08-07-2021, 07:29 PM
One other thing I would mention here is that it is well to acknowledge one's shadow with love, in whatever mirror it may chance to appear to one. Q'uo often repeats that our job here is to love the unlovable and accept the unacceptable.
In this instance, we could simply accept that one such as this has come to visit to see what is here for it to exchange its energies with. And, indeed, its time has not been wasted in that regard. However, were this a channeling session run by Carla L. Rueckert McCarty, she would very quickly thank the negatively oriented being for its service and then banish it from the place of working. Why? Because the intent of such is to disrupt or divert the working. But what if there really is no such working going on? Does such a rule apply then? This feature complicates the situation, I would observe.
To me, our friend does us a service by pointing out that this website is largely a social klatsch, not a quasi-sacred space for spiritual study and support. Were the site abounding in dedicated positive energy, methinks a response such as Carla would have delivered would be swift. (She was particularly sensitive, given her history, to negative infringement in a sacred space.)
And so, what we have now is a tad noisy and muddled, but not irretrievable, I would say. With some resolute leadership, things might improve. I would say that the instrument of these forums needs to be overhauled so as to be something closer to a beacon of light in service to the one Creatrix rather than mainly a spot to display partially polarised, largely randomised chatter. One obvious advantage to this would be greater clarity of understanding and action in the face of the odd visit from the "loyal opposition."
May all beings be happy.
May all beings find peace.
May all beings find peace.