06-19-2021, 07:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-19-2021, 07:35 PM by LeiwoUnion.)
(06-19-2021, 06:44 PM)ada Wrote: You have person A, a sensitive entity.
Person B spreads "information" that the covid vaccine makes your arm magnetic claiming it's a colaborated plan by the goverments or whatnot to implament a nano microchip into the whole population, meaning the virus itself is also planned out.
Person A, being sensitive or mentally unstable, takes these thoughts and becomes very fearful, becomes untrustful of everyone around, perhaps they've already taken the vaccine and now they are terrified that they are microchipped and are being enslaved, add panic unto that and it's quite likely they might harm themselves or others.
How exactly did you help person A? What good, what positivity have you brought to them?
What benefit does this uncertain physical fear brings about to an entity to help them progress spiritually? Do you really not understand the core problem in this?
This is absurd. You can't escape responsibility like that. Look how many members are saying over and over "this feels fear mongering". Yet you remain in denial, not your fault, it's not really fearful, just sharing harmful information.. Wake up.
This may sound harsh, but someone has to say it.
If you really want to help, then take this information and research it's theisis. Is it true? Is it proven? What do the other sources say about this? Scientists? Was there research done? Where was this first claimed/published? Was it a social media video? Is it trust worthy to go about and tell people that they are being lied to and enslaved by taking a vaccine that might otherwise help them/others?
I wonder, if you did all those things yourself?
However, what if in the scenario you presented the information lead to the proposed downfall of the person A, but lead to an insight moment for persons B, C and D where they find their Love and calling, their mission where they start putting their volition into the betterment of the world, and in 20 years they lead the world as a peaceful 3-4D council with Love and Light as their vision and purpose; loved by all. Was this a desirable scenario; where's the line that tells something is a desirable action or not? Was it even in any way predictable? Maybe the initial intention was to help with the awakening of these three persons while also providing the catalyst and experience of paranoia upon the first person; all according to the plans? The point is that the whole argument about 'happenings' within these infinite timelines and 3D illusions is absurd in itself. Any focus out of the self is delusion, All is self. You made the decision to have a paranoid incarnation here as a person A. Similarly you made the decision of doing the same as persons B, C and D. The point of view differs, where the responsibility is narrowed to one shard of the One Infinite Creator on this level. It does not take away from the fact that you made the decisions on the other side too, times infinite in potentiation. You cannot take responsibility away from the choices of the illusory others or it will turn into infringement; this is the first responsibility you-we-all have upon ourself; the first distortion. What is left, is the reaction we choose to have with our limited point of view regarding the catalyst presented to us. Ravings about 'wrongs and rights' or 'lies and truths' are essentially fruitless distractions people use most of the time just to amuse themselves and avoid polarization. You say 'wake up' like you know what is going on, yet it is not any different than someone saying 'wake up' to people not listening this magnetics issue, or even further people not listening that the Earth must be flat.