(11-30-2019, 01:23 AM)RitaJC Wrote: As I see it, what's described here doesn't deserve the name of God/Logos.I see you missing the point.
And it has nothing to do with reality, it's just a story believed and mirrored back by the experience.
If that is what you WANT to continue experiencing, by all means.
If you are ready to discover the TRUTH by starting to question your own beliefs, let's talk.
If the creator chose separation...then let's part of itself coerce other parts into worshipping them, in place of realizing this fact, it's an indifferent God.
Ra states that all is one...so separation is a path to God.
If all the other parts choose to remain separate...chasing unity is a frivolous task that can only end in disappointment.
Ra tells us to be void of expectation, yet preaches levels of unity of a perfect creation...its not perfect and is offering an inadvertent bias, by suggesting its beneficial.
Why would it be beneficial...when separation was it's own choice?
It seems counterproductive to be teaching unity...when we're here to experience separation.
Perhaps the path to true graduation...is negative.
Then flip when you realize all is one...otherwise you're setting yourself up for endless cycles of disappointment.
Why not just be separate, learn it n then reconnect?
It seems like a stupid thing to want to feel connected in a place born to feel the opposite.
When I'm balanced...the cycles happen.
When I'm out of balance...same thing.
What's the point in choosing the hard path of balance, over separation...when the logos wants it separate. Why else did it choose it?
And btw...which part of the creation that I described...isn't the logos or God?
Considering I am that.
I'd like to know what qualifies as logos, in your opinion?
What belief would you say I haven't questioned?
Why do you think I'm putting this here?
I'd say I'm more than willing to question mine.
Can you say the same?
Thanks for leaving the door open for when I come back to the "helpable zone" though, I appreciate the open helping hand.