Comparing Ra and the Cassiopaeans

[Asolsutsesvyl]

@meadow-foreigner, that reminds me of several things I haven't posted yet. On the "bad future" and sci-fi-like scenarios of that kind, years ago another member of the Cassiopaea forum wrote a short overview bringing together related channeled/"inspired" views on that theme. I'll quote that later, for those curious about the C's and Pleiadians and the related somewhat doom-and-gloom perspective.

It is a display of maturity to get in touch with different perspectives of the same prism and to figure out the explicit and underlying connections. In that sense, it might do everyone some good to do so.

Something different that's been on my mind is a theory which makes for an alternative way to try to make sense of the C's and their messages. Is it, at least roughly, some kind of weird mirror image of the truth? It's interesting to look at in that way, so in this post and later I'll explore along that line.

LKJ has long championed the view that in the early years, the C's communicated in a code in which they said things about other persons and things instead of the hidden "real" subject, and the "real" message was for LKJ alone to correctly perceive and interpret. (Sometimes, supposedly, they also said the opposite of the truth in a way "obvious" enough that LKJ could later understand it.)

How about this? Flipping around the message of the C's, here and there and in various ways, gives a picture much closer to the truth about the C's, LKJ, her community and what it's all about. In fairly few flips, sometimes a stunningly accurate picture could emerge. This is the opposite of LKJ's view, accepted by her community, according to which the propaganda in the world (everything opposing their message) is often exactly the opposite of the truth.

There's many places you could begin, but I'll pick something I've already touched on, accuracy and "truth percentages".

Truth percentages and Bad statistics

Cassiopaean Session 1997-12-31 mentions truth percentages, and the following numbers have been provided for the (older) Cassiopaean material and for the (old published version of) the Ra material:

Ra: ~63%
C's: 71.7%

[...]

Here's something else, the C's on the message of the New Testament (from a compilation on the Cassiopaea forum):

941107
Q: (L) What is the origin of the name Appolyon?
A: Light being?
Q: (L) Why is Appolyon called the "destroyer" in Revelation?
A: Backward for sake of deception. Bible corrupted.
Q: (L) You have often stated that the Bible is corrupted, I would like to know who, exactly, corrupted the Bible and when and how they did this?
A: Illuminati brotherhood for a thousand earth years.
Q: (L) Does this mean that up until a thousand years ago the Bible was fairly accurate?
A: No.

Thousand year period is symbolic in the material for an era in 4D, or a metaphysically distinct "age" in the world.

Destroyers and light beings? The C's are said to be light beings. 6D STS are supposed to be their opposites and associated with black holes. Moving on...

Q: (L) Are any books of the New Testament written by who they claim to be written by?
A: No. Remember this is 70% propaganda.
Q: (L) Is 30% then the truth or the actual teachings?
A: Close. Enough you must decipher from instinct through meditation.

Now consider the 1997-12-31 session claim that the Cassiopaean material is 71.7% true. That fits a rounded 70%. The opposite would be 28.3% true, a fit for the rounded 30% which is "close" to being truth.

Sometimes I think the C's say the truth about their own stuff when giving answers about propaganda and deception in Christianity, the Bible, and more. And they also say Revelations is "corrupted" with messages of doom meant to inspire fear. (Note: I don't make any argument about Christianity etc. here, I leave that at the side. Personally though, I disbelieve both the C's and the Bible.)

You could go very far looking for "inversions". There's also a claim in the early Cassiopaean material that both sides have equal higher-density backing, and so there's ultimately supposedly a 6D STO vs. 6D STS thing going on.