Yes, Azrael, I've had experiences like that, the sacred experiences that I do not question. However, 111 stated that he likes these questions, thus I am asking them because I am curious and interested in his opinions.
I think also that the confusion we seem to experience involves two topics of discussion being mixed. One topic is the nature of Ra. Another topic is the appearance or contact with the attached "picture" of Ra, made by Ra.
The first topic - although, I can listen to different interpretations of Ra and find them interesting, I don't have anything to contribute with myself, since my belief is that to know exactly the nature of Ra you have to have the access of the same level, and be on that same level. That level is 6D, and certainly not 3D.
It is the second topic that I find interesting. It is stated in the material that Ra do contact us, in order to impress the philosophy, in 24.5 and 24.6:
Now, I don't understand Ra's later answer, that is perhaps to the fact that this answer was personal to Don, thus only he can understand it. But I might be mistaken here.
Thank you! Ah sometimes it does feel frustrating to communicate, but I hope that you can bear with me a little while longer.
How did Ra looked, appeared, to you? How was it done, was it done in dreams, meditations etc? Were you still in your body, or was it in astral plane/s?
I think also that the confusion we seem to experience involves two topics of discussion being mixed. One topic is the nature of Ra. Another topic is the appearance or contact with the attached "picture" of Ra, made by Ra.
The first topic - although, I can listen to different interpretations of Ra and find them interesting, I don't have anything to contribute with myself, since my belief is that to know exactly the nature of Ra you have to have the access of the same level, and be on that same level. That level is 6D, and certainly not 3D.
It is the second topic that I find interesting. It is stated in the material that Ra do contact us, in order to impress the philosophy, in 24.5 and 24.6:
RA Wrote:The other method used to greater effect later in the scenario, as you would call it, was the thought-form such as we often use among your peoples to suggest the mysterious or the sublime. You may be familiar with some of these appearances.
24.6 Questioner: Could you state some of those?
Ra: I am Ra. This is information which you may discover. However, we will briefly point the way by indicating the so-called wheel within a wheel and the cherubim with sleepless eye.
Now, I don't understand Ra's later answer, that is perhaps to the fact that this answer was personal to Don, thus only he can understand it. But I might be mistaken here.
(06-11-2011, 03:37 AM)111 Wrote: In my recollection I said that I was in contact with the being "Ra", in hindsight and understanding I realize this to be a true and confusing statement.... You asked how IKNOW this to be the same being? I don't, but in faith I understand what I meant for myself to understand. There is no explanation for where this knowledge comes from. And no proof to validate what I believe. But I knowWhy wouldn't you equate the the being Ra (who has brought clarity into your exsistence) to theidea of clarity. The original idea of seeking? They are hand n hand in my mind!! I love both of your belifs!! And my own
Thank you! Ah sometimes it does feel frustrating to communicate, but I hope that you can bear with me a little while longer.
How did Ra looked, appeared, to you? How was it done, was it done in dreams, meditations etc? Were you still in your body, or was it in astral plane/s?
_______________________
...gaze then at the stunning mystery of the One...
...gaze then at the stunning mystery of the One...