(05-23-2019, 04:28 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: This is why I'm sad that you have defaulted to regurgitating some really tired and repetitive rhetoric and tactics.
You mean sort of like how you are doing the exact same thing, misrepresenting centrists like Jordan Peterson as "alt right" or "intro to alt right"?
(05-23-2019, 04:28 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: Where are the new ideas? Why did I know the second you entered the thread that you were a big fan of Jordan Peterson?
Maybe because I'm a fan of common sense?
(05-23-2019, 04:28 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: To be fair, I said, "more than twelve hours as well", which was the number hounsic gave when making a case to defend him. I don't know how many hours I've spent listening to JP or listening to counter arguments of his theories. It's more than a dozen. My point was that I'm not commenting flippantly, and I actually made a lot of points that I thought were well considered, but instead you got upset that I chose to bring up JP to point out the slippery slope of ideology, instead of actually choosing to try to defend any of his ideas.
What idea would you like me to defend? Jordan's idea of feminine chaos? You know that isn't a new idea right? That pops up in a lot of cultures. Especially in kabbalah. It isn't calling feminine "dirty" like you misrepresented. Chaos is also creativity. And why do you think his grasp of philosophy is "shallow" what terms do you think he is misrepresenting? Because I think you are misrepresenting things more than he is.
Good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.