The Harvest that didn't happen?

[Tenet Nosce]

What kind of open refutation are you thinking of?

It could have taken many forms- and maybe it did and I just don't know about it. But all it would require is a statement that certain ideas that were being promoted as having a basis in the Ra Material, did not in fact have such a basis.

The Ra material talks about harvest. It talks about the 30-year period after 1981, following which the "inconveniences" would cease and the "quantum leap" would occur.

Some of these ideas were incorporated into the notion of "ascension." This, in itself, is fine. What isn't fine is wherein certain ideas that were not present in the Ra Material were attributed to it.

Again- L/L may have made the distinction clear, and I am just not aware of it. But I am thinking of the perspective of those who come to the Ra Material, having taken at face value that it says certain things which it does not.

As near as I can discern, more details on the nature of the relationship between L/L and DW circa 1996 when the "spinoff" into Ascension2000.com occurred may shed some light on how such a distorted interpretation of the Ra Material became injected into the mass consciousness. However, it also appears that, for personal reasons, this information is "off limits" for public consumption.

Did Carla and Jim know David in 1996?

I think so..? Maybe they didn't, but he was talking about the Ra Material back in 1996, perhaps he didn't actually meet Carla and Jim until later. This is from a 2006 post from DW:


http://divinecosmos.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-8398.html

any researcher trying to draw comparisons between my life and those of the Law of One team, be advised... i was the first person to live in don elkins' room after he committed suicide, nearly 20 years later. i pick up all the energies off of the areas i sleep in whether i want to or not. i slept on the "ra bed" that the original Law of One readings were done off of for the first month i was there. all the frozen suicide thoughtforms in don's room greeted me very strongly - the second or third night i slept in there i had a terrifying dream where gov. spooks shot my head off and i was in my astral body, trying to move my arms to feel if i still had a head. i didn't even take don's original decorations off the wall and repaint to claim the room as my own until a month into the process.

If he slept in the room 20 years later... then I guess the experience discussed here happened circa 2004. So maybe he didn't know them before that.

---

I am not sure there is a 'false prophecy' here except by those who blatantly claimed we'd "ascend" on December 21st, 2012.

That is, itself, the false prophecy. Along with all the other things that were supposed to happen along with "ascension." Backing away from a false prophecy does not abrogate responsibility for issuing it in the first place.

What you said was: There was no false prophecy, except for the false prophecy. What does that even mean?

People expected a 'shift' because we need one

People (including myself) expected a "shift" because they were too lazy or unwilling to do the work themselves. Or perhaps because once it was seen how much work really needed to be done, it appeared overwhelming and impossible.

Later on, some of us realized that the shift is something that happens through us, not to us. And so we began the slow, uncomfortable, and painstaking work of removing the inner obstacles to such a shift. Others took it as an excuse to continue to be lazy and not do the inner work, and expecting something else (the photon belt, ascension, Nibiru, Elenin, aliens, lightworkers, etc.) to do the work for them.

Thus far, it would appear that those who have decided to do the inner work are still doing inner work, while those who have decided NOT to do the inner work, are still NOT doing it.

If anything has indeed shifted, it is such that doing the inner work will be easier for those who are willing to make a continuous effort to grow in consciousness. For those who make no such efforts, any such shift is only theoretical and has no practical value.