05-23-2019, 04:28 PM
(05-23-2019, 02:36 PM)anagogy Wrote:(05-23-2019, 02:36 PM)anagogy Wrote:(05-23-2019, 10:08 AM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: The problem with allowing alt-right ideology like Jordan Peterson,
If you, and others, believe that Jordan Peterson is alt right, it really does prove you have no clue what you're talking about.
"If i don't agree with someone, they are an alt right Nazi." Classic SJW logic.
(05-23-2019, 10:08 AM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: Also, his actual grasp on philosophy is extremely shallow.
Yeah, because yours is so much better. /rolleyes
(05-23-2019, 10:08 AM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: I've also spent more than 12 hours studying Jordan Peterson
Woah, a whole 12 hours? << sarcasm
More SJW logic:
Well, I think you are a great philosopher, and we have been debating together, here, for many years, and I respect your intellect in our discussions. To dismiss me as a person who is not thoughtful about philosophy seems a bit shortsighted, I have over 3,000 posts here talking primarily about philosophy, but I know the MO here is to go for the jugular. This is why I'm sad that you have defaulted to regurgitating some really tired and repetitive rhetoric and tactics. Where are the new ideas? Why did I know the second you entered the thread that you were a big fan of Jordan Peterson?
To be fair, I said, "more than twelve hours as well", which was the number hounsic gave when making a case to defend him. I don't know how many hours I've spent listening to JP or listening to counter arguments of his theories. It's more than a dozen. My point was that I'm not commenting flippantly, and I actually made a lot of points that I thought were well considered, but instead you got upset that I chose to bring up JP to point out the slippery slope of ideology, instead of actually choosing to try to defend any of his ideas.