05-23-2019, 05:08 PM
(05-23-2019, 04:55 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: I guess I would thought maybe you would defend why you think C-16 is an example of the government silencing free speech, when no one has actually be charged with violating it for over 2 years?
Or why Jordan Peterson use anti-speech laws himself to be litigious?
Well, one would also wonder if no one has been convicted of violating the law, *why* they ever had to pass a compelled speech law in the first place? It is a limitation on rights that any trans person can enact in any argument to try to silence ideological opponents at their convenience just because said opponent didn't want to use made up words invented by psychotic gender theorists who want to coopt the entire english language at the behest of less than 1% of the population. The fact that it hasn't been used yet means nothing. A bullet in an ideological gun hasn't shot someone yet, that's all that means.