04-29-2013, 07:45 PM
(04-29-2013, 03:07 PM)1109 Wrote: One thing that's been buggering me is the fact that Ra at one point gives the percentages of planets of the different densities. According to them third density, which is the shortest by far, has the highest percentage. How can this be? Are many planets spinning third density cycles over and over and over again? Even if the two highest densities are skewing the statistics third is still more common than first and second.I think the idea is that 3D has more of a dependency on planets to evolve whereas 1D, and 2D do not...
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)