08-18-2021, 04:58 PM
(08-18-2021, 04:22 PM)Anders Wrote: @Ming the Merciful Yes, I have listened a lot to Mooji. I find him similar to Eckhart Tolle in terms of nonduality.
Ra also basically teaches nonduality, such as:
Quote:"Questioner: [The question was lost because the questioner was sitting too far from the tape recorder to be recorded.]
Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that the universe is infinite. This has yet to be proven or disproven, but we can assure you that there is no end to your selves, your understanding, what you would call your journey of seeking, or your perceptions of the creation.
That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an Infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity.
In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One.
May we enunciate this law in more detail?" - Law of One 1.7
Thank you Anders, what a quotation. Not only is it Law of One, it is pure Zen. On the other hand, since i discovered the "Law of One", I simply thought that it was another sheep wearing a new set of clothes. It is the same, (and identical). Zen has the same connotations. Are they both not Universal? Trying to explain Zen, is no different than explaining Law of One. On a basic level we can understand. It is like a child in kindergarten trying to comprehend String Theory or Dark Matter and Dark Energy. They do not have the capacity to do it because it is beyond anything they comprehend. Once we accept the pure "Oneness", then everything, (naturally), falls into place.
In Zen there is the symbology of the Yin-Yang symbol. When it is folded in half, and onto itself, opposites no longer exist and are destroyed. The destruction. Simultaneously, it is also recreation in the moment. Existing and not existing simultaneously. The Law of One is the same, in the effect of the Veil. The Veil exists and does not exist simultaneously. Once we cross the divide, we have crossed the Veil, (in the context of Unity). The all-encompassing Oneness and Nothingness. The Zen of no Zen.