Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio mandela effect...earth no longer outer edge of galaxy?

    Thread: mandela effect...earth no longer outer edge of galaxy?


    alchemikey (Offline)

    namaste
    Posts: 569
    Threads: 27
    Joined: Dec 2008
    #1
    05-01-2016, 05:56 PM (This post was last modified: 05-01-2016, 07:04 PM by alchemikey.)
    not sure if this has been brought up here yet but i was curious what you all thought about this and other mandela effects

    i know i recall reading many llresearch transcripts that mentioned our solar system is on the outer edge of the milky way galaxy

    if you look up where we are located in the milky way now it puts earth right in the middle of the galactic center and the rim

    http://www.universetoday.com/65601/where...milky-way/

    i remember berenstein bears
    looney toons
    mirror mirror on the wall

    those ones really stick out to me

    any thoughts?

    peace,
    mikey

      •
    Patrick (Offline)

    YAY - Yet Another You
    Posts: 5,635
    Threads: 64
    Joined: Mar 2012
    #2
    05-01-2016, 08:08 PM
    What is shown on your galactic map is pretty much considered the edge.  Maybe not in terms of distance, but in terms of density of stars.

    It's more evident in this image.

    [Image: 03-our%20solar%20system.jpg]

      •
    AnthroHeart (Offline)

    Anthro at Heart
    Posts: 19,119
    Threads: 1,298
    Joined: Jan 2010
    #3
    05-01-2016, 09:00 PM
    http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthrea...ht=mandela

      •
    alchemikey (Offline)

    namaste
    Posts: 569
    Threads: 27
    Joined: Dec 2008
    #4
    05-01-2016, 10:36 PM
    if you use the wayback machine it shows berenstein switching to berenstain somewhere between april 2001 and august 2001

    https://web.archive.org/web/200104070938...stein.html

      •
    Stranger (Offline)

    A bipedal monkey
    Posts: 1,159
    Threads: 85
    Joined: Mar 2014
    #5
    05-02-2016, 08:03 AM (This post was last modified: 05-02-2016, 08:38 AM by Stranger.)
    I really think people are overthinking this. "Berenstein" is the normal, expected spelling so it makes sense that if you don't look too closely -- or just go by hearing -- your mind will assume the expected spelling. Then at some point you actually look at the letters and - whoa! it's Berenstain!

    In the meantime, until the discovery, we keep using the incorrect spelling. The linked site is a third-party site where it's spelled "Berenstein". Click on the "official site link" at the bottom, and you'll see that in 2001 it was still Berenstain.

    If reality changed, it would have changed the past also in a completely seamless way.

    Our minds are great at finding patterns we're familiar with - like faces in trees and all those sentences floating around on the Internet where random letters are used to replace what's supposed to be there, but we can still read it and barely even notice.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked Stranger for this post:1 member thanked Stranger for this post
      • Spaced
    Sabou (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 411
    Threads: 22
    Joined: Sep 2014
    #6
    05-02-2016, 09:50 AM
    Yeah, the more I look at the books spelled as Berenstain the more I'm convinced it was always spelled that way and i am just remembering it wrong, phonetically.

    Meanwhile, the matrix overlords laugh victoriously as I type this ...
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked Sabou for this post:1 member thanked Sabou for this post
      • Jade
    AnthroHeart (Offline)

    Anthro at Heart
    Posts: 19,119
    Threads: 1,298
    Joined: Jan 2010
    #7
    05-02-2016, 10:36 AM
    (05-02-2016, 08:03 AM)Stranger Wrote: I really think people are overthinking this.  "Berenstein" is the normal, expected spelling so it makes sense that if you don't look too closely -- or just go by hearing -- your mind will assume the expected spelling.  Then at some point you actually look at the letters and - whoa!  it's Berenstain!

    In the meantime, until the discovery, we keep using the incorrect spelling.  The linked site is a third-party site where it's spelled "Berenstein".  Click on the "official site link" at the bottom, and you'll see that in 2001 it was still Berenstain.

    If reality changed, it would have changed the past also in a completely seamless way.

    Our minds are great at finding patterns we're familiar with - like faces in trees and all those sentences floating around on the Internet where random letters are used to replace what's supposed to be there, but we can still read it and barely even notice.

    Yeah, real magic is hokum.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode