09-02-2012, 03:04 PM
(09-02-2012, 02:23 PM)TheEternal Wrote: You've confused us Shin'Ar.
"Neither action nor reaction can be defined love.
It is only the choosing to deliberately move in the direction which manifests the environment described above in the latter desription, as opposed to the former, which establishes the existence of love. And this is also the direction which leads toward Light rather than darkness."
Is not the "choosing" an action or reaction? It seems to me you suggest that "love is when you move towards the light and not the darkness", and I have to blatantly, and bluntly disagree with this notion. This seems to me to be a justification for your manner of choosing.
Love, IS direction, but there is not a left and right, because Love is ALL directions. Love is motion itself, which is electro-magnetic in nature. Love is the mating of fields, and thus the first Love was the Creator mating with Itself. Thus, Love is the fundamental interaction within the universe. Love is part of the innate intelligence of the universe, for it is within Love that Wisdom is found, and within Wisdom that Love is found, and when Love and Wisdom come together we have Infinite Intelligence with Infinite Creativity.
The "existence of Love" is self established. The actions and movements of humans do not decide the existence of Love, in one way or the other. It seems to me you are attaching the idea of Love to some set of external actions which are described by a particular "type" of environment. In one go you say that Love is no action, and then state that action is required for Love to exist. That for Love to exist, it needs to have an appearance in the external environment which is "recognizable" as the notion of Love which is held in the mind.
This, in our Mind, seems quite silly! You are only seeking to confirm and see reflected the Love which is innate within Consciousness. The "manifestation" of Love is all Experience.
My friend, are you sure you do not have Love and "sentiment", confused? When one holds sentiments, they choose this or that direction, they have preference, they are attached to this or that outcome. When one holds Love, all pathways are seen to be as One direction, left or right, it does not matter, for all culminates in Love.
My understanding is that for love to exist there must be the polarities opposing each other, and it is in the direction toward one rather then the other which establishes the existence of love.
I realize that some of you believe that murder is love as well as hatred and many other manifestations of choice that create an environment of a particular character.
That is not my understanding as you know, and so it does not surprise me that you would find my understanding 'silly'.
(09-02-2012, 03:03 PM)TheEternal Wrote: I like that definition!
however you would also like it if she had said that love was her feeling of hatred toward another where she wanted to slit their throat.
Is that correct?
I think it is when we try to incorporate love into all behavior that we really remove its reality of being realized by the existence of all aspects.
but that it exists as a result of all, does not mean that all represents it.