Earth is Wobbling

[AnthroHeart]

This is fascinating.
I have also felt my energy field wobble before.
I think it's one cause of why the energies feel so intense.
I believe it's related to the ascension, and transformation of our bodies into crystaline.

[jafar]

Ladies and gentlemen this is your captain speaking.
We are now crossing a zone of turbulence and we would like everyone to remain seated.
Please remain calm and make sure that your seat belt is fastened. Thank you.

[Glow]

I’m always so amazed listening to people explain this.
I get it but never would have obviously had the mind to discover or research this stuff.
So very cool.

https://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthre...?tid=18779

The wobble isn’t new phenomenon, so not assension related in that sense, we just didn’t know.
Zedro and Aion were talking about it in the thread above.

You might enjoy the input they shared.
I found it facinating, hope you enjoy it too.

[zedro]

I’m always so amazed listening to people explain this.
I get it but never would have obviously had the mind to discover or research this stuff.
So very cool.

https://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthre...?tid=18779

The wobble isn’t new phenomenon, so not assension related in that sense, we just didn’t know.
Zedro and Aion were talking about it in the thread above.

You might enjoy the input they shared.
I found it facinating, hope you enjoy it too.

The precession wobble we previously described is a different phenomena from what he is describing, the former being a long term cosmological mechanic that is actually Ascension related (it's part of the 25ish thousand year cycle Ra describes, where we are at the end of the 3rd cycle). What that above video is describing is of a much higher frequency and is a local planetary amplitude, not our solar system. Although they call it gravitational effects (according to scientific orthodoxy), the truth is electromagnetic (the true elemental force that orthodox science mistakes as gravity, a hypothetical concept). Now I have no idea as to why, is this phenomena something that has always existed, what is the cause, etc, but any type of vibration on this scale represents a massive amount of energy, either receiving or transmitting.

There is a great theory on the precession mechanic, where our solar system is rotating (so think of a wine wave) and every 25 thousand years it peaks across the galaxy spiral plane, putting us into the most direct path with the central sun, and thus the highest energy state.

[Glow]

Another wobble. That just makes it more amazing.
I am going to have to reread and rewatch both wobble videos/threads now.

It’s interesting to think about how different our brains are that you and others can fully understand this stuff.
Amazing.

Truely incredible stuff. Thanks for making it a tiny bit more clear.

[jafar]

In Sanskrit the word to refer to what is know known as 'fabric of space and time' is 'akash'.
The ancient perceive the Akash as if it's a 'water pervading everything in the cosmos'.
Everything moves around in the akash, just like fishes inside the water.
The akash itself is not 'static', just like water it can move around and wave does occur inside the akash.

Today, through 'different observation path', scientist has discovered similar things, yet they named it differently, 'gravitational field'. Everything move around inside the 'gravitational field', and the field itself is not static, there's ripples and wave inside, thus the term 'gravitational wave' was born which now it's existence has been confirmed through findings made by LIGO.
When there's a wave then the properties is defined as frequency (how fast the period between cycle) and amplitude (how strong).

Galaxy moves within the 'field', the sun moves around the galaxy and this planet moves around the sun.
Thus everything moves around within the 'field', including this planet.
Because everything moves around, in order to see how this planet move we need to have a 'beacon' as a benchmark, like an ancient sailor trying to discern his position in relation to a lighthouse.

The paper / video above explain the current 'hypothesis' when we use 45 pulsars as the 'beacon'.
In relative to those 45 pulsars it seems that we're 'wobbling'.
The amplitude is mentioned to be around 30 meters, although the video did not mentioned anything about the frequency it only mentioned the the difference in period is at 'hundred of nanosecond' scale in comparison to 13 years ago.

Using the metaphor of sailor, based on the sailor measurement by observing the lighthouse, he hypothesize that the ocean wave that rock his ship is increasing compared to 13 years ago, the frequency is hundred of nanosecond faster and currently the ocean wave is at 30 meters high. It can be because the ship has moved to different location where the ocean current is stronger or the ship do not move at all but there's a new current that is affecting the ocean around his ship, or combination of both.

[Glow]

Jafar I’m going to have to read that about 7 times but I enjoyed it so far so thank you for sharing.

I grasped some but will understand it more each go through.

I love science but you guys have amazing brains, it makes me grateful to see this expression of the creator. I can’t really put it into words but thank you all for explaining things enough so I can on my tippy toes peek through your eyes. Just a glimpse but it’s fascinating and it’s a gift.

[flofrog]

In Sanskrit the word to refer to what is know known as 'fabric of space and time' is 'akash'.
The ancient perceive the Akash as if it's a 'water pervading everything in the cosmos'.
Everything moves around in the akash, just like fishes inside the water.
The akash itself is not 'static', just like water it can move around and wave does occur inside the akash.

I always thought that Kubrick in 2001 Space Odyssey had been so inspired to use the Blue Danube waltz in the sequence where we see the ship flying in the night , not that the blue danube is my favorite

[jafar]

Glow, Flofrog you're welcomed..

Sometimes 'scientist' uses complicated 'buzzword' which makes it harder to understand.

Well the same goes to Mr. Ra, 'distortion', 'mind sprit body complex', 'polarity' my head hurts when I first encounter those words.. LoL

Expanding a bit on this topic.

For some, hearing the term 'akash' will trigger another 'more popular' buzzword 'akeshic record'.
The ancient also knew that the 'akash' functioned as 'data storage', they imagine it like a 'scroll' where it keeps record of everything that has happened, thus the term 'akeshic record' was mentioned. This in turn lead them to think that this cosmos is actually a 'maiya', a sanskrit word for 'illusion'.

Current physicist also think in the same manner.

While probing on the 'nature' on the black hole, they found out that the 'black hole' is a giant sucker of this 'gravitational field'. Like a drain in the kitchen sink sucking all water around it. The question arises when 'things' fell into the hole, what's left of it? Some physicist found out that what remain is the 'information'. Hence it give birth on the 'temporarily' nature of 'things' as what will stay will only be the 'information'. This give birth to another hypothesis of "Holographic universe", this universe is merely a hologram.

However finding empirical evidence for this at the moment is beyond the current technology.
Leonard Susskind is one of the proponent of such theory, and here he explained on how he arrived at such conclusion.
https://www.cornell.edu/video/leonard-su...-principle

And here's the recording (from youtube not from the akeshic record... lol) of the discussion on the idea that 'we're living inside a gigantic computer simulation'.
https://youtu.be/wgSZA3NPpBs

[Ming the Merciful]

Glow, Flofrog you're welcomed..

Sometimes 'scientist' uses complicated 'buzzword' which makes it harder to understand.

Well the same goes to Mr. Ra, 'distortion', 'mind sprit body complex', 'polarity' my head hurts when I first encounter those words.. LoL

Expanding a bit on this topic.

For some, hearing the term 'akash' will trigger another 'more popular' buzzword 'akeshic record'.
The ancient also knew that the 'akash' functioned as 'data storage', they imagine it like a 'scroll' where it keeps record of everything that has happened, thus the term 'akeshic record' was mentioned. This in turn lead them to think that this cosmos is actually a 'maiya', a sanskrit word for 'illusion'.

Current physicist also think in the same manner.

While probing on the 'nature' on the black hole, they found out that the 'black hole' is a giant sucker of this 'gravitational field'. Like a drain in the kitchen sink sucking all water around it. The question arises when 'things' fell into the hole, what's left of it? Some physicist found out that what remain is the 'information'. Hence it give birth on the 'temporarily' nature of 'things' as what will stay will only be the 'information'. This give birth to another hypothesis of "Holographic universe", this universe is merely a hologram.

However finding empirical evidence for this at the moment is beyond the current technology.
Leonard Susskind is one of the proponent of such theory, and here he explained on how he arrived at such conclusion.
https://www.cornell.edu/video/leonard-su...-principle

And here's the recording (from youtube not from the akeshic record... lol) of the discussion on the idea that 'we're living inside a gigantic computer simulation'.
https://youtu.be/wgSZA3NPpBs

I watched another interesting video on YouTube that asked, if we live in a simulation, are we living in the "Base Simulation", (or), a "Simulation within a Simulation"? The theory suggested, was that if there was a Base Simulation, (the beginning). The people within the Simulation would evolve, creating their own Simulations, (current level of graphics in computer games). So, are we first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth , and so on, level of Simulation? The aforementioned "Computer Games"? Are we not the "God(s)" of a simulation, when we create lifeforms in a "Game Simulator". The perfect example, is the game "Sims". We have given them character, personality, choice? It is all based on "Artificial Intelligence"? Are we also based on "Artificial Intelligence", (given to us from someone, (or something)), at a higher level of development than ourselves. So, the "God(s) are creating the God(s)". Perhaps into infinity? It is the same illusion, (delusion), manufactured by a Higher Level of Consciousness, and who knows where it will end.

Then a few days ago I watched, (yet), another video that put forward the suggestion that it is "Black Holes" that create Universes. At the point where the something reaches the Paradox and the final point between Space-Time, at the infinite point between Realities new Universes are created.

[flofrog]

Xactly Ming, I remember a really funny passage a long time ago in Conversations with God where Creatrix said roughly ‘ it’s the black holes that are interesting energy, children... ‘