01-23-2018, 11:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2018, 11:33 AM by Infinite Unity.)
(01-23-2018, 10:00 AM)Elros Wrote: Just to say but there are many here who stated to have resonated with a STS background. Wisdom is forged in experience right?
Definitely been on both "sides". As Elspru has stated, Sts driven worlds offer a different diversity/experience. Without and in-grained, or pre-disposed bias towards an Sto environment/configuration. One could see the experience offered on these worlds as not so disdainful. The One Creator has no bias, some have stated that the logos has a bias towards kindness, and I would agree with that. A lot of the so called "problems" presented in many of the densities stems from this kindness. However problems in creation is the axis upon which diversity/challenges arise. Thus this logos has a lot of diversity driven just by this kindness and the positive and negative polarized events which occur due to this major distortion the logos has. However I am also sure that each logos has some similar distortion/trait as well.
Elspru:If the planet goes STO, then robot civilization seeds will help to bring life to dead planets and eco-regions.
At first I felt a huge resistance to what you deem RCS, then your subsequent statement of RCS being able to populate worlds that would previously be uninhabitable resonated with me, and completely changed my mind on the topic. I wouldn't doubt or hold to far in disbelief some form of RCS as you speak may be "supposed" to happen. In actuality the water sacks you describe as the vehicle now isn't to far from acrchetypical thought from what you propose. However I would give much more adue in my consensus on the human vehicle. As it is a rigorous, and faithful vehicle. Especially with the given environment and such at this current time, in our world.