04-27-2021, 03:23 PM
(04-27-2021, 02:26 PM)Ymarsakar Wrote: "What method of raising awareness am I discarding?"
You call it conspiration. Conspiracism and conspiracy
I see.
We could say that conspiracy theories are the content and not the method. The method here is still information sharing. It's the same thing I am doing. It's the focus of the content that is different.
The issue I have with the content of many CTs at the moment is that they purport to Earthly happenings while having no supporting evidence. When we talk about spiritual concepts it is expected to be a faith based matter. But when we discuss things happening in consensus reality, we can protect ourselves from manipulation from STS by expecting evidence. Otherwise STS is just having a field day within the CT circles.
Real CTs have evidence provided by whistleblowers. Not even mainstream news can block that type of information from waking up people.
(04-27-2021, 02:26 PM)Ymarsakar Wrote: "You seem to subscribe to the popular view of what science is (which is not the actual definition that the majority of scientists use). "
I utilize the original scientific method and your described method is the popular view of what science now is.
That's just the beginning of the problems you talk about but do not pinpoint or are aware of.
I can only agree to disagree on those statements.
Interesting info over there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of...fic_method
But really, without agreeing on the base semantics there is no hope of understanding.
(04-27-2021, 02:26 PM)Ymarsakar Wrote: "That is to say that science can never ever prove anything whatsoever. It can only disprove hypotheses."
Something that cannot prove something, also cannot disprove something. That is simple logic.
There is data, hypothesis, and that's about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability