02-20-2021, 09:25 AM
(02-20-2021, 03:57 AM)LeiwoUnion Wrote:(02-19-2021, 11:26 PM)Patrick Wrote: I get the reasoning behind the question of what happens with the broken down strands. Here is an article that made it clearer for me.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/ar...eir-lipids
This is all fine and dandy scientific sales pitch material which takes into account only the things that have been 'verified' (this makes me laugh these days) by experiments...
What is the alternative then ? You are basically saying that biology science is in part based on faith? If so, I agree. There are so many drugs approved for use where it is stated that the underlying mechanism of action is unknown.
I would prefer we had pyramid healing, crystal healing and plant based wonder medications. But sadly that is not the road our collective societies took. We chose the mechanical view of the body and based all our "tech" on that. This is what we have to work with at this time.
When it comes to faith based decisions. If I have a choice in between what a stranger says on youtube and perusing data for myself. I prefer the latter.
The end result might all be the same. It's all based on faith. I just have more faith in the scientific process it seems. Experiments can be replicated by others as well, which makes it harder to maintain a bias in the data.
So what are those against vaccination proposing ? What is the better solution ?