01-27-2018, 01:16 PM
If I may.
That is a big wall of text, it might be less intimidating to read with a few more paragraph breaks
I got about 1/4th the way through the first block before I started rereading the same line which led me to lose my train of focus.
As someone who's been hit with 'tl;dr' (too long didn't read), I don't want your time spent on making this post to be somehow a waste because it was to long for anyone to fully read.
I suggest making an outline of the structure of your post with different parts being brought to focus.
Like the first part would be your introduction to the post and what content it'll contain, it appears to be about the existence of the Original Thought.
The Original Thought is that Paradoxical Singularity that spawned itself, in it's unknown state it was simply unfocused infinity, and before that conscious unfocuses state, it was an emptiness of awareness that made infinity empty in all its infinity.
So from that awareness, focus, and then knowledge (of the self spawning the Original Thought which might be grossly summed up as 'I Am Love') we try to understand the further implications of this as you see.
Those implications appear to be that infinity is mainly and majorly unmanifest or potentiated, but from that potentiated state the means to produce or manifest allow creator to uniquely, and infinitely, explore itself evermore due to the results of that design of potentiation for kinetic use.
And more stuff, you may note if I've incorrectly framed your own thoughts as not matching to your post, it's because it's a bit jumbled and I had a very hard time remaining focused on what your focus was.
I'll try to interact and help you elaborate more if you'd like as I'm ALWAYS interested in Origins of Creator and Speculation of the Original Thought.
I mean no insult, only constructive criticism! You have shared a lot, but it's hard to grasp with my puny attention span
That is a big wall of text, it might be less intimidating to read with a few more paragraph breaks
I got about 1/4th the way through the first block before I started rereading the same line which led me to lose my train of focus.
As someone who's been hit with 'tl;dr' (too long didn't read), I don't want your time spent on making this post to be somehow a waste because it was to long for anyone to fully read.
I suggest making an outline of the structure of your post with different parts being brought to focus.
Like the first part would be your introduction to the post and what content it'll contain, it appears to be about the existence of the Original Thought.
The Original Thought is that Paradoxical Singularity that spawned itself, in it's unknown state it was simply unfocused infinity, and before that conscious unfocuses state, it was an emptiness of awareness that made infinity empty in all its infinity.
So from that awareness, focus, and then knowledge (of the self spawning the Original Thought which might be grossly summed up as 'I Am Love') we try to understand the further implications of this as you see.
Those implications appear to be that infinity is mainly and majorly unmanifest or potentiated, but from that potentiated state the means to produce or manifest allow creator to uniquely, and infinitely, explore itself evermore due to the results of that design of potentiation for kinetic use.
And more stuff, you may note if I've incorrectly framed your own thoughts as not matching to your post, it's because it's a bit jumbled and I had a very hard time remaining focused on what your focus was.
I'll try to interact and help you elaborate more if you'd like as I'm ALWAYS interested in Origins of Creator and Speculation of the Original Thought.
I mean no insult, only constructive criticism! You have shared a lot, but it's hard to grasp with my puny attention span