06-11-2011, 02:54 AM
Certainly, however my point is simply that how can one "confirm" that they know something such as this? Even Ra himself states that we exist across numerous times, and we are in fact at every moment complete and in all densities however it is our focus or activation of this body which causes our perceptions to be limited. Also, this would also mean that Ra has existed through time and densities and there must be also some instance of Ra which already encompasses the entire octave. So rather, wouldn't there be multiple "instances" of Ra spread across time? These LOO teachings came from only one particular moment of Ra's state in 6th density, but it is quite likely that Ra's consciousness spans across multiple densities just as all of ours do.
Remember, it all comes back to principles. Forget about Ra as a person, it is more than a personality, this is very inherent in the societal memory complex. Rather, Ra embodies a principle of all giving light, the Sun. I, personally, believe Ra to be one name of our sub-Logos, in a manner. So really, when we consider Ra, we can actually consider it not only as simply this one instance of communication, but actually every point where the name Ra is associated. There is power in the name, although it is transient to Ra itself it is significant to us because it is an archetypal idea. Look at Ra as an archetype and I think you'll get what I mean.
Of course, you can imagine Ra as a "people", but its existence in time-space already quite eludes me from any 3D conception. We simply cannot use the same sense of visualization to try and achieve a concept of Ra's state.
Remember, it all comes back to principles. Forget about Ra as a person, it is more than a personality, this is very inherent in the societal memory complex. Rather, Ra embodies a principle of all giving light, the Sun. I, personally, believe Ra to be one name of our sub-Logos, in a manner. So really, when we consider Ra, we can actually consider it not only as simply this one instance of communication, but actually every point where the name Ra is associated. There is power in the name, although it is transient to Ra itself it is significant to us because it is an archetypal idea. Look at Ra as an archetype and I think you'll get what I mean.
Of course, you can imagine Ra as a "people", but its existence in time-space already quite eludes me from any 3D conception. We simply cannot use the same sense of visualization to try and achieve a concept of Ra's state.