Intelligent Infinity Defined

[Anders]

Everything as relations is similar, or perhaps even the same, as the concept of emptiness in Buddhism. I did a quick search to see if I could find a simple explanation of emptiness in Buddhism and only found very advanced, complicated or vague explanations.

Instead I found that Morgue has a simple theory about how reality is based on nothingness (void):

In a similar way I start with reality as the difference between everything and nothing. Maybe Morgue's theory is better because it starts with only nothing. I will look into the ontological math he uses later. Meanwhile the difference between everything and nothing can be used for the concept of emptiness, because that difference is a relation! And as I described in previous posts, that single relation results in an endless expansion of relations.

Ra in the Law of One uses the term plenum instead of void:

"Questioner: That’s what I thought you might say. Am I correct in assuming that at the beginning of this octave, out of what I would call a void of space, the seeds of an infinite number of galactic systems such as the Milky Way Galaxy appeared and grew in spiral fashion simultaneously?

Ra: I am Ra. There are duple areas of potential confusion. Firstly, let us say that the basic concept is reasonably well-stated. Now we address the confusion. The nature of true simultaneity is such that, indeed, all is simultaneous. However, in your modes of perception you would perhaps more properly view the seeding of the creation as that of growth from the center or core outward. The second confusion lies in the term, ‘void’. We would substitute the noun, ‘plenum’." - Law of One 82.6