the planet with the positives post-harvest. 4D negatives go their own way; maybe the 'guardians' are simply those who chaffeur them off to their new home.
Quote:The fourth density is the only density besides your own which, lacking the wisdom to refrain from battle, sees the necessity of the battle. Thus it is necessary that fourth-density social memory complexes be used.
That battle is not to happen here on this planet. It is to happen over other-selves; not ourselves. Is it impossible that the 'striking of the hour' will see a purge of the active negative (STS) presence on the planet? I don't remember Ra saying that the graduating 4D negatives will be fighting over the planet with the positives post-harvest. 4D negatives go their own way; maybe the 'guardians' are simply those who chaffeur them off to their new home.