02-23-2011, 05:18 PM
Quote: If we're talking about channeling and other such metaphysical fields, then reliability has to be measured by personal resonance and personal verification.
Correct.
Quote:So, unity100 doesn't think these four researchers are reliable. Why? Is it because they research the metaphysical which can't be proven? Or is it because they don't personally resonate? A combination of both? I'm not vouching for their reliability or lack thereof either way.
Understandable.
Quote:Also, you seem to associate Don's troubles and Carla's claims with something that someone could use to question the reliability of the material. But would it be a jump to conclusion to think that because of tremendous difficulties or extraordinary claims that the material was possibly influenced?
Absolutely, I would just say that channeling and hypnosis are both of the Metaphysical.
Since I have had experiences regarding this phenomena(alien contact) I am trying to keep and open mind. The real question is how much distortion do you get with hypnosis? How reliable is it- any less/more than channeling?