07-20-2021, 12:58 AM
(07-19-2021, 06:16 PM)Ming the Merciful Wrote: Since I joined the "Law of One" I still see too much Intellectualism, (or), everybody should try another approach to understanding what it is all about. My conjecture is, has anyone ever considered not thinking about the "Law of One" intellectually, but understanding by not understanding. That is a contradiction. No it is not, (and yes it is). Everything is a contradiction. When you are studying the L/L material, have you ever considered not reading and allowing the Knowledge to flow into you, (in No Mind). The moment that we allow ourselves to become a part of the "Natural Order of Everything". By not understanding, and reflecting on the material in Still Mind, then you will understand without understanding. I am basing this from Zen and approaching it differently.
Law of One / unity is so easy to comprehend, that it doesn't need any 'intellectuality'.
All things are one, there is only identity.
The mind can only recognize things when it's shown as a contrast/contradiction.
As through contrast/contradiction the mind can define a border between something and not something.
Through contrast/contradiction the identity shall learn.
The opposite/contrast/contradiction of oneness / unity is many-ness / separation.
The more no-thing one become, the wall / border of identification will become thinner.
The thinner the wall / border of identification, the more every-thing one shall become.
When jafar is silence then it's jafar's higher self that is experiencing.
When jafar's higher self is silence then it's jafar's higher higher self that is experiencing.
And so on..
Becoming no-thing (thus every-thing) by itself is an evolutionary process, every identities is at it's own stage. Thus there is no 'standard' of too much or too little identification, thus too much or too little 'intellectuality'.
Just like a child evolves into teenage, adult and elderly.. let every identities evolves naturally at it's own phase.