(07-11-2017, 01:15 PM)Diana Wrote: 2. As SMC pointed out, we must bear in mind that no channeling is perfect due to the humans it must filter through.
no... I wasn't saying this at all
(07-11-2017, 01:15 PM)Diana Wrote: I think the Ra material is of the purest and highest, as the 3 involved took very careful care to prepare on every level they knew of for, and they were as accountable and responsible as they knew how to be.
I agree with this - but they did this to ensure quality/veracity - not content. Content (in the reply) was always determined by Ra. (Actually Ra also helped monitor/ensure quality/veracity.)
(07-11-2017, 01:15 PM)Diana Wrote: Even so, all 3 have (had) their own distortions.which determined the type, tone and content of their questions to Ra - but did not distort or compromise Ra's replies; but may have limited the extent of/depth of replies.
(07-11-2017, 01:15 PM)Diana Wrote: Ra seemed to tread very carefully when approaching subject matter which could potentially affect those distortions.
I agree with this - NOT to the point of incorrect information - but of a more 'diffident' expression of information which could be interpreted by readers/listeners incorrectly due to individual word interpretation/decade of transmission/etc
and the wish to avoid modifying and/or removing catalyst
the interesting thing is that people are particularly able to interpret on this issue according to their own biases/distortions with this - which may have been Ra's intention... (not infringing is a constant and delicate dance...)