12-28-2009, 02:01 PM
Thanks for the astrology thread, Transiten.
I just noticed, even your user name here is astrological!
I will stop by to appreciate your thread before my transit out to the day's errands. Later I hope to return and participate more fully.
Ra said that there are three valuable systems of imagery that help people understand the archetypes. They are tarot, astrology, and kaballah. Don and Ra proceeded on the path of studying the tarot. I see how comprehensive Ra was about other information. So I like to imagine that if the Ra contact had continued, Ra would have also discussed the other two systems as well.
There are a few comments about astrology in the Ra material. Here's the search for them:
http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?search_string=astrology&search_type=any&ss=1
To really make the most of Ra's comments here, a search for "archetypes" brings up an abundance of material. 74.4 has a comment that leaves me scratching my head, wondering if I understand:
What I wonder here is if Ra meant to say that only so much can be learned from a teacher, the rest must be discovered anew by each individual mind/body/spirit having its own learning process. As I understand this, the result of this independent study will be a personal relationship with each of the archetypes as a living personality. But I'm not sure I get the correct meaning here.
I've not had time to explore the material that comes up from searching the rest of the L/L Research site for astrology:
http://www.llresearch.org/search/search_google.aspx
When I search for the keyword astrology, I see there are several pages of results.
I just noticed, even your user name here is astrological!
I will stop by to appreciate your thread before my transit out to the day's errands. Later I hope to return and participate more fully.
Ra said that there are three valuable systems of imagery that help people understand the archetypes. They are tarot, astrology, and kaballah. Don and Ra proceeded on the path of studying the tarot. I see how comprehensive Ra was about other information. So I like to imagine that if the Ra contact had continued, Ra would have also discussed the other two systems as well.
There are a few comments about astrology in the Ra material. Here's the search for them:
http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?search_string=astrology&search_type=any&ss=1
To really make the most of Ra's comments here, a search for "archetypes" brings up an abundance of material. 74.4 has a comment that leaves me scratching my head, wondering if I understand:
Quote:We could go forward with more and more refinements of these two entries into the archetypical mind. We could discuss color correspondences, relationships with other archetypes, and so forth. This is the work of the adept, not the teach/learner. We may only suggest that there are systems of study which may address themselves to the aspects of the archetypical mind and it is well to choose one and study carefully. It is more nearly well if the adept go beyond whatever has been written and make such correspondences that the archetype can be called upon at will.
What I wonder here is if Ra meant to say that only so much can be learned from a teacher, the rest must be discovered anew by each individual mind/body/spirit having its own learning process. As I understand this, the result of this independent study will be a personal relationship with each of the archetypes as a living personality. But I'm not sure I get the correct meaning here.
I've not had time to explore the material that comes up from searching the rest of the L/L Research site for astrology:
http://www.llresearch.org/search/search_google.aspx
When I search for the keyword astrology, I see there are several pages of results.