(05-18-2022, 09:24 PM)mthloor Wrote: I created a website a few months ago to share my research about The Law of One, as well as surrounding or related material. The intention of it was to sort of create a portal or central repository of all my research online. The website includes Law of One-related links to other websites, as well as an explorable and searchable archive of my research. The website and website material seems like a continual work in progress.
Here is the link to the website:
Hey there mthloor, thanks for sharing.
It seems to me you're up front about what you're researching, summarized by what you said here.
Quote:Yes, the creator of this website hopes to show how others such as David Wilcock, Wynn Free, Dr. Andrija Puharich, Gene Roddenberry, Uri Geller, and others, might be either directly or indirectly interrelated with the Law of One information that was channeled by the L/L Research group, and how this may indirectly add to the validity of the Law of One information.
Definitely other folks have seen similar connections and tried to tie together different researches under the philosophy, so I see no issues with what you are working on here. I can see how it might be confusing to some, but it doesn't appear to me that you're trying to take any credit for L/L's work or anything.
There is a book called The Children of the Law of One & The Lost Teachings of Atlantis that is an interesting other look at the Law of One.
It's interesting you also note the Council of Nine and Andrija Puharich as I am quite fascinated with the The Book of Knowledge: Keys of Enoch by J.J. Hurtak whom also was apparently working with the Nine.
There is a very neat little table where Ra is mentioned as an intelligence that helps create worlds for 'testing the programs of the Father'. It is a peculiar but interesting book.
However, in its writing and expression, it is totally opposite of the Ra Material. It is full of jargon of specialized knowledge that is more or less opaque.
The Ra Material on the other hand is incredibly transparent, even if it has its own jargon as well.
Whereas Ra reveals the overall scheme, this kind of works seems to take a microscope to the idea of evolution of density and the transition from the current state to higher.
It does seem that in order to get the "whole picture", you have to combine multiple 'slants on the same information' as Ra might put it, so as to flesh out the thoughts.