11-23-2012, 08:10 PM
Wouldn't it be possible, that even the slightest shift towards more people in higher sub-densities help to shift those in the lower sub-densities? Kind of like an 'isomorphic change'?
As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.
You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022)
x
11-23-2012, 08:10 PM
Wouldn't it be possible, that even the slightest shift towards more people in higher sub-densities help to shift those in the lower sub-densities? Kind of like an 'isomorphic change'?
11-23-2012, 08:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-23-2012, 08:38 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(11-23-2012, 08:10 PM)rie Wrote: Wouldn't it be possible, that even the slightest shift towards more people in higher sub-densities help to shift those in the lower sub-densities? Kind of like an 'isomorphic change'? I dunno. All things are possible at the micro level. So even if we know how it all theoretically worked, there is no reason to believe that our experience of it will be "normal." The normal graph has many limitations, and the curve need not look like that at all. But the thing which I found most striking upon pondering it was noticing the possibility of a magnitudinal shift even as the "masses" lag significantly behind.
11-23-2012, 08:49 PM
(11-23-2012, 08:10 PM)rie Wrote: Wouldn't it be possible, that even the slightest shift towards more people in higher sub-densities help to shift those in the lower sub-densities? Kind of like an 'isomorphic change'?What more being 'at' a certain sub-density does is to provide more opportunity to access that particular sub-density, because they are offering yet another expression of that vibration which may resonate more with the unique current conditions of an individual at the prior sub-density.
11-23-2012, 09:35 PM
(11-23-2012, 07:57 PM)Oceania Wrote: lol Christine your av cracks me up hehehehehehehe .....thx u...... cracked me up too .....do u think hed appreciate it....hahaha Ummmmm did u really take Ra or are u screwing with me...hehehe
11-23-2012, 10:18 PM
The normal curve could be one way to look at things... but 'Bell Curve' has specific meaning, which is rather controversial re: race & intelligence, etc.,.
11-24-2012, 02:25 AM
Bell curve, as a term, is controversial?
11-24-2012, 04:43 AM
i dunno the curve looked like a bell.
yes Christine i took Ra as does everyone who reads LOO
Bell Curve: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve
Normal Curve (or distribution): It is called a 'bell curve' but usually referred to as normal distribution... it won't matter so much what you call but the 'study' has taken that phrase to another dimension.
11-24-2012, 07:37 AM
(11-24-2012, 04:43 AM)Oceania Wrote: i dunno the curve looked like a bell. O ummmmm.....Im a douchebag .......hahahaha I was kinda excited .....thinking "AWESOME MAYBE ITS A CLASS FOR DUMMYS , IAM SOOOOO TAKING IT!!!" hehehehe Thanks for clearing that up for me before I started asking around about the Ra classes!!
11-24-2012, 08:06 AM
lol i dunno, i think just reading LOO is a class in itself, along with discussion with friends. its interpretation seems unique to people so we have endless discussions.
(11-21-2012, 11:52 AM)hogey11 Wrote: But I don't feel it's as cut and dry as we make it.Then why do you keep trying to make it cut and dry? (11-21-2012, 02:30 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:It's the same idea but in the more limited context. Veil still exists due to mind/body complex regardless of vibratory rate. As a resource of mind, only the last subdensity can begin to appreciate the lower subdensities of 3D. Until then, not enough experience has been distilled and the individual's distortions are preventing them from accepting themselves sufficiently.(11-17-2012, 02:15 PM)zenmaster Wrote: My understanding is that more attaining 5SD simply means more opportunity to express "5SD vibratory rates". Because each in that subdensity, in addition to drawing from the vibration as a resource of mind, would be contributing some pioneering aspect of themselves due to their necessary uniqueness. Quote:Then why do you keep trying to make it cut and dry? I don't feel I am. I am considering all possibilities right now, from spaceships on lawns, to alien fungi, to aliens incarnating as humans and changing it from within, to just mere spectators until we get our s*** sorted out ourselves. I said 'cut and dry' in response to these ideas that disclosure could not be attained without interfering with the law of free will; I feel there may be ways around that.
11-25-2012, 10:16 AM
(11-17-2012, 02:15 PM)zenmaster Wrote:Yes!(11-13-2012, 04:24 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:Yes, however the wanderer brings 'everything' regardless of the local polarizing conditions. The wanderer would have less opportunities, statistically, for access and expression with less mass "at" a particular SD (if they incarnated randomly). Also the constraints provided at the lower subdensities are appropriate for those subdensities.(11-12-2012, 09:36 PM)zenmaster Wrote: My understanding is that more attaining 5SD simply means more opportunity to express "5SD vibratory rates". Because each in that subdensity, in addition to drawing from the vibration as a resource of mind, would be contributing some pioneering aspect of themselves due to their necessary uniqueness. |
|