(12-29-2012, 12:58 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: The more interesting, and relevant, question in my mind is to elucidate the tenuous link between David Wilcock's concept of "ascension" and what was actually said in the Ra material. There seems to be a big question mark as to how this link was made, and why it was never openly refuted by L/L Research.
What kind of open refutation are you thinking of?
(12-29-2012, 12:58 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: As near as I can discern, more details on the nature of the relationship between L/L and DW circa 1996 when the "spinoff" into Ascension2000.com occurred may shed some light on how such a distorted interpretation of the Ra Material became injected into the mass consciousness. However, it also appears that, for personal reasons, this information is "off limits" for public consumption.
Did Carla and Jim know David in 1996?