09-09-2019, 07:45 AM
It seems to me that both sides share the same valid point, they're just approaching it from different directions: viz., this project loses polarization as it fails to accept all (see 25.6 in post #345 above), and it likewise loses purity as it becomes a vehicle for promoting solipsism and separation. I think all are best served through more thoughtful consideration of what service is being offered by each, that is, by asking, "Is what I'm offering carving out my own separate space, or am I working towards connectedness and general acceptance?" Perhaps we can agree on that one point?