09-01-2021, 02:19 AM
We can see evidence of Intelligent Infinity simply by observing how physical reality works. The current scientific view seems way too mechanistic as an explanation of the larger cohesive picture. And I noticed in the previous quote from Ra I posted that the name Larson was mentioned. And I found:
And indeed, I found this video with a lecture by Dewey B. Larson where he talks about how he found through studying the periodic table that atoms are better explained by motions than by subatomic particles! And Larson also talked about flaws in the current (at the time, they haven't changed much since) theories in science. My interpretation is that science still is way too clunky, limited and perhaps even very much wrong about many things, to explain or try to explain away Intelligent Infinity.
Quote:"20.6 Questioner: Speaking of the rapid change that occurred in the physical vehicle; the change from second to third density: this, you said, occurred in approximately a generation and a half. Body hair was lost and there were structural changes.
I am aware of the physics of Dewey B. Larson, who states that all is motion or vibration. Am I correct in assuming that the basic vibration, which makes up the physical world as we experience it, changes, thus creating a different set of parameters, shall I say, in this short period of time between density changes allowing for the new type of vehicle? Am I correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
20.7 Questioner: Just as a sideline, a side question here: Is the physics of Dewey Larson correct?
Ra: I am Ra. The physics of sound vibrational complex Dewey is a correct system as far as it is able to go. There are those things which are not included in this system. However, those coming after this particular entity, using the basic concepts of vibration and the study of vibrational distortions, will begin to understand that which you know of as gravity and those things you consider as “n” dimensions. These things are necessary to be included in a more universal, shall we say, physical theory." - Law of One 20:6-7
And indeed, I found this video with a lecture by Dewey B. Larson where he talks about how he found through studying the periodic table that atoms are better explained by motions than by subatomic particles! And Larson also talked about flaws in the current (at the time, they haven't changed much since) theories in science. My interpretation is that science still is way too clunky, limited and perhaps even very much wrong about many things, to explain or try to explain away Intelligent Infinity.